"\u003C!DOCTYPE html\u003E\u003Chtml xmlns:xlink=\u0022http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\u0022 xmlns:xsi=\u0022http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance\u0022 xmlns:mml=\u0022http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\u0022\u003E\n  \u003Chead\u003E\n    \u003CMETA http-equiv=\u0022Content-Type\u0022 content=\u0022text/html; charset=utf-16\u0022\u003E\n    \u003Cmeta name=\u0022viewport\u0022 content=\u0022width=device-width, initial-scale=1\u0022\u003E\n  \u003C/head\u003E\n  \u003Cbody style=\u0022font-family:sans-serif; font-size:100%;\u0022\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022HpsHansard\u0022\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000001\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsProceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00221263c507b4a64663abd4a3e3e58292e4\u0022\u003EWednesday, 16 March 2011\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000003\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00220627a2db8187495cbe6afc5601a9d74f\u0022\u003EWednesday, 16 March 2011\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000002\u0022\u003EMr Speaker took the Chair at 2 p.m.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000004\u0022\u003EPrayers.\u003C/p\u003E\n    \u003C/div\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022HpsHansard\u0022\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000005\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsProceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00226d6091824a2c4926a130b9c9427ff915\u0022\u003EQuestions for Oral Answer\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000006\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00223262913618684ca385d6cfccad64cae5\u0022\u003EQuestions to Ministers\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000007\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00220217fd64481a4c6db389e9fee40ca0b8\u0022\u003EMineral Resources\u2014Value and Government Plans for Development\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022 data-id=\u0022121eff95abba4e69ae3efdc6e85b3d68\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000008\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E1. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022121eff95abba4e69ae3efdc6e85b3d68\u0022\u003EHon RODNEY HIDE (Leader\u2014ACT)\u003C/span\u003E to the Acting Minister of Energy and Resources: Does she accept her ministry\u2019s advice that the value of New Zealand\u2019s onshore minerals, excluding hydrocarbons, is $194 billion overall, with $80 billion estimated in schedule 4 land; if so, what plans does the Government have to allow their development?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022 data-id=\u0022b0257ae57e274ba9839f3482f1e5412d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000009\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b0257ae57e274ba9839f3482f1e5412d\u0022\u003EHon HEKIA PARATA (Acting Minister of Energy and Resources):\u003C/span\u003E To the first part of the question, I accept the Ministry of Economic Development\u2019s advice that an estimate of the gross value of New Zealand\u2019s in-ground onshore minerals, excluding hydrocarbons, is $194 billion. To the second part of the question, the Government has made it clear that it does not intend to remove any land from schedule 4. However, the Government is interested in seeing an increase in mineral activity on non - schedule 4 land in which there is considerable potential, and it has taken a number of steps to encourage that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000010\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bd1d35bf3fe84601accc1c7c473104cb\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: Why is it that the Government thinks a simple hole in the ground is so damaging that the country should forgo $80 billion worth of wealth, the jobs and the investment in growth, and instead live from hand to mouth by borrowing $300 million a week?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000011\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002205f9720156b54496a555cabc6100fa2e\u0022\u003EHon HEKIA PARATA\u003C/span\u003E: The member will know that the Government recognises the need to balance economic opportunities with environmental responsibility. New Zealand has had a robust debate about mining on schedule 4 land. The Government listened to the debate and has ruled out removing land from schedule 4. However, like the member, the Government is keen to see New Zealand\u2019s extensive mineral wealth utilised in a responsible way for the benefit of all New Zealanders, and it is taking a number of steps to encourage that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000012\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002280f28f312c9f4f66b2bae6c11862483e\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: Can the Minister share with the House the number of jobs and lost opportunities that the decision to leave that $80 billion under the ground represents; or is it, in fact, the case that the Government does not know?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000013\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002200433588239840a59ac22f880920651c\u0022\u003EHon HEKIA PARATA\u003C/span\u003E: The Government has taken a number of steps to explore opportunities on non - schedule 4 land, including undertaking a significant aeromagnetic survey in Northland and on the West Coast of the South Island, to learn more about which areas have the highest concentrations of valuable minerals.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000014\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d5d4b60cb65745ca873b06182b948f03\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I think you could anticipate my point of order. The answer did not address what was a straightforward question about schedule 4 land, not the other land. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000015\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022187c15f811a34f37bf26c37f33a0ffec\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I invite the member to repeat his question, bearing in mind that he is addressing the question to the Acting Minister of Energy and Resources.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000016\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b91bff47055f49f0a3bb693ebd806866\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: Can the Minister share with the House the trade-off in terms of jobs and lost opportunity that leaving the $80 billion of minerals under the schedule 4 land represents, or does the Minister not know?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000017\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221beca436a3e0445e9c3b972c8b502ee8\u0022\u003EHon HEKIA PARATA\u003C/span\u003E: As I answered to the primary question, the Government is focused on the $114 billion worth of mineral potential on non - schedule 4 land, and that is what we are exploring.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000018\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f45e9aad4a464f7184460dfd6bfd0261\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. [Interruption] \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000019\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022db8008db758840b1a7fc9460209674fb\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: A point of order has been called.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000020\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225a57cfe7f9904763a0374dacc7514c8d\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: Again, with the greatest of respect, that was a perfectly fine answer to the first question, but the third question was different. It was to the point. The Minister could have answered it quite simply, but repeating the answer to the first question does not answer the third question, which was straightforward.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000021\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c2046ed3a1f846b3ba5bf4eb79f3170c\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I think, unfortunately, the member did give an alternative: whether the Government knew or did not know. I think the answer actually indicated\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000022\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ee9c0e00a40b41d3aba590db95f5b6f8\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I blame myself for having allowed that point of order, which was not particularly helpful. I think on this occasion, in fairness, the member asked whether the Government had weighed up the opportunities, or the cost and benefits of the opportunities, against the costs of not taking action. The Minister\u2019s reply was that the Government is focused on a certain portion of the mineral estate that was identified in the primary question. I believe that was an answer to the question. I did listen carefully, and I think with this kind of question there is no particular answer to it. The Minister chose to answer it in that way, and I believe that was not unreasonable.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000023\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bc1e9f65-e08b-4939-867c-22ef093e2a4e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022094b9de542a44fc385933f1b30fe2b28\u0022\u003EHon Rodney Hide\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I tread warily, but that was not my question. I did not ask about the trade-off or whether the Government had considered it. I specifically asked\u2014twice\u2014whether the Minister could share with the House the trade-off, or whether the Government did not know. Talking about what the Government is focused on in the other land definitely does not address that question. The Minister could just say the Government does not know because it did not do the work, but she cannot talk about\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000024\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224e08edde2c094952bd0375003b8d84cb\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I think the member is being unreasonable. If he thinks about his question he will realise it was what I summarised, in very loose terms. I do not pretend to be perfect in summarising a member\u2019s question, but the answer that the Minister gave was her reaction to that issue. She said, on behalf of the Government, that the Government is focused on a certain part of the land\u2014that having weighed up the costs and benefits of the entire mineral estate, the Government is focused on a certain part of it. In answering in that way, I believe she did address the issue of trade-offs. But there is no specific answer to that question. That is why I am not being any harder on the Minister in trying to get a particular answer from her, because there is no particular answer to that question. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000025\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002259e9efe2-6dea-4eeb-869a-ef5b3e48a5b5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222cd6dd2fdcf24ee38d8de45ca3d57117\u0022\u003ECharles Chauvel\u003C/span\u003E: Has she seen the reports valuing mineral resources and mining\u2019s impact on tourism, both by Terry Consultants, which show that the actual value of the proposal outlined in the substantive question is nothing like $80 billion and more like $25 per person, and that is before taking into account the tourism revenue that New Zealand would lose if the proposal proceeded?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000026\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226e1ead03-bf7f-496a-a02f-ce52859c58c1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002214af1198b96044429b2365234c41cb00\u0022\u003EHon HEKIA PARATA\u003C/span\u003E: No. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000027\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002259e9efe2-6dea-4eeb-869a-ef5b3e48a5b5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002266669d7abe334a38b46c9b9b71574ea3\u0022\u003ECharles Chauvel\u003C/span\u003E: I seek leave to table, for the Minister\u2019s benefit, the two reports to which I referred in my supplementary question. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000028\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d987f7c630964ba581ba63deed8169fa\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought to table those documents. Is there any objection? There is no objection. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000029\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EDocuments, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000030\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022b5f2aa990fb74577926eb105ab3a5047\u0022\u003EQuestion No. 2 to Minister\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022d98a2778e44744598c14d81b4d1569fd\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000031\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d98a2778e44744598c14d81b4d1569fd\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I know that the transfer of questions is fraught. I have had a discussion on this issue with your office, not about the ability of Ministers to transfer questions but about what happens with the wording of the question when one has been transferred, as this one has been. This question, as you know, was originally drafted to ask about the Prime Minister\u2019s knowledge of a particular situation. We accept his right to choose not to answer the question and to transfer it. My question is whether, when a question is transferred to another Minister, we can get a better format in relation to the words when the question is about the actual advice, especially from the Prime Minister\u2019s office and his department, which we are focusing on, and which no other Minister can have responsibility for.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022 data-id=\u00223f4def561fe04f3ab80c6cb739c95e70\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000032\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00223f4def561fe04f3ab80c6cb739c95e70\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: My understanding is that when this question was transferred, the wording was amended so that the question still focused on the advice that the Prime Minister, the Government, or Rugby New Zealand 2011 had been given. The focus of the question remains on what the Prime Minister knows about it. Obviously, in transferring the question, one would expect that the Minister for the Rugby World Cup would have knowledge of that, or the question should not have been transferred. It is very simple: questions should not be transferred to avoid their being answered by the only person who might have knowledge of something. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022332fa501f3ac428eab90b413f00592fd\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000033\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022332fa501f3ac428eab90b413f00592fd\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. It is a relatively obvious one. The Minister for the Rugby World Cup cannot have responsibility for the advice that is given by agencies for which he is not responsible. Clearly, for those agencies further down the line, such as the Ministry of Economic Development and Rugby World Cup 2011, he does have responsibility, but he cannot have responsibility for advice given\u2014as it was in this case\u2014by the Prime Minister\u2019s office and the department, because he is not part of that chain. I know this is a hard question, but we have seen, I think, 17 public statements from the Prime Minister in the last day on this issue, and it seems to me that even if the Prime Minister is not able to answer the question, it would have been better to leave it to the Prime Minister\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022 data-id=\u0022b75a2ae66d1e4adb878339675c9f7090\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000034\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b75a2ae66d1e4adb878339675c9f7090\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: The question of who answers questions is a matter totally for the Government. I repeat what I said a moment ago. If I as Speaker perceive that a question is being transferred from the only Minister who could possibly have the information that is the focus of the question, I would become very concerned. If the question was being transferred to avoid its being answered by the only Minister who could possibly have responsibility for, or knowledge of, the matter, that would be a serious matter. In the transfer of this question I would expect the Minister to have knowledge of what the Prime Minister has been advised. The question of whether he divulges that information to the House, and whether it is in the public interest to do so, is another matter. But if the question is being transferred, I would expect that the Minister would have knowledge of the subject matter. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000035\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022346e92ef4ad4494796cedba4fd0c4cb6\u0022\u003EEarthquake, Christchurch\u2014Rugby World Cup Matches\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022 data-id=\u002282f140ccecbe442dadd3e7fef0a1ffcf\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000036\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E2. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002282f140ccecbe442dadd3e7fef0a1ffcf\u0022\u003EHon PHIL GOFF (Leader of the Opposition)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister for the Rugby World Cup: What advice has he, the Government, or Rugby New Zealand 2011 been given on Christchurch\u2019s ability to host Rugby World Cup matches later this year?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022 data-id=\u0022f65baf5b86914afca7e368667a60249b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000037\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f65baf5b86914afca7e368667a60249b\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister of Transport)\u003C/span\u003E on behalf of the Minister for the Rugby World Cup: In the early part of this week Vbase, the Christchurch City Council company responsible for operating AMI Stadium, received an assessment from engineers of the work required to restore the stadium to a standard capable of hosting test matches. At the same time reports were received by the Government on the current state of hotel accommodation in Christchurch and on the likely state of hotel accommodation in September of this year. Those reports are being discussed by the Minister for the Rugby World Cup, officials from the International Rugby Board, Vbase executives, and New Zealand Rugby Union representatives in Christchurch this afternoon. It would serve the public interest to allow the Minister to complete his discussions with other stakeholders before providing more information on those reports. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000038\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e1f164a953e942da9e657e2ade3ba898\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: What recommendation has the Government or Rugby New Zealand 2011 made to the International Rugby Board about the ability of Christchurch to host these matches? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000039\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c5b6ded7cb73483cbf7c94d8a99c297a\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I do not know whether any recommendation has been made. All I know, again, is that the discussions are continuing currently and that it would best serve the public interest for those discussions to have the opportunity to be completed. I point out to the Leader of the Opposition that I think there has been an announcement that a news conference will be held around 3 o\u2019clock this afternoon in Christchurch, at which point, no doubt, the Minister will further update the media on the discussions. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000040\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223241d35044df4971849259c5513cb742\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: When the Prime Minister said earlier this week that it was the International Rugby Board\u2019s call but in the end they look to the Government, does he expect the International Rugby Board\u2019s decision to reflect the view of the Government? Is the Prime Minister correct?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000041\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ae9c0929e97e4b689ff4c009ea3971a0\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: The Prime Minister is always correct. The International Rugby Board is the owner of the tournament, and, of course, it has been working alongside the Government and other stakeholders. As the member may be aware, the International Rugby Board officials have flown overnight to arrive in Christchurch for the meeting that is occurring right now. Once again, I think we should wait until the meeting has been completed. I understand there is a media briefing afterwards and at that point the Minister will no doubt update discussions. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000042\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022718cf87e6db14bf987dd7e2db7b417c9\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: Has the Prime Minister received any advice of the International Rugby Board\u2019s likely decision; if so, on what date did his office receive that advice?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000043\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a68f4cc7b1c641b8a966131a037b56e6\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: It is my understanding that the discussions are continuing right now, and I presume that that is why the International Rugby Board officials have flown overnight to have those discussions this afternoon with the Minister, Vbase, the New Zealand Rugby Union, and Rugby New Zealand 2011.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000044\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a584770d6f5d4757bfcbad45c39ff155\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. My question was very specific. It asked whether the Prime Minister had received advice on the International Rugby Board\u2019s likely decision; if so, on what date. I do not believe that the Minister actually answered that specific and very straightforward question. It is a yes or no answer. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000045\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022474c55cd6fca47009619a701b2be801c\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: The Minister in his answer said the International Rugby Board officials have come here and are having discussions right now. Unless the Minister wishes to clarify that point any further, it would seem that he has made it clear to the House that the officials are here now to discuss the matter, so they can hardly have made up their mind yet. The Hon Steven Joyce may be able to assist. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000046\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ab7db026729f4805a53b269bec0a54fc\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: That is exactly the point I was making. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000047\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a5aa2a73e55743aba1a0752aa9129d37\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: Is he aware of the Prime Minister\u2019s view of the preliminary decision of the International Rugby Board, which is to be announced at 3 o\u2019clock?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000048\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227ebd27e9bac845758f5b416490bf6cc7\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I think everybody on that side of the House is trying to get ahead of themselves. The point is that the discussions are currently taking place. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000049\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002263851a0c63404c9eb3c6c33dbc079218\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: Mr Speaker\u2014[Interruption] \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000050\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bab67def43c04fb9a0d5a4ff43b382b2\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Before I call the Leader of the Opposition, I say to the shadow Leader of the House that he is very experienced and he knows that that kind of interjection is unacceptable. He will not make further such interjections. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000051\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221764f6f3d9f84c708984066906724e6f\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: Did the engineering reports that he received on the AMI Stadium indicate that the stadium would by the due date be able to hold those games?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000052\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223436e9349d0b4609a3909069d15d5617\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I am not aware. I presume that the Minister has seen the assessment now, because he is in Christchurch having meetings with Vbase. I understand that the assessment discussed the work required to restore the AMI Stadium, and I assume that it would also include the timetable that it would take to do so. But, again, those discussions are continuing this afternoon, and there will be a media briefing at 3 o\u2019clock. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000053\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229cf4c75415a740358b0d14cfaa6f56fd\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: Has the Minister received advice that, following the earthquake, accommodation and other infrastructure in Christchurch is capable of meeting the needs of the thousands of rugby fans who would come to the city to watch those games?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000054\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ec1499f717c34a369f6f1179486195ca\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: The advice received indicated a significant level of uncertainty as to the exact level of accommodation available at this time. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000055\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002259683c919a1943d69f58d859f86334a2\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: If Christchurch is deemed unable to host the games, will he be pressing for as many games as possible that were to be held at the AMI Stadium to be held within the Canterbury region and in the South Island?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000056\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022845caa083d614ce8bf7256a012659292\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I am not privy to the approach that is being taken or the discussions that are taking place at this point, or, indeed, whether those issues will be addressed at 3 o\u2019clock this afternoon when the media briefing takes place. I think we have to just wait and see. It is not a long time between now and 3 o\u2019clock; it is currently 40 minutes and 30 seconds away. We should get some information then. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000057\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022854dc6283b214786b0da9a36d1d532ec\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: Do the discussions that are allegedly currently occurring in Christchurch involve the Prime Minister by way of phone conference?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000058\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225efce21de24b4fba9c113d51e6729411\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I am not aware that they do.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022105f0f411acc42c9b46c69b23cfa268e\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I refer back to the earlier point of order by my colleague Trevor Mallard. The difficulty I have with the answers to those questions is that the acting Minister was unable to answer any one of them, supposedly because he did not have any of the advice. Does that mean it is appropriate to transfer a question to another Minister who does not have the information?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000060\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002228b9a57fb02a47beb862162b3b902090\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: In all sincerity I say to the honourable member that if he reflects on the questions asked and the answers given, it may just be that he is about an hour early in asking his questions. There may be no answer to them yet. That is what any, I think, reasonable person would take from the answers given. If members believe that some other plot is going on somewhere, I cannot help with that as Speaker of the House. Questions were asked and I believe the answers, under the circumstances, were reasonable. To suggest otherwise is, I think, not being reasonable. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000061\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c699e7c6-53b9-470c-a14a-378cb6fc8a04\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d583cfac5a5e47f8b1f7ae407126968b\u0022\u003EHon Phil Goff\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. With regard to the ruling that you have just made, if you reflect on the questions that I have asked, you will see that they are questions where the information is available because reports have been received. That is why I made the point that I did. It cannot possibly be correct that we do not know what is in the reports, because those reports were received\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000062\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a530c84a3e40415ca0ab66346f85f9c7\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Now we are debating the substance of the issue, which we are not going to do. Let me just point out to the member that he was asserting in his questions that the Prime Minister had had some pre-discussion advice from the International Rugby Board and that he would somehow know what the International Rugby Board was going to decide. That was the implication in the questions asked. The Minister pointed out that that was not his understanding of the situation, and that is where the matter has to lie. Members were pursuing a certain line of questioning and the Minister answered the questions. Given the facts of the matter\u2014as the Minister described to the House, there will be a press conference shortly to advise on some of these matters\u2014it does not seem unreasonable, if there is a meeting going on right now. I do not intend to take the time of the House to litigate it further.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000063\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221951eac37f8c4d1fb20be044cf6f01e1\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000064\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228af610ecc88b410ba19658d07c0addc8\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I will hear the Hon Trevor Mallard briefly, but it had better be a good point of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000065\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002209690b158e404322898bc5ca8b55200a\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: It is a good point of order. I think there were two specific quotes from the Leader of the Opposition. One was from the Prime Minister, which indicated that\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000066\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ae708a281ebf4016ba61f52e6172e4d3\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Can I first check with the member what issue of order he seeks to address.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000067\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e6b8f96e441141959e96af2915268f23\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: The issue of order goes to the answers given and whether they are likely to lead to disorder\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000068\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fecfc96ad4f64e2e8e8249b4fd842571\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: No, that is not a valid point of order. It is not a valid point of order. The Speaker determines whether a question has been answered. It is my assessment that the questions were answered in a reasonable manner, given the facts of the matter. That is the end of that. That is not an issue of order to be debated further by way of point of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000069\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224fa4881a109d475e894d9e680b866f94\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000070\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cc71974aaccb4e6f8ed9488618569785\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I will hear the member in case I have made a mistake.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000071\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002298c04713889c4042be520af968b9a058\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I know this is getting dangerous. The problem we have is that we are aware that a decision has been made and the Minister\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000072\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e623f73cb4f447609f7d505a2f196265\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: This is not a point of order. The member is treading on very dangerous ground. Any further deviation from the Standing Orders and the member will be leaving the House, because that is not a point of order. It is irrelevant what members might understand or think they understand about what decisions may or may not have been made. It is absolutely irrelevant to the order of this House. The member has questioned the acting Minister and the Minister answered, and that is the end of the matter for question time.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000073\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022f74472c7c55b42d690ae6f917cee65f2\u0022\u003EEconomy\u2014Prospects After Christchurch\u2019s Immediate Needs Met\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00225f1453f8-c44e-4ce6-b699-64d600322276\u0022 data-id=\u0022d5808430e1f143a3915e9465d60e11fc\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000074\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00225f1453f8-c44e-4ce6-b699-64d600322276\u0022\u003E3. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d5808430e1f143a3915e9465d60e11fc\u0022\u003ECHESTER BORROWS (National\u2014Whanganui)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Finance: What reports has he received on the economy\u2019s prospects after New Zealand meets the immediate challenges of the Christchurch earthquake?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022 data-id=\u0022a433ec9e8fc545cc86145012cbf2f14f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000075\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a433ec9e8fc545cc86145012cbf2f14f\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance):\u003C/span\u003E Both Treasury and the Reserve Bank expect economic growth to be weaker in the first half of the year but to pick up strongly in 2012. The Reserve Bank forecasts GDP peaking at about 5 percent next year and unemployment falling below 5 percent. These forecasts recognise a number of favourable factors for the economy: high commodity prices, both interest rates and inflation being expected to stay low, the exchange rate with Australia being the most competitive in 20 years, and households significantly lifting their savings rates.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000076\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00225f1453f8-c44e-4ce6-b699-64d600322276\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224fec45d4bfee41eebe9914a9ee0e96a4\u0022\u003EChester Borrows\u003C/span\u003E: What are some of the likely costs the Government will face as a result of the earthquake?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000077\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022712d67bca3c940f39bdaac460916fddf\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: Although the costs of the earthquake are likely to be significant and may delay growth in the economy, we still agree with the Reserve Bank and Treasury views that next year we are likely to see significant economic growth. But the costs are likely to include about $3 billion of residential property claims to the Earthquake Commission, significant contributions from the Government to the cost of roading, water, and sewerage systems in Christchurch, some costs for land remediation, and significant costs that are being incurred now for welfare assistance and temporary housing. They are significant costs but they will be manageable.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000078\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00225f1453f8-c44e-4ce6-b699-64d600322276\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cf545cab7ad84f6abd39f750b5dac83b\u0022\u003EChester Borrows\u003C/span\u003E: What will the earthquake mean for the Government\u2019s wider economic programme to build a faster-growing economy and higher incomes?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000079\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224485e5eb1d6649629a8d99abe8688b34\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: The earthquake has simply made it more important that the Government press on with its programme to build on savings, exports, and productive investment. The costs we are incurring now will mean that we have to take on more debt in the short term. But, of course, a stronger economy will mean that later on we have more capacity to repay that debt.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000080\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022454f747d52cf4b638352395a4d1e8985\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Why should New Zealanders have any more confidence in these forecasts of a rebound in 2012 than in those in Budgets 2009 and 2010, which had all been consistently revised downwards prior to the earthquake because of low growth, high unemployment, falling revenues, and National\u2019s deepening recession?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000081\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022aeed852927664b239fdb0439bbbf539f\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: It will be up to them, of course. New Zealanders will make their own decisions about whether to invest more or spend more. Over the last couple of years they have wisely been careful with their spending and increased their savings. I expect that as their confidence picks up as the rebuild gets going, they will be willing to invest more in the productive side of the economy. When they have their debt levels right\u2014that is, when they have got their debt down\u2014they may start spending a bit more.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000082\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022aa7120d12eb9478c9593a6864ce581bc\u0022\u003ETelecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill\u2014Report-back Date\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022 data-id=\u00224cfc2f84eaa24f6b884a898cae431325\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000083\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E4. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224cfc2f84eaa24f6b884a898cae431325\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour\u2014New Lynn)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister for Communications and Information Technology: Would he indicate his agreement to a further extension, if it were required, to the report back date for the Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband and Other Matters) Amendment Bill?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022 data-id=\u0022f3bec69f3aac43fb973c9d761e6bda5a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000084\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f3bec69f3aac43fb973c9d761e6bda5a\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister for Communications and Information Technology):\u003C/span\u003E No; I do not think such an extension is necessary. The first reading of this bill occurred on 9 December last year and the Finance and Expenditure Committee has until 16 May to complete its consideration, which is a period of getting on towards 6 months. Supplementary Order Paper 204 in relation to Telecom\u2019s potential structural separation was tabled on 16 January, but I note that many of the issues\u2014in fact, most of the issues\u2014in it were canvassed in a discussion document, which was released in September of last year.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000085\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ca52aa8170ff4d698817553d05bc9ff7\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Does the Minister consider 10 minutes for the submission of a major corporate or industry body on this complex legislation to be sufficient, or might he agree with the Chief Executive Officer of the Telecommunications Users Association of New Zealand, Paul Brislen, who said that the process for this bill has been \u201Coutrageous\u201D; if not, why not?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000086\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e9084a2877df43e884e350e39fc08f78\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I note to the member that the deliberations of, and hearing of submissions by, the committee is one for the committee. I also note that one of the companies, I think it was Vector, was given 40 minutes in front of the committee\u2014this morning I understand. The other point to make in terms of Mr Brislen is that he needs to decide which view he is taking, because he congratulated us previously on the approach we were taking to the bill. He said: \u201CThere is plenty to get our teeth into and now we have the time to do just that.\u201D\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221f03ff6b1fba420da416cac0e61b3e4f\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Has he been involved in any way, either directly or through his staff, in communicating to Government members of the Finance and Expenditure Committee or their staff in relation to the process for oral hearings on the bill; if so, on approximately what dates and to what end?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e0ead5c053b44dfb971dfd19f349ceaa\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: No, I have not. I cannot vouch for every member of everybody\u2019s staff, but I am not aware of anything occurring in that regard.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000089\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a5b2b67235e141388b351b84ddb815eb\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Does he agree with TelstraClear\u2019s Chief Executive Officer, Allan Freeth, who claims that the hearing process for oral submissions on the telecommunications amendment bill is a \u201Cdemocratic farce\u201D, and that not enough time has been given to speakers to adequately articulate a position; if not, why not?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000090\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c5a9cc62934d481292c5abebc83a8ba1\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I am aware of Mr Freeth\u2019s views. I point out to the member that Mr Freeth has been opposed to the whole idea of the Ultra-fast Broadband Initiative since it was first announced in 2008. So I suppose the question for the member would be whether he is now siding with Mr Freeth in terms of his views on the Ultra-fast Broadband Initiative.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000091\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002265be20818dbd4189a29e32bdb919b515\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Does the Minister agree with Vector\u2019s Group Chief Executive Officer, Simon Mackenzie, who warned the Finance and Expenditure Committee just today that the consequences of the Supplementary Order Paper and the truncated, partisan process of the bill will increase regulatory risk and investor uncertainty, and that that will be priced into up-front bid costs; and can the Minister then explain to the House why his process is costing the taxpayer potentially millions of extra dollars that could have been sent to Christchurch?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000092\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002213e218e54f544950806dd0cf6a5f2ab4\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Before I call the Minister to answer, I tell the member that, of course, the select committee process is not the Minister\u2019s process. But in so far as the question can be answered by the Minister, I call the Hon Steven Joyce.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000093\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223008c563d3554411b2eab45a749bb515\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: Obviously, I was not at the select committee to hear whatever it was Mr Mackenzie is said to have said. But I think, taking it at face value, the point that it is important to have bipartisan support on these matters is important, because it ensures\u2014to the extent that we can\u2014that future Governments will take the same approach. Therefore I ask the member and his colleagues on the committee to deliberate carefully and, if possible, support the legislation.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000094\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u002269278d99734c467ba13b76ec6da04a16\u0022\u003EFonterra\u2014Trading Among Farmers Proposal\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022 data-id=\u0022e63f6d7c6e5e40fda49ede5a725af52f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000095\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E5. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e63f6d7c6e5e40fda49ede5a725af52f\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL (M\u0101ori Party\u2014Waiariki)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Agriculture: Is he concerned to learn that New Zealand\u2019s first majority M\u0101ori-owned dairy company, Miraka, has reportedly stated that there is a serious risk that Fonterra\u2019s proposed Trading Among Farmers exchange will be illiquid, volatile, and unstable; if so, what assurances can he give Miraka and other dairy processors and industry groups that anti-competitive behaviour will not be tolerated?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022 data-id=\u0022467cdb5dec0a45ec81e2983a48445665\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000096\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022467cdb5dec0a45ec81e2983a48445665\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER (Minister of Agriculture):\u003C/span\u003E I am aware of the concerns that have been raised by Miraka, and, indeed, I have agreed to meet the directors of Miraka next week. I take this opportunity to assure the member that for Trading Among Farmers to work the market will have to be deep, liquid, and stable. I have made that absolutely clear to Fonterra.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000097\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d202d91f90ea441f88311026a5fa8ed9\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: Is it the Government\u2019s intention to introduce a dairy industry restructuring amendment bill to the House this year to facilitate Fonterra\u2019s introduction of its Trading Among Farmers capital structure proposal; if so, will he invite the Commerce Commission to thoroughly examine this proposal in order to avoid the risk of anti-competitive behaviour that would continue to drive up the price of milk for New Zealanders?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000098\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002266623caa568b4d2c92cbaa9bd3b260c4\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: The answer to the first question is that, yes, it is the Government\u2019s intention to introduce legislation before the end of the year, although final decisions will be made only when the consultation phase has concluded. The legislation will proceed only if there is confidence from other investors within the dairy industry and from general financial investors. I agree with the member that for Trading Among Farmers to work it is absolutely vital that there is a method by which the price of milk is set fairly. It is vital that there is some transparency around the setting of that price. The final point is, in relation to the Commerce Commission, I am aware the commission has already made a submission on the current proposal. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000099\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002232997ee99332408083b8077f793b91b7\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: Is the Minister aware of concerns from Waikato\u2019s T\u0101tua dairy company about future raw milk pricing; if so, is he prepared to establish an independent milk price panel with representatives from the Commerce Commission and the Securities Commission, and with oversight by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, to achieve enhanced milk price regulation?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000100\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b6a04c19d84c4665b9015473af736c3f\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: I am not specifically aware of T\u0101tua\u2019s concern, but, again, it had the opportunity to make a submission. I expect that its concern is one that is shared generally by many in the dairy industry. The setting of the milk price is vital, and, as I said in answer to an earlier question, for Trading Amongst Farmers to work satisfactorily it will be essential that there is some transparency around it.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000101\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022471dee54-f59e-4497-b3d3-c39044ce7169\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222e9a6aa1bc90490289108006035838df\u0022\u003EHon Damien O\u2019Connor\u003C/span\u003E: Does he support the statement in his own report on domestic milk pricing that prices in the domestic market are also influenced by the structure of retail and wholesale markets; if so, can he explain the fact that although Australian farmers supply the same milk into the same international market, Australian consumers are now paying $1 per litre for milk and New Zealand consumers are having to pay up to $2.75 per litre; and will he do anything about it?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000102\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229c18af01e1b34d1c94b8165ebdfc7269\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: As the report the member referred to concludes, the dairy legislation\u2014and he was a vital part of it being passed by this House in 2001\u2014does provide for competition for the domestic milk sector. It does not ensure competition, and that is not a matter for me as the Minister of Agriculture, but, of course, it is a matter for the Commerce Commission. On the point regarding the Australian retail milk price, the member may be aware that milk is the subject of an intense price war between supermarket chains, with the suggestion that it is a loss-leader for some of those supermarket chains in Australia.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000103\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u002229f85dee25ef4452bc390ecf7a5df3bb\u0022\u003EEconomic Development, Acting Minister\u2014Duration of Appointment\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022 data-id=\u002249c928601d794bbc991819e879b09329\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000104\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E6. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002249c928601d794bbc991819e879b09329\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER (Labour)\u003C/span\u003E to the Acting Minister for Economic Development: Has he been advised by the Prime Minister whether his appointment as Acting Minister for Economic Development is temporary or expected to carry on to the election?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022 data-id=\u0022f12843d6a1704e31b303e80a2a2a3e21\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000105\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f12843d6a1704e31b303e80a2a2a3e21\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER (Acting Minister for Economic Development):\u003C/span\u003E No. I serve at the pleasure of the Prime Minister.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000106\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e98a7ca721fb4136aabd3fb440f2715b\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: Given that it appears that his appointment is at least for the foreseeable future, can he tell the House what new plans he has as Acting Minister for Economic Development to stop the slide in the New Zealand economy?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000107\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d06cf3ab8cc141a790c8efbf50e25f6b\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: I intend to follow the very strong focus of this Government on an economic growth agenda. We need to improve trade opportunities and we want to invest in innovation\u2014Labour opposes that. We intend to reform a lot of poor regulations\u2014Labour opposes that. We intend to improve skills\u2014Labour opposes that. We intend to spend more money on infrastructure\u2014Labour opposes that. We have already much improved the tax system\u2014Labour opposed that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000108\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226dda83f4ea2a48118d32f3f49e638fdb\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: Why does his Government still not take responsibility for New Zealand\u2019s slide when even business commentators are now saying: \u201CIf bombed-out economies such as the US and the UK are showing strong signs of investment-led recovery, why aren\u2019t we?\u201D \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000109\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229ee0b5ee5f144d3b94ed1f2dd2d2c8a2\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: The member who should take responsibility for the slide in New Zealand\u2019s economic performance is that member and his Government, who neglected the economy for 9 long years.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000110\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002273aa04a557b4460ab96a8550b07dd39e\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: Is the real reason for the economy not prospering that National\u2019s steps to transform the economy have been timid and have merely tinkered around the edges, when strong steps are needed to make new exports thrive?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000111\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002243ab75134e504be5923a97f1e810e6fc\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: Absolutely no.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000112\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002204259ad3b04248eca75facd99f754e35\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: Is the Minister saying that he is happy with the performance of the economy and the steps his Government has taken to date, given that even business commentators are saying that \u201CThe new recession is the Government\u2019s\u2014it must own up.\u201D? When will he own up?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000113\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e4b09a29-dfd3-42c0-8585-11463bd6077b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002262587d65deb64a019aed2f3c987b2465\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CARTER\u003C/span\u003E: No, I am not happy with the performance of the economy. But it is very evident to me that it takes a long, long time to turn round an economy that was so dramatically neglected by the previous Labour administration.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000114\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022aa17f19d76b94ed08e26704128c3fa15\u0022\u003EQuestion No. 4 to Minister\u2014Amended Answer\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022 data-id=\u00229876ffa66501411185dc15da0f976673\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000115\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229876ffa66501411185dc15da0f976673\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister for Communications and Information Technology):\u003C/span\u003E I seek leave to make a correction to an answer I gave to question No. 4 earlier.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000116\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ca68a6115ff04284802b26c4d97c96de\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought for the Minister to make a correction to an answer. Is there any objection to that course of action? There is no objection.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000117\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221ab3514402644b9cb20dd9caa5c73c5a\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: I transposed a date. Instead of 16 January I should have said 16 February.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000118\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221958fe80567a46bd86e9b5e15168bd6f\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I thank the Minister.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000119\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u002208fecce230f0437db127d41ded6c8748\u0022\u003EEarthquake, Christchurch\u2014Reopening of Schools and Early Childhood Education Centres\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002260200136-9d63-4a82-b4f5-c00411adb1fd\u0022 data-id=\u002253d2e95c39ed477a8c8a79daa73c1001\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000120\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002260200136-9d63-4a82-b4f5-c00411adb1fd\u0022\u003E7. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002253d2e95c39ed477a8c8a79daa73c1001\u0022\u003EJO GOODHEW (National\u2014Rangitata)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Education: What progress has been made on reopening Christchurch schools and early childhood education centres since the 22 February earthquake?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022977cccaf-581d-4f48-924e-32bf6c54a93d\u0022 data-id=\u002206d36c5ae6b246c1b0e92b9b18f91428\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000121\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022977cccaf-581d-4f48-924e-32bf6c54a93d\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002206d36c5ae6b246c1b0e92b9b18f91428\u0022\u003EHon ANNE TOLLEY (Minister of Education):\u003C/span\u003E By the end of yesterday 77 percent of all schools had reopened, and we currently expect that 94 percent of schools will be open by Monday of next week. In addition, 237 early childhood centres\u2014that is, 70 percent\u2014have opened in Christchurch, and by Monday of next week 265 are expected to be open.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000122\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002260200136-9d63-4a82-b4f5-c00411adb1fd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022970dea806538407a8edfb3d07a29a2c2\u0022\u003EJo Goodhew\u003C/span\u003E: What initiatives have been put in place for those children whose school has not yet reopened?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000123\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022977cccaf-581d-4f48-924e-32bf6c54a93d\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e866f275c7874a6e85aafa6cfc16f7c5\u0022\u003EHon ANNE TOLLEY\u003C/span\u003E: In addition to individual schools providing out-of-school learning initiatives, the Ministry of Education has set up 10 learning hubs and more will be set up if they are needed. These hubs are available for children in years 1 to 8 and provide a supervised learning environment. They are proving popular with children, and by 10 a.m. today 334 children had enrolled.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000124\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022a8b0aa062512475ab5f2fcd824dcd7e8\u0022\u003EHospitals, Public\u2014Sales\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022 data-id=\u0022d0e59e9bf98b4859a6336d926c3930e6\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000125\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E8. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d0e59e9bf98b4859a6336d926c3930e6\u0022\u003EGRANT ROBERTSON (Labour\u2014Wellington Central)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Health: Does he favour the sale of any public hospitals in New Zealand; if so, which one or ones?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022 data-id=\u00221c440f5caed043438652c9405ac7c56d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000126\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00221c440f5caed043438652c9405ac7c56d\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL (Minister of Health):\u003C/span\u003E The Government is not interested in selling public hospitals, as the Government is committed to growing and protecting the New Zealand public health services. However, that does not prevent existing buildings from being sold if a hospital moves to a better facility\u2014one that is better for patients. In Queenstown, for example, I am advised that the Southern District Health Board is looking at a number of options for improving services, including co-location on the existing hospital site or co-location on a new site in Queenstown. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000127\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224d329f15d77b4da6b9a631c20054a566\u0022\u003EGrant Robertson\u003C/span\u003E: Did he tell the Southern District Health Board chief executive, Brian Rousseau, that he supported the sale of Lakes District Hospital if a privately run medical centre was developed in its place in Queenstown?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022246dd4a763a043809d8477bce6346488\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL\u003C/span\u003E: No. The Queenstown district is one of the fastest-growing parts of New Zealand and is expecting an increasing demand, particularly from older people. Meeting this growing demand will require significant financial resources and the smart cooperation of the public and private services. As the Southern District Health Board works through the options, I am sure there will continue to be more publicly provided hospital services in Queenstown in the future.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000129\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226211646e59b54759a7e89c5cd6ff9f37\u0022\u003EGrant Robertson\u003C/span\u003E: Given that answer, was Mr Rousseau not telling the truth when he told local councillors on 3 March that he had the Minister\u2019s support for the sale of the hospital if a privately run medical centre was developed in Queenstown in its place?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000130\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bc47878a20254f3eab86af4cb1eb0f65\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL\u003C/span\u003E: I cannot verify what Mr Rousseau actually said. But I can tell the member that the Government has made it very clear to the Southern District Health Board that we think there need to be improved services for the people of Queenstown. They have been talking about that for\u2014it must be\u2014almost 20 years, and it is time the board got on with it.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000131\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022cfdabe42-521a-4dca-afab-3e781731a130\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022097bce128bc34ba3a52e0c227db6b8c9\u0022\u003EDr Paul Hutchison\u003C/span\u003E: What additional public hospital buildings has this Government invested in over the past 2 years?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000132\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fd08292e66494e2bb1be5f2760141fae\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL\u003C/span\u003E: The Government has approved more than a dozen hospital capital projects, totalling more than $500 million in the last 2 years: the Waikato Hospital acute medical precinct, at $30 million; Middlemore Hospital future growth, at $200 million; Lakeview emergency care centre at North Shore, at $48 million; Dunedin Hospital and Wakari Hospital upgrades, at $24 million; Greenlane surgical centre, at $24 million; Whakat\u0101ne Hospital, at $65 million; and on Friday $80 million for a new Taranaki Base Hospital was announced.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000133\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002262bc6de062574dd9951324ff4d20b8e6\u0022\u003EGrant Robertson\u003C/span\u003E: What guarantee can he give to Queenstown residents that their health services will be affordable, when the Queenstown Medical Centre is the driving force behind the privately run medical centre that is planned to replace the hospital, and when that centre is responsible for some of the highest after-hours medical fees in the country, including a $102 fee for a baby for an after-hours visit?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000134\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002288da48177ce04cf18be7f45ffd22d618\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL\u003C/span\u003E: That compares with some $200 when Labour was in office, according to Hansard. The guarantee that I would give to the people of Queenstown is that the district health board is currently consulting on a number of options, one of which is the co-location of services on the Queenstown hospital site. The other option is the co-location of services on a new modern facility, yet to be determined. Co-location was not uncommon under Labour, with private providers working alongside public services at Wairau Hospital, Wanganui Hospital, H\u0101wera Hospital, and Middlemore Hospital. Indeed, at Wairarapa Hospital there is a private hospital working in the public hospital, and the MidCentral District Health Board provides public health and mental health outpatient clinics out of a private hospital in Dannevirke. That was done under Labour.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000135\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022981498e4e17448a8a1ef6b8791154b03\u0022\u003EGrant Robertson\u003C/span\u003E: Will he follow through on his commitment that clinical leadership should be \u201Cfrom boardroom to bedside\u201D and ask the Southern District Health Board to take notice of the recommendations of the overwhelming majority of the clinical advisory group on the Queenstown proposal, who oppose the board\u2019s plan to have a privately run centre?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000136\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ecf8ead686cc40c595fc70c3708e64fc\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL\u003C/span\u003E: The Government\u2019s commitment to clinical leadership speaks volumes in the results that we are delivering for the people of the Southern District Health Board, with record levels of elective surgery, faster cancer treatment, and faster emergency departments.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000137\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022cd0be45bcdba4b6680f820d14dafad98\u0022\u003EEarthquake, Christchurch\u2014Department of Building and Housing Advice\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022badb0a39-849c-462a-b32f-77fc017c9fc2\u0022 data-id=\u0022b063076b9fa946a0adfe574d7bd62074\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000138\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022badb0a39-849c-462a-b32f-77fc017c9fc2\u0022\u003E9. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b063076b9fa946a0adfe574d7bd62074\u0022\u003ESIMON BRIDGES (National\u2014Tauranga)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister for Building and Construction: What advice has he received from the Department of Building and Housing regarding last month\u2019s Christchurch earthquake?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a11ce4e-9fb3-4738-b0be-5a9f81d975da\u0022 data-id=\u00227629f5c351644faf8dded46d63e610bb\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000139\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a11ce4e-9fb3-4738-b0be-5a9f81d975da\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00227629f5c351644faf8dded46d63e610bb\u0022\u003EHon MAURICE WILLIAMSON (Minister for Building and Construction):\u003C/span\u003E The Department of Building and Housing has commenced an investigation into the performance of some key buildings in Christchurch in last month\u2019s earthquake. The investigation will include the CTV building, the Pyne Gould building, the Forsyth Barr building, and, indeed, the Hotel Grand Chancellor. The department will investigate why these buildings collapsed or suffered serious damage in last month\u2019s quake by gathering information on the original design and construction of the buildings, the impact of any alterations to those buildings, and how they performed in the September fore-quake. The investigation will also consider how the current building code compares with overseas codes for earthquakes. The department\u2019s investigation is separate from the royal commission of inquiry announced by the Prime Minister on Monday. However, the technical information provided by the departmental investigation will inform and assist the royal commission of inquiry. The investigation will proceed as quickly as possible. However, this is an important task and it is vital that we get it right.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000140\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022badb0a39-849c-462a-b32f-77fc017c9fc2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221d84aa25a5fb4b919cc495b49785e057\u0022\u003ESimon Bridges\u003C/span\u003E: How can people contribute any information they have on these buildings to the Department of Building and Housing?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000141\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a11ce4e-9fb3-4738-b0be-5a9f81d975da\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002238834b1c2a4b4a06a53037f6d6d689c4\u0022\u003EHon MAURICE WILLIAMSON\u003C/span\u003E: The department wants to hear from people who have firsthand accounts from working in these buildings or who have photographs or video footage that will assist the inquiry. Anybody who has such information can contact the department on 0800 242 243 or email it to chchinvestigation@dbh.govt.nz.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000142\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00220b38e13ad25f49aa8c216255a12bbab1\u0022\u003EMinimum Wage Review\u2014Factors Considered\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022 data-id=\u0022f871b24128304588a4c7ab9d9e680a0e\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000143\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E10. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f871b24128304588a4c7ab9d9e680a0e\u0022\u003EDARIEN FENTON (Labour)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Labour: What factors did she consider in deciding to increase the minimum wage by 25c from 1 April in her latest review?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022 data-id=\u0022f94859eca1634b25b38c555eded6d979\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000144\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f94859eca1634b25b38c555eded6d979\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON (Minister of Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I considered a range of factors, as set out in the Cabinet paper, which is available on the Department of Labour\u2019s website. Some of the factors I considered were the impacts on unemployment, job creation, and low-paid workers. I concluded that in difficult economic times a cautious approach was required and that protecting jobs was paramount.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000145\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222a6f66b0e72945aca9f1c6e5ef50911b\u0022\u003EDarien Fenton\u003C/span\u003E: Will the 100,000 people on or near the minimum wage find it easier or harder to meet the rising cost of living after her 25c increase in the minimum wage, given that the Department of Labour advised her that the increase does not constitute a real increase in the minimum wage?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000146\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022252b84a7e6ed464f9b16c04bc2d64197\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: I think the important factor is that they will have a job. If Labour had its way, they would not have a job, and it would be even more difficult for them to meet the costs of living.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000147\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022aace65d3611940bd9bcf8bf159383845\u0022\u003EDarien Fenton\u003C/span\u003E: Did she consider the Department of Labour\u2019s advice that increasing the minimum wage to $13.50, which would put $76 million into the pockets of 100,000 Kiwis, would have a negligible effect on total employment and thus would not be likely to constrain the job market?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000148\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a4135c2d46664eebbd87f9ccbfa0700b\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: I considered the advice, but I was not willing to put at risk the between 480 and 640 jobs that might have been lost had we increased the minimum wage to $13.50.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000149\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220e23e3214540485882ccf826559cd000\u0022\u003EDarien Fenton\u003C/span\u003E: Why did she not increase the wage to at least $13.50 when it would have put an extra $76 million into the pockets of low-paid Kiwis and into the economy at a time when those Kiwis are struggling to meet rapidly rising food, petrol, childcare, health, and other costs?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000150\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022aa9b5b4a9ca34ad9bf844c0b06e8f06a\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: As I have said, protecting jobs was a paramount consideration. We looked at what we considered was the most sustainable, realistic, and fair option, and we did not want to risk the loss of 600 jobs.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000151\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225ba3da8ab9e64e8e95b54586e4cbd584\u0022\u003EDarien Fenton\u003C/span\u003E: Is she concerned by the fact that the National Government\u2019s increases to the minimum wage have consistently been lower than increases to the average wage, meaning that the poorest Kiwis are falling further and further behind?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000152\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022277a9de312b0482d85ae3a378c9ea02b\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: I can say that since being elected into Government we have increased the minimum wage by $40 a week. At the end of the day it is a matter of finding a balance and getting the most sustainable, realistic, and fair option whilst protecting jobs.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000153\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00225b0fe73092574aba93fd6241022644d5\u0022\u003EQuestion No. 8 to Minister\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022 data-id=\u0022194e959cce1d4c678f3bd4115841c23c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000154\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022194e959cce1d4c678f3bd4115841c23c\u0022\u003EGRANT ROBERTSON (Labour\u2014Wellington Central):\u003C/span\u003E I omitted to do this earlier. I seek leave of the House to table a document prepared by the Wakatipu Health Trust. It is a question and answer document that includes the statement that the Southern District Health Board chief, Brian Rousseau, told the mayor that he had the Minister of Health\u2019s support for the sale of Lakes District Hospital.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000155\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228755efc9bcd6478b88dafead5d20e32a\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought to table this document. Is there any objection? There is no objection.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000156\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EDocument, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000157\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022ae08cb20dc0248f8a6abadd888e80497\u0022\u003ERoading Projects, Hawke\u2019s Bay\u2014Progress\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022 data-id=\u00225a925650814745fcb22fbcdf2f4fdd9c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000158\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022\u003E11. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225a925650814745fcb22fbcdf2f4fdd9c\u0022\u003ECHRIS TREMAIN (National\u2014Napier)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Transport: What progress has been made on roading projects in the Hawke\u2019s Bay region?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022 data-id=\u0022e6f753f8de134dcd9a113cd1c7081af9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000159\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e6f753f8de134dcd9a113cd1c7081af9\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE (Minister of Transport):\u003C/span\u003E Heaps. I was privileged last Friday to open the first two roading projects, completed thanks to the Government\u2019s 2009 half-billion-dollar jobs and growth stimulus package. The first to open was over 12 months ahead of schedule\u2014the Matah\u014Drua Gorge realignment on State Highway 2 between Napier and Gisborne. The 3-kilometre alignment removes the sharp twists of the old route, eliminating closures and delays caused by adverse weather or crashes. This will have significant benefits for all road users. The project was completed on time and under budget due to the contractor\u2019s innovative bridge design and construction. Over 140 workers were on site for the course of the construction, and its completion is a tribute to all stakeholders.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000160\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bbded2ec-ac25-4a73-a380-3f4d87693084\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224d20c71754d54e518d8c3d92f8d1fc80\u0022\u003EStuart Nash\u003C/span\u003E: What reason did the Minister give to Alan Dick, the then-chair of the Hawke\u2019s Bay Regional Council, when he summoned him to Wellington last year to tell him he was taking away the $71 million raised through Hawke\u2019s Bay excise tax from the New Zealand Transport Agency fund for Hawke\u2019s Bay, to spend it on roading infrastructure in Hawke\u2019s Bay?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000161\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225d6b1fdc9d8744b4b0b944a62f250ca0\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: That question is wrong on so many levels. I point out to the member that the Government has invested substantially more in State highway construction than the previous Government was planning to spend\u2014billions more over the next 10 years; $3 billion to $4 billion I think, from memory\u2014and it has not been taking funding away from Hawke\u2019s Bay. It is investing very significantly right around the country much greater funding than the previous Government was intending to invest.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000162\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bbded2ec-ac25-4a73-a380-3f4d87693084\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022544af26a16a9463ab4e00d8751148a19\u0022\u003EStuart Nash\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I want to clarify: is that what he told Alan Dick when\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000163\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bf0edbcbef924eeb8dbd9c7bd7d0f9fc\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: That is not a point of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000164\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225adf3b4b7b3d44c99bd31173206b5fef\u0022\u003ECraig Foss\u003C/span\u003E: What improvements have been made to the Hawke\u2019s Bay Expressway due to the Government\u2019s transport stimulus project?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000165\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a244152-977c-48d2-bf53-4f3a369a27a9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b9637b9fc27b4f6393d97397bc0daaec\u0022\u003EHon STEVEN JOYCE\u003C/span\u003E: More good news! The Hawke\u2019s Bay Expressway southern extension was the second project opened last Friday following its acceleration by the Government\u2019s half-billion-dollar jobs and growth package. The southern extension is the last piece of the expressway, which has been on the book since the 1960s. Its completion better connects Hastings, Napier, and the airport, and removes two busy intersections as well as a crash black spot. There were over 170 workers on site during the course of construction. The project provided local jobs and contributed to the economy during the economic downturn. The completion of these projects is great news for the locals, but it is just part of a wider multimillion-dollar investment that the Government has made in new State highway construction in the Hawke\u2019s Bay region under the current National Land Transport Programme.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000166\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022aa17988cf8144e05973e352afe8fa5b0\u0022\u003EEconomy\u2014Oil Dependence\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022 data-id=\u002275534b89c5e248e9b2fcf446a17e7ab9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000167\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E12. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002275534b89c5e248e9b2fcf446a17e7ab9\u0022\u003EGARETH HUGHES (Green)\u003C/span\u003E to the Minister of Finance: What steps, if any, is he taking to reduce New Zealand\u2019s economic vulnerability that stems from dependence on oil?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022 data-id=\u0022118522db023140c99247acef0e9ab32d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000168\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022118522db023140c99247acef0e9ab32d\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH (Minister of Finance):\u003C/span\u003E The Government is moving to ensure that in the light of any number of potential international pressures or economic shocks we have a resilient economy where price changes flow through quickly and people have the opportunity to adapt to those price changes, as they will if the price of oil continues to rise.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000169\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d02f39a0e56f4721b1635fef12ecddc5\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: Is he aware of the UK Government\u2019s recent carbon plan, which sets out a number of Government actions that will reduce the UK\u2019s economic dependence on oil, and why does New Zealand not have such a plan?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000170\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c6cc6b712d214c71901c3c6febfdd95b\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: New Zealand had some kind of carbon plan that was put together by the last Government, but the analysis I saw of it showed that it set out very expensive ways of reducing carbon. We actually favour the emissions trading system, which I know the Greens favour, as well.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000171\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222ba4ab7c5a15421aa39c3a1cde220593\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: Is the Minister aware of the Dunedin City Council\u2019s peak oil vulnerability analysis report, which identifies local government actions to prepare for high oil prices? Why is the National Government not undertaking a similar analysis?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000172\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ff7146ab9fae4a01b4a142061655261e\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: I have not been aware of that report, but it is likely that it will not be particularly effective, judging from the title of it and the fact that a local council has very little opportunity to actually influence the Western World\u2019s vulnerability due to its use of oil.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000173\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022444db7cbdfc142ca9b0c1ec321e29110\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: Will the Minister act on the recommendations of the 2008 New Zealand Transport Agency report Managing transport challenges when oil prices rise, which advises the Government to cease all new motorway building until Government funding and regulations that increase our dependence on oil have been removed?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000174\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022313cef91fdde495c8b288ea5d87ebd6e\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: I expect that under this Government\u2019s programme to upgrade our roading infrastructure, people will have more choices\u2014for instance, to catch buses. I would be interested in discussing the issue with the Greens. A successful public transport system will certainly rely on buses as the main form of public transport. Buses need roads that are not totally congested, otherwise they cannot provide a service to the public.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000175\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022180a75bea1104a93b42f8b816b978cd3\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: What percentage of commuter bus services does he expect to use the Waikato Expressway, the P\u016Bhoi to Wellsford \u201CHoliday Highway\u201D, or any of the other five planned motorway projects? Does he not agree that investment in buses and trains would make the existing road network more efficient than new motorways?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000176\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002273e6e84cad234cb1a49eac4807f12f13\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: The Waikato Expressway is a vital infrastructural artery for our export economy. Although commuters have interests and the Government needs to invest in transport infrastructure to meet their needs, it is actually more important that we have an economy that can earn and be competitive in the world. That is why we focus on some infrastructure outside of the main cities.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000177\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227175c96781784089874b57848f87e21d\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: How can New Zealanders respond to price signals and change their travel behaviour, when his Government is prioritising $10 billion on expensive motorways over other essential public transport projects such as the Auckland central business district rail loop?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000178\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d3db47c331a74fb9ab177ee1af84e967\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: A feature of the Government\u2019s programme is that it has maintained a significant investment in public transport such as the Auckland rail network and the Wellington commuter rail network, alongside a significant investment in roads. We believe the combination of the two will lift our productivity and increase the prospects of sustainable economic growth in the future. We accept, of course, that rising oil prices and rising petrol prices may well change behaviours. People are making those decisions one by one right now. We do not believe an overall bureaucratic plan will do a better job of adapting than individual New Zealanders can do.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000179\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225d233022336342dc914c2bc423ab30e2\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: Given that oil makes up 16 percent of our imports and 99 percent of our transport fuels, why is the Government failing to act responsibly by developing a national strategy to reduce our oil dependency, as many other countries and local councils are doing?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000180\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022bb158206-360b-4757-8d72-f7d0994e1fb3\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d1fa9fb2dc444a88bf9bfa21a6a02fa6\u0022\u003EHon BILL ENGLISH\u003C/span\u003E: Because we do not see a strategy as a replacement for action. I know that that is a radical change in approach from a New Zealand Government. Every day New Zealanders are making decisions to change their behaviour based on changes in the oil price, and we think that largely they are making pretty sensible decisions. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000181\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022939d52a9a2b94859bbc0910f0bf555fa\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: I seek leave to table two documents. The first is a letter, revealed under the Official Information Act, from the New Zealand Transport Agency that states there has been no modelling of high oil prices\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000182\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f1062cc495e64166a8d899d067c1885f\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is no objection. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000183\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EDocument, by leave, laid on the Table of the House.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000184\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002255bb390e-f6c3-498c-bbf6-ea1a8fc993c7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002296ffea02d1e84759a189354af3a4d5db\u0022\u003EGareth Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: The second document I seek leave to table is the research report 357, commissioned by the New Zealand Transport Agency, entitled Managing transport challenges when oil prices rise, which recommends ceasing spending on the motorways.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000185\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002220ff355cd8384447914e64523ad628a1\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought to table that document. Is there any objection? There is objection. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000186\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022be997b1463fa4281acbe1b732ef67962\u0022\u003EQuestions to Members\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000187\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u002219467b2dcc094ec99648b2606b0061d1\u0022\u003ETelecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill\u2014Submissions Received\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000188\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E1. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002281f16b12c08d4572b5f408e7d7bfab59\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour\u2014New Lynn)\u003C/span\u003E to the Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee: How many submissions have been received so far on the Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022 data-id=\u0022f3ff503773794a3aa1e7891f2b4ca2d4\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000189\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f3ff503773794a3aa1e7891f2b4ca2d4\u0022\u003ECRAIG FOSS (Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee): \u003C/span\u003EThirty-three submissions have been lodged.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000190\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223e2ae0ce7fd74d7289a78ded5dad3110\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: How many minutes has he allocated for the oral hearing of each submission that submitters wish to be heard? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000191\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d8b127fc4d6644db9b19b57616dedd01\u0022\u003ECRAIG FOSS\u003C/span\u003E: I do not allocate the minutes. That is a matter for the committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000192\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022dd3eb9e72e504035bb95d4a81ccda3ec\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I took the liberty of taking the advice of the Clerk in relation to this supplementary question, and under the Standing Orders it is the responsibility of the chairperson to set the agenda and the timetable for the committee. I understand that my supplementary question is in order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000193\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229e2591d183794dcb9384a2fb2f96942b\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: To respond to the point of order that has been raised, I advise that the chairperson can set time limits for submissions. Of course, likewise the committee can make those decisions. If the chair has made the decision, the chair can answer it. If the committee has made the decision, it is a matter for the committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000194\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002225b03cf32965496d9485d0133124dcfa\u0022\u003ECRAIG FOSS\u003C/span\u003E: Just for clarification, I say that an indicative 10 minutes was allocated to help our agenda through this week. As we know, this morning we heard about five or six submissions, the longest of which took 40 minutes. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000195\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022030a755131704255be7eb6004478c2fa\u0022\u003ETelecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill\u2014Requests for Oral Submissions\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000196\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b25655ae1c4147c8b4d9c15d68bbe1d2\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Question No. 2, the Hon David Cunliffe.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000197\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002262c55c9add33419ba3e2bc0bcf76b86d\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Because the Opposition fought for it. My question is to the Chairperson\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000198\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f2d1ae9c55734ced97bf0e239c278604\u0022\u003EHon Members\u003C/span\u003E: Oh!\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000199\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223c310b632f5d4dcd8aedadf6987375ea\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I did not hear what the member said, but obviously it caused disorder. I ask him to please just ask question No. 2. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000200\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E2. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a58677449fb7476994b11de891bd5491\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour\u2014New Lynn)\u003C/span\u003E to the Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee: How many submitters on the Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill have requested an oral hearing?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022 data-id=\u00226b0bab6800c64cdcba1c02f3341128cc\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000201\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226b0bab6800c64cdcba1c02f3341128cc\u0022\u003ECRAIG FOSS (Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee): \u003C/span\u003ETwenty-four submitters have requested an oral hearing. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000202\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223ba3ebd099fb48fdb92c8e5c4248d551\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Is the chairperson satisfied that the committee has provided sufficient time to hear and consider all those submissions before the report-back date of 16 May? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000203\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f97cc28d698d4c2589686d58ef99c7d7\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: What the committee does is not a matter the\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000204\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cfeacb3a70204f109c20441dce50f121\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I have before me a Hansard transcript of questions to members, including a question to the chairperson of the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee, of 14 September 2010, when an almost identical question by my colleague Darien Fenton was allowed to be asked of the chairperson, David Bennett. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000205\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002288071933d1914675a29b9d0cf62f1021\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: If I erred on that occasion, I apologise to the House, but the chairperson is not responsible for decisions of the committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000206\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u00224e92f9d3c8c04d72bb61664a7377a2a0\u0022\u003ETelecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill\u2014Times Allocated for Oral Submissions\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000207\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E3. \u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220310564120a34a349911c8b69af2cf55\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour\u2014New Lynn)\u003C/span\u003E to the Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee: Is he aware of any complaints about times allocated to submitters on the Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband, and Other Matters) Amendment Bill?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022 data-id=\u002238af6d597ae240bf931dd950be1b96d7\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000208\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022659f6556-09a1-4ead-bc52-05cbdb4eaab8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002238af6d597ae240bf931dd950be1b96d7\u0022\u003ECRAIG FOSS (Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee): \u003C/span\u003EYes, I am. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000209\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002298ab034b8a194ecba27f7530b45f1cf9\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: Why is he attempting to ram through complex technical submissions on a huge and complex bill\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000210\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b69dbba1cb504469884562b2bea4782e\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Order!\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000211\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002218cda19d158b4a2792bc8a8a6287fe82\u0022\u003EHon David Cunliffe\u003C/span\u003E: \u2014in only 1 week\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000212\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d93d582b4fdc4694b0d128e21f28acde\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: What was it about my being on my feet that the member did not see? I ask the member to please not do that again. When I get to my feet, members will resume their seat. That is one of the absolute rules I require. The member knows that that question was not in order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n    \u003C/div\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022HpsHansard\u0022\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000213\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsProceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00220e0e5327dc6f40e7a152157e1155bd79\u0022\u003EGeneral Debate\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000215\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u002256f9c23834f44431bac6899eba98e52f\u0022\u003EGeneral Debate\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022 data-id=\u002243585dacf33a4b8ab7f5d778e35e2d18\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000214\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002243585dacf33a4b8ab7f5d778e35e2d18\u0022\u003EHon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Police):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the House take note of miscellaneous business. I begin by acknowledging the tragedy in Japan in the last week. The fact that our friends in Japan have had an earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear threat is one of those tragedies that many of us thought was not even an option when we had our own tragedy on 22 February this year. Despite this terrible time we know that the thoughts of the people of New Zealand and the world are with the people of Japan as they go through this terrible situation. It was bad enough having the earthquake, but then came the tsunami. We saw on various news reports images of houses and people who had been swept away by the tsunami\u2014everything was just swept away in its path\u2014but now they have this nuclear threat. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000216\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003EWhen we had our own tragedy on 22 February, Japan was one of the first countries to offer us assistance, and I can remember on 24 February, on the Thursday after the earthquake, seeing the Japanese urban search and rescue team coming down to the CTV building to help go through the rubble to see whether they could find anybody alive. I spoke with one of the doctors who were with the urban search and rescue team from Japan. Extraordinarily professional people were in that team, and they worked really hard, and they have now had to go back to Japan to respond to their own tragedy.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000217\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003EThe aftershock on 22 February brought out the very best in our people, and I think that is something that we can be very proud of. It has also brought out the very best in our Christchurch-based members of Parliament across the House who, I note in the Press today, are still holding clinics and trying to do the best that they can to help their constituents. On a non-partisan basis I congratulate them on keeping on doing the job that they are paid to do and we expect them to do.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000218\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003EI would also like to make a comment about the fund-raising in New Zealand. Never has an Aucklander seen so many pro-Canterbury people and really dyed-in-the-wool Cantabrians as we have over this matter. We have had fund-raising from one end of the country to the other. We have had fund-raising all over the world by people who have been sending us help.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000219\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003EWhen I look at some of the very best of our people, I think back to 24 February when I met a young constable. He had been with the New Zealand Police for 6 months and his job was to take me around some of the places where there were dead people and where all sorts of work was going on. He had 6 months\u2019 experience and I asked him how his house was. He said it was destroyed. It had gone back to the swamp. The area had been drained but it had gone back to a swamp. His house was covered in liquefaction and debris. He had a wife and young baby, and he said: \u201CBut we\u2019re all right.\u201D, so I asked him why he was all right. He told me that his wife had made good friends at Plunket and one of them had taken his family in. Rather than being home, or looking after his own property or his own family, he was at work\u2014where we would expect him to be because he is a professional and he is one of our finest.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000220\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002285ec30d4-6394-433a-a12e-2c4def705dd0\u0022\u003EAs we went around the central area of Christchurch in a marked police car, we were stopped by various people. They came to ask him for help. Some people asked him for water, so he popped the boot of the car and out came some water bottles for the people. We were asked for petrol, and he let them know where he thought the next open petrol station was. When we were at the chambers in Christchurch, where all the civil defence people were working, he was approached by a young girl who wanted an asthma inhaler. Her asthma inhaler was on the fifth floor of an apartment building down the road, and it was far too unsafe for her to go in there. He went off to look, and then he went and let her know where to find an asthma inhaler. I looked at that young man\u2014members know how it is; we get a bit older and all policemen start to look so young\u2014and I realised that nobody was asking the people in suits; they were asking the police officers. I would like to congratulate them on the most excellent work they have done through this terrible time. I thank all of our emergency services, our urban search and rescue people, and everybody else. They have done a marvellous job.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022 data-id=\u002293f530dd10af4110a838ec4517ceef5d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000221\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002293f530dd10af4110a838ec4517ceef5d\u0022\u003EHon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour\u2014New Lynn):\u003C/span\u003E I begin by joining with the previous speaker, the Minister of Police, in acknowledging the suffering of the Japanese people following the 9.0 earthquake in Sendai, the devastating tsunami, and the current crisis with the nuclear facilities in Fukushima. A year ago today I was in Japan as a guest of Government in Tokyo and in the Yamaguchi prefecture, where my father had served in J-force to assist post-war reconstruction. I must say I feel, at a very personal level, the suffering of the Japanese people today. New Zealanders know what Japan is going through; Japan was with us in our suffering in Christchurch. We commend the decision of the Government to dispatch an urban search and rescue team to Japan to assist in their struggle. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000222\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003EAll New Zealanders are still struggling with the aftermath of the Christchurch earthquake, and Labour supports every effort to help them through that. We know that Government agencies, on behalf of all Kiwis, have played a remarkable and an honourable role in that relief effort. Beyond that, we have seen the best of New Zealanders over the last 3 weeks: the man who pumped the water out of his well on to the street so his neighbours could quench their thirst, neighbours helping neighbours, people providing food and services free of charge, relief centres, and search and rescue personnel. All of it proves that New Zealanders have a quiet strength in adversity and are prepared to do the hard yards to rebuild our city and our country. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000223\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003ESomeone said to me that if we could only bottle that spirit of rebuilding Christchurch and use it to rebuild New Zealand, we would be better off. I join with that person in expressing that hope. But that is where it becomes difficult, unfortunately, because the reality is that even before the earthquake New Zealand was going backwards. Growth in the third quarter of last year was negative. Treasury and the Reserve Bank say that growth in the fourth quarter was zero or negative. Unemployment is at recent record levels and apparently rising again. Meantime, food prices and petrol prices are rising, and people have not had wage rises, or they got a puny 25c increase in the minimum wage. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000224\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003EAll around the country, and not just in Christchurch, New Zealand families are in crisis. It is a crisis because they do not know how they will make ends meet. It is a crisis because they cannot put petrol in the car or food on the table. They face the devil\u2019s choice between taking their kids to the doctor and putting the budget together for the groceries. At the same time, Government debt was blowing out and Government services were being compressed. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000225\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003EWhy is all of that happening? The bottom line is that this Government does not have a strong, structural, and sustainable plan for turning the economy round. This is no time for petty point-scoring; I am not trying to do that. But I ask, on behalf of all New Zealanders, whether it is not time that we had a recovery and rebuild plan for our whole economy, as well as for the great city of Christchurch. If strong Government leadership is appropriate after a disaster, surely strong Government leadership is appropriate when our country is in the biggest economic crisis it has faced in decades. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000226\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003EThe Government does not have a plan. Cutting more services from the Government simply puts more people out of work and undermines confidence. Failing to address the underlying imbalances in the property sector, in the savings gap, and in the investment gap simply means it takes longer to turn business round. When business lacks confidence because they do not know the plan, they cannot hire, and they are reluctant to invest. That means that people stay out of work and wages stay down. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000227\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e0192ed9-5715-4f6c-bd52-8db4f3466087\u0022\u003EAs Wilkinson and Pickett in The Spirit Level pointed out, we are all in this together. When we share the gains and share the pain we are all better off than if we have a society of haves and have-nots, where a few at the top do better and better and most in the middle and the bottom do worse. It is not sufficient to rely on a relationship with a few well-placed mates\u2014the Mark Weldons, the Rob Fyfes, the Fonterras, the Telecoms, and the MediaWorks of the world\u2014to fill the gap, because it does not make the difference. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022 data-id=\u0022675c08049e304080a89adc65f1ce175b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000228\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022675c08049e304080a89adc65f1ce175b\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON (Minister of Conservation):\u003C/span\u003E Firstly, I add my voice to the voices of others in the House who have acknowledged the tragedy that has struck Japan\u2014that they have potentially lost more then 10,000 people in this disaster is absolutely horrific. It has been incredibly difficult to come to terms with the number of lives we have lost in Canterbury, but we simply cannot comprehend the pain we would feel had we lost anywhere near the number of people that Japan has lost. Our thoughts and prayers are certainly with them as they go through a rebuilding stage, as well. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000229\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003EWhilst the eyes of the world are quite rightly focused on the volatile situation in Japan, we continue to forge ahead with the recovery and rebuilding of Christchurch. I congratulate\u2014with some disappointment, I have to say\u2014Auckland on getting the Canterbury Rugby World Cup 2011 games. It has just been announced. This will be a disappointment and an emotional blow for rugby-mad Cantabrians\u2014and I am one of them\u2014but at least now we can move on and look at the big and bigger picture of rebuilding Christchurch and Canterbury. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000230\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003ENo one is disputing that rebuilding Christchurch, and indeed Canterbury, will be a long road and a difficult task. It will be many months before the central business district will be safe and secure enough for construction to begin. At this point we simply do not know how long it will take to return the city to the buzzing, vibrant metropolis that it was prior to the September and February quakes. I had an interesting walk\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000231\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c52dd401c8564b259d9079c0d4daba89\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. I am not sure whether one is meant to do this immediately or at the end of a speech, so I thought I had better do it immediately in case I missed the chance. If the Minister was speaking from an official document when she spoke in respect of the Rugby World Cup, I require that document to be tabled. If it is just her speech notes, then, of course, I cannot. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000232\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228dc8c6ee20e445dbac226e3a49daafb8\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: As I recollect the Standing Orders, if the Minister is quoting from a document that is just referring to an issue, there is no requirement at all. I will refer to the Minister to make sure that I am not getting this wrong. Was the Minister quoting from an official document?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000233\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222b728a4470e64257ab3784a7dff1de31\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: No, I am referring to a 3 News breaking announcement.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000234\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220d7bf2bc16c94bbf8cd5ecc567fa2806\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: That is in order. That sorts the matter out.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000235\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228ef2090e9bbb494cb4b0b1d5ab1b43db\u0022\u003EHon KATE WILKINSON\u003C/span\u003E: As I was saying, I had an interesting walk around the central business district on Sunday with the urban search and rescue engineer. Although the devastation is horrific, there are some positives. It is interesting to see how the earthquake has affected ordinary lives. There are daily tasks that Cantabrians can no longer do. There are basic tasks that they cannot do, but there are also other simple tasks, and they are asking where the dentist is, where the hairdresser is, and where the shop where they used to do their shopping is. Those simple things will take a long time to heal. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000236\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003EBut there are some positives, and I want to dwell a wee bit on the positives. Without doubt, there were some buildings that, as the engineer, probably professionally, said, \u201Cmisbehaved\u201D, but some others actually withstood the shakes and held up. I think we have to take some strength from the fact that some of those buildings had been earthquake-strengthened, and it was pleasing to see that the strengthening did work. Some buildings look OK, but they are not. Some buildings look bad, but they are OK. What is also interesting is the random nature of the damage. It is, I think, very difficult to comprehend. What we do know is that there is not a single person in this country who is not behind the people of Canterbury, and as a Cantabrian I thank the nation for that. People know that a thriving and successful Canterbury is crucial to New Zealand\u2019s future. Cantabrians know it, and they are determined to reclaim their lives and their city. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000237\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003EEach day there is a constant reminder of how amazing our communities in New Zealand are, how strong they are, how resilient they are, and how generous they are. There are simply not enough superlatives to describe how highly I regard the volunteers who worked tirelessly for days and weeks on end. Despite the overwhelming chaos they were faced with, they just got on with it one step at a time, and they have been truly remarkable. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000238\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003EThe Government has a mammoth task ahead of it to provide all the possible support it can to the Canterbury region. I believe that Friday\u2019s memorial is an important event for the region. Huge numbers of people have not stopped even once to reflect on what has happened. They have not been able to, not when they can see how much is still to be done. This is true not only for the general public but also for our policemen, firefighters, doctors, nurses, civil defence staff, and many others. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000239\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022136da8c4-afc7-483e-a39c-c66812f71774\u0022\u003EThe focus of this year must be on planning the way forward for Christchurch and for Canterbury, but Friday is about taking a step back and stopping to recognise the huge emotional impact the earthquake has had on all of us. It will be tough, but I strongly believe it will help. I also commend the cooperation between the schools; their effort is superb. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022 data-id=\u002282e58e79faa6417c9e02ba75cfd139e6\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000240\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002282e58e79faa6417c9e02ba75cfd139e6\u0022\u003EGRANT ROBERTSON (Labour\u2014Wellington Central):\u003C/span\u003E I, too, join with other colleagues to express my thoughts and sympathies to the people of Japan, who are facing the aftermath of the earthquake, the tsunami, and now the nuclear fallout from the explosions at the power plants and the resulting radiation. It is a time when people across the world are looking to provide support to the people of Japan as they deal with a crisis that I fear will be playing out for many, many years. Obviously, all members in the House will provide our support to whatever New Zealand can do.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000241\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EI will add also to other colleagues\u2019 comments about our ongoing support for the people of Christchurch and Canterbury. It is indeed very sad to learn this afternoon that the Rugby World Cup games will not be played in Christchurch this year. Just to clarify some of Minister Wilkinson\u2019s comments before, I think the quarter-final games will be going to Auckland, but the pool games that Christchurch was to host will be spread to other venues. I hope that venues in the South Island are considered for those pool games in terms of the overall economic benefit that will come from them.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000242\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EI note that it is a real shame that the Government, which has quite clearly been aware of this decision for some time now, has not been as upfront with the people of Canterbury as it may well have been. I think the performance we saw in the House today from Mr Joyce did not reflect well on the Government in terms of being upfront with the people of Canterbury, who deserve, given everything that they have been through, for the Government to take that upfront approach with them. I think that stands as a shame in this House today.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000243\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EI refer today to a report undertaken by Regional Public Health in Wellington called Food Costs for Families. This report was produced just after the GST increase last year. Essentially, the report goes through and talks about what percentage of a family\u2019s income they need to spend to create a healthy diet for their family, using the Otago University\u2019s Food Cost Survey as the basis. Essentially, the paper states that New Zealanders, on average, spend about 16 percent of their income on food. There is international research to say that if people are spending 25 percent or more of their disposable income on food they can be moving into food stress, which is experienced by everybody who is spending more than 30 percent of their income on food.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000244\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EThe survey shows that in Wellington a family with breadwinners on the minimum wage with two children will spend 34 percent of their income before rental payments, or 50 percent of their income after rental payments, on food. That puts them well above the international norms and well into the category of food stress. A beneficiary family with two children will be spending 52 percent of their income on food or 66 percent of their after-rent income in order to get a healthy diet. It goes up even more for a beneficiary family who is in private accommodation rather than in Housing New Zealand Corporation accommodation.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000245\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EThose are the pressures on families out there today. Rising food costs and the rising impact of the increase on the rate of GST mean that these people are spending a far greater percentage of their income to get a healthy diet than they possibly can afford. The consequences of families not being able to provide healthy food at an affordable price are long term. They are long term for the individuals and the families concerned in terms of issues like obesity and poor nutrition, but they are also long term for the whole country. The economic and social costs of the outcomes for people with poor nutrition and poor health are enormous.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000246\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226007dc96-f459-4cdd-9972-4fde2c994088\u0022\u003EThat is why this Government is being irresponsible and out of touch if it does not accept that people are facing enormous increases in their cost of living. The Government is out of touch when the Prime Minister says that it is a lifestyle choice to go to a food bank\u2014it is not. The cost of living in this country and the cost of putting healthy food on the table is getting out of hand. Beneficiary families and families on the minimum wage\u2014working families\u2014are struggling to make ends meet. This Government is out of touch if it thinks that that is a lifestyle choice for those people. The cost of living is impacting right across the board. If I look only in the health sector I see that general practitioner fees are up 6.5 percent, and there are after-hours costs of over $100 for a child in Queenstown, $129 for an older child, and $139 for an adult. These kinds of costs are unacceptable. This Government is out of touch, and it needs to realise that the cost of living is going up.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022 data-id=\u00228a60bab943954d419471056b5b100ba1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000247\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228a60bab943954d419471056b5b100ba1\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL (M\u0101ori Party\u2014Waiariki):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Speaker, kia ora t\u0101tou katoa. Ko t\u0101ku noa ake, ko te whaiwhai haere i ng\u0101 kaik\u014Drero i te ahiahi nei m\u014D te aitu\u0101 i t\u0101w\u0101hi, i Hapanihi, ka mutu, ka whai i t\u0113r\u0101 parekura nui i \u014Ctautahi, ka mutu, i Ahitereiria, n\u014D reira koi nei te tangi o te ng\u0101kau m\u014D te hunga kua ngaro atu i te tirohanga kanohi. Te \u0101hua nei, koi nei w\u0101 t\u0101tou mahi i te r\u014Danga o t\u0113nei tau, he tangi ki w\u0101 t\u0101tou mate. N\u014D reira, waiho r\u0101tou kia moe, kia okioki. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000248\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EI nanahi nei, hai te r\u0101 nei, \u0101p\u014Dp\u014D pea ko te take nui e k\u014Drerohia ana i roto i te Whare P\u0101remata, ko te pire takutai moana h\u014Du, an\u0101, ko t\u0113r\u0101 kua whakairia e te R\u014Dp\u016B N\u0101hinara me te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori ki mua i te aroaro o te motu. Kua t\u016B ake ki te whakautu, ki te whakah\u0113 r\u0101nei i \u0113tahi o ng\u0101 k\u014Drero i k\u014Drerohia inap\u014D, n\u0101 runga i te h\u0113 r\u0101nei o \u0113tahi o ng\u0101 k\u014Drero i puta; me te k\u014Dre m\u0101rama r\u0101nei o ng\u0101 k\u014Drero. Ko t\u0101 te r\u014Dp\u016B e noho atu nei, te R\u014Dp\u016B ACT, e ai ki t\u0101na, t\u0113tahi o ng\u0101 kaik\u014Drero i reira, he tere rawa te akiakinga o t\u0113nei pire i te Whare, ka mutu, e ai ki t\u0101 r\u0101tou, kua katia t\u0113nei te k\u014Drero i roto i te Whare P\u0101remata. Kai te kaha whakah\u0113 au i t\u0113r\u0101 k\u014Drero. Kua whitu tau t\u0113nei pire e k\u014Drerohia ana, me k\u012B, i hangaia kia eke ki t\u0113nei o ng\u0101 taumata. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000249\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[Thank you, Mr Speaker, and greetings to us all. I join the speakers this afternoon to express my condolences in respect of the calamity overseas in Japan, following that huge disaster in Christchurch, and the one before that, in Australia. So the heart grieves here for those who cannot be seen again. It seems that this is all we are doing as this year unfolds, mourning our deaths. So leave them there to sleep and to rest. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000250\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EThe most important thing that was debated yesterday in the House, and is to continue today and tomorrow, perhaps, is the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill that National and the M\u0101ori Party have put before the nation. I rise to respond to or to rescind some of the comments that were made last night, because some were either made incorrectly or lacked clarity. According to one of the speakers of the ACT Party seated just along the way, this bill was rushed through the House. I strongly reject that assertion. This bill has been debated and in the making for 7 years to be where it is now.]\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000251\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fc213e902550459cab0030fd0f00700a\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. It is my understanding that this bill is the next order of business. I think this must be the classic case of anticipating a debate.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000252\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022af789b1e1f1b4495ada171fd95f9c515\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: It is not fair to interrupt another member\u2019s speech. The member knows that this is the general debate and members are at liberty to talk about almost anything they wish to. He is not anticipating a debate; he is choosing to speak in the general debate on a bill that is currently before the House. I am not aware that there is any Standing Order that forbids during the general debate any comments on other matters before the House. I stand corrected if I am wrong, but it is not my understanding\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000253\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227a35823413ab445c8bc776e30b6c1fd0\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I think you might be giving a correction soon.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000254\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022dde4f6b9697a45f2b15b1ca923ba94a1\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Well, we will see. In the meantime I will allow Te Ururoa Flavell to continue. If I am incorrect\u2014and I will seek advice\u2014I will apologise to the member.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000255\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d65e9497362847f5a16f2f10c199afe1\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL\u003C/span\u003E: T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Speaker; whakahokia ng\u0101 meneti nei, whakahokia ki te t\u012Bmatanga. Hoi an\u014D, kai te pai, kai te pai. Ka mutu, kia hoki r\u0101 an\u014D ki taku k\u014Drero\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000256\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[Thank you, Mr Speaker, rewind those minutes\u2014take it back to the beginning. Never mind, it is fine, it is OK. Now let me go all the way back once again to my speech\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000257\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002263f547250eda43349cec5762abc1a56a\u0022\u003EHon Darren Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: Kao, kao.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000258\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022db249b30a2d84b53b3732568518e4b6e\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL\u003C/span\u003E: Kei te pai.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000259\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002274423f6d7ccf4e7588d2d65eb7dc0703\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. As long as the debate is extended we have no problem with it. I apologise to the member.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000260\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022dcfefb8849cc488b9ae621eae2612a47\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I appreciate the member\u2019s attempt to assist, but the member who is speaking has 3 minutes and 14 seconds remaining. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000261\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cac0ac7e37d14b1593ff6b5b2a89ef36\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL\u003C/span\u003E: Kia ora, Mr Speaker. P\u0113nei t\u0101ku e k\u014Drero nei, kua roa t\u0113nei take e k\u014Drerohia ana. E 5,975 ng\u0101 whakatakotoranga \u0101-tuhi i tae mai ki te Whare P\u0101remata. I haere te komiti ki te mata o te whenua, ki Kirikiriroa, ki T\u0101maki-makau-rau, ki Wh\u0101ngarei, ki P\u014Dneke nei, ki \u014Ctautahi tonu. E ai ki t\u0101 Te Reo Motuhake o Te Tai Tokerau, 72 noa iho o taua kaute n\u014D te Ao M\u0101ori, kotahi pai h\u0113neti o ng\u0101 whakatakotoranga \u0101-tuhi n\u014D te Ao M\u0101ori engari me p\u0113nei rawa te whakam\u0101rama ake. E kaha ana te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori ki te haere ki te mata o te whenua, kia toro atu te ringa ki te mata o te whenua, ki t\u0113n\u0101 h\u0101pori, i tae atu ki ng\u0101 huinga o te K\u0101hui Rangatira o te Motu, ka mutu, ko tae atu ki ng\u0101 hui e hia k\u0113 nei. N\u014D reira, koia t\u0113r\u0101, ehara i te mea n\u014D naia tonu nei t\u0113nei take i puta mai i te k\u0101pata, k\u0101o. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000262\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EKa mutu, he aha ng\u0101 tino painga o roto i te pire? Kai te k\u014Drerohia \u0101 te ahiahi nei pea, \u0101p\u014Dp\u014D engari, ko t\u0113tahi mea kua puta, ar\u0101, ko t\u0113nei, kua whai t\u0113nei te tikanga i roto i ng\u0101 take \u0101-ture. He mea nui t\u0113r\u0101 ki a ng\u0101i M\u0101ori tonu. Ka mutu, kua whai w\u0101hi an\u014D r\u0101 te kupu wh\u0101nau i roto i ng\u0101 whiriwhiringa m\u014D te pire, an\u0101, kua whakaw\u0101teahia mai t\u0113nei whakam\u0101rama m\u014D te wh\u0101nau, m\u014D te iwi, m\u014D te hap\u016B i roto i te pire. Ko t\u0113nei mea m\u014D te manaakitanga, he take nui i roto i te Ao M\u0101ori. Kua eke t\u0113nei mea te manaakitanga ki roto i t\u0113nei o ng\u0101 pire. \u0100e, e tika ana. \u0112hara i te mea i eke \u014D m\u0101tou wawata ki ng\u0101 taumata e tika ana. I kaha tohe m\u0101tou kia whakahokia ng\u0101 take nei ki roto i te K\u014Dti Whenua M\u0101ori, m\u0101na tonu ng\u0101 take whakatau, ka mutu, e ai ki t\u0101 m\u0101tou kai reira ng\u0101 m\u0101tauranga hai wetewete i te h\u014Dhonutanga o ng\u0101 take \u0101-takutai moana \u0113ngari, me te mea an\u014D hoki he m\u0101m\u0101 noa iho te utu. He ng\u0101wari ake te utu o te K\u014Dti Whenua M\u0101ori, hoi an\u014D, tua atu o t\u0113r\u0101 k\u0101re m\u0101tou i tino toa i roto i t\u0113r\u0101 whiriwhiringa \u0113ngari, kua whakaaetia mai e te K\u0101wanatanga, kua whakatahangia he p\u016Btea hai \u0101whina i te hunga e hiahia ana ki te whakatakoto i t\u0113tahi ker\u0113me ki mua i te aroaro o ng\u0101 k\u014Dti. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000263\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EHe nui ng\u0101 k\u014Drero m\u014D t\u0113nei mea te muru whenua. Ko t\u0101 m\u0101tou ko te k\u012B atu, ka tino k\u014Dkirihia t\u0113nei take i t\u0113nei pire, kia whakahokia te whenua M\u0101ori ki roto i ng\u0101 ringaringa o te iwi M\u0101ori. E k\u012B ana \u0113tahi, ko te \u201Clegalised confiscation\u201D t\u0113tahi take e k\u014Drerohia. \u0100e, ko t\u0101 m\u0101tou k\u012B, me \u0101ta titiro ki t\u0113r\u0101 take. Ko t\u0101 m\u0101tou, ko te k\u012B atu m\u0113n\u0101 i murua te whenua i ng\u0101 tau kua hipa, ahakoa \u0101-ture, \u0101-public works, he aha r\u0101nei, e kore t\u0113r\u0101 e aukati i ng\u0101 huarahi katoa, kia hoki ng\u0101 iwi ki te k\u014Dti. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000264\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EKa mutu, me mihi ki a Te Aitanga-a-Hauiti, kua tae mai t\u0113tahi k\u014Drero ki te k\u012B, me anga whakamua, kaua e tatari. Kia ora t\u0101tou. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000265\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[Thank you, Mr Speaker. As I alluded to before, this matter has been talked about for a long time. Five thousand nine hundred and seventy-five written submissions arrived at Parliament. The select committee travelled to Hamilton, Auckland, Wh\u0101ngarei, Wellington, and Christchurch. The independent voice of Te Tai Tokerau has suggested that only 72 of that number were from the M\u0101ori people\u2014just over 1 percent of the written submissions received; but let me explain it this way. The M\u0101ori Party, went hard out to visit the country, to extend the hand to that community and that, attended Iwi Leaders Forum conferences, and many, many meetings about the matter. So it is not as if this has just emerged from the cupboard\u2014not at all. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000266\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EWhat benefits are there in this bill? Perhaps these will be mentioned this afternoon or tomorrow, but one benefit is that M\u0101ori customary values and practices will permeate legislation\u2014a matter of huge importance to all of M\u0101oridom. The term \u201Cwh\u0101nau\u201D is incorporated throughout the bill, as are \u201Chap\u016B\u201D and \u201Ciwi\u201D. \u201CManaakitanga\u201D is an important concept in M\u0101oridom. It has been introduced in this bill, and rightly so. However, we were not successful in everything we advocated for. We argued strongly for cases relating to the foreshore to be taken to the M\u0101ori Land Court, arguing that the expertise to untangle complex and far-reaching issues is there. Moreover, the expenses involved in pursuing a claim at the M\u0101ori Land Court are considerably less. We did not win that one, but we did achieve confirmation that the Crown will provide funding for claimants. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000267\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EThere is much rhetoric about confiscation. We say that this bill advocates the return of M\u0101ori land to their people. Some say the issue in question here is \u201Clegalised confiscation\u201D. Yes, we say that the issue must be addressed. To us, if land was confiscated years ago under legislation, be it for public works, or whatever, that should not impede tribes from going back to the courts.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000268\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E Finally, I must acknowledge a message from Te Aitanga-a-Hauiti, which has just come to hand, saying: \u201CGo forward\u2014do not wait.\u201D Greetings to us.]\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00224567670269f14abf8889e3d8861a81e8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000269\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224567670269f14abf8889e3d8861a81e8\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Yes, it relates to the point of order I had previously; notwithstanding the fact that I had worked it out about a minute later, I thought it was probably appropriate and polite to let the member who was speaking finish. But I submit to you, Mr Speaker, that Standing Order 109 is absolutely clear, and if that is not clear enough, then pages 185 and 186 of McGee make it very clear, that unless you are of the judgment that a matter will not be got to, then it cannot be anticipated in earlier debate. I know that I have been told off by previous Speakers for anticipating debate during a general debate. Although we know that a general debate is wide-ranging, the fact that it is wide-ranging cannot overrule the Standing Orders, which make it clear that a member may not anticipate discussion of any general business\u2014or, in this case, an order of the day. The bill is Government order of the day No. 1, and, unless you know something that I do not know, Mr Speaker, I am anticipating that we will get to that within the next hour.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000270\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002232297c9f07a5416abcde39f14ea56434\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: Speaking to the point of order\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000271\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002214ff7e46ba46442ab28641d9544539e7\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I do not think I need further assistance on the matter; I thank the honourable member. I accept the points the Hon Trevor Mallard is making\u2014that specific debate around a matter on the Order Paper that is to come before the House later on should not be allowed. Indeed, Standing Order 109 precludes that. But I ask the member to reflect back on what Te Ururoa Flavell actually said. He said that matters were raised in the debate yesterday, and that he wished to comment on the issues that were talked about yesterday during debate in this House. That cannot be anticipating debate for today, because he was specifically referring to issues raised yesterday. Had he specifically said that he wanted to talk about\u2014if I recollect correctly, the Committee was on Part 1\u2014issues in \u201CPart whatever\u201D, which was still to come up in front of the Committee of the whole House, then I think the member\u2019s point of order would have been valid. So there is nothing wrong with his point of order, at all; it is just that it is my assessment that the member was talking about issues that had been raised in debate yesterday. That cannot be anticipating debate, especially when the particular legislation the Committee is focused on is a part by part debate in the Committee of the whole House, and the member did not say that he wanted to talk about parts that are still to come up in the debate. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022150a1d3cb7b24e35baa172c0921d3262\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000272\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022150a1d3cb7b24e35baa172c0921d3262\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Again, this is without rancour and it is a \u201Clet us get the rules established\u201D type of point of order. Still to come in the debate, obviously, is everything of substance other than Part 1, and we also have, from my understanding, a title clause and a commencement clause. I was listening to the member, and relying on the translation, but I could not identify anything he referred to that could not have been part of the bill. I accept that he was responding initially to the comments that Hone Harawira made yesterday, but the points of substance he was making actually referred to details in the bill, and the focus of the bill, to which we have not yet got. I think this ruling is, effectively, a rule change. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000273\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221f3f1928715341838904c6bfc0bc45fa\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I realise that the member wants to clarify the Standing Order in this area, but I invite him to reflect on the whole development of the general debate, and of the origins of this Standing Order. He, being a longstanding member, will reflect that the general debate is a relatively recent innovation, and I think that around the general debate there is a lot of laxity, if you like, in terms of what members can address. But I think that the member speaking, when he got to his feet, said specifically that he wanted to cover issues, address issues, that had been raised in the debate yesterday, and as Speaker I cannot determine which part of the legislation he is referring to. Some of these issues, if they were covered yesterday, one presumes may be related to the preamble and to Part 1 of that relevant legislation. Certainly, nothing in Standing Order 109 prevents a member during this general debate from going over material that was covered yesterday. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000274\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EAll I ask members is just to be mindful of the points that the Hon Trevor Mallard has made\u2014that our Standing Orders do, as a matter of principle, preclude anticipating debate. Therefore, were the member to have been focused particularly on issues still to come up in the Committee of the whole House, then I would have had a serious concern about the matter. So I accept that the member\u2019s point of order is well made and well founded, but I think that under these particular circumstances it would have been unreasonable of me to rule Te Ururoa Flavell\u2019s speech out of order when, in his opinion, he was specifically referring to issues that had been covered yesterday, and therefore was not anticipating. Although I accept what the member is saying\u2014that some of these issues may yet again come before the House during the third reading, and the title and commencement debates, etc.\u2014I think it would be unreasonable for me to be too pedantic in that area. I think the general principle is important, but I think that the member was reasonable in referring to issues covered yesterday. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022b2f0dee764ad4e41811c62667936b6b4\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000275\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b2f0dee764ad4e41811c62667936b6b4\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Just one further point. I think you referred to the general debate as a relatively recent innovation. I think I can remember it being here since 1986. It might, in the time of Parliament, be something that is relatively recent, but I think that in our experience it is probably not, really.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000276\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022820bf8ec8cf24d75a0a8ea51bd3f92b8\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I have just been told by the Clerk of the House that it was 1984\u2014forgive me; I obviously would rather think it was\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000277\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022332cd643c1b04d379f71dd53ad788d5a\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: Oh, so Parliament has been around for a long time, so it is \u201Crelatively recently\u201D. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000278\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222100304990ce49acaaac8a5678745dd0\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I accept the honourable member\u2019s correction there, and I stand corrected.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022 data-id=\u0022396276ca41d44366a68c379cc793d0a4\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000279\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022396276ca41d44366a68c379cc793d0a4\u0022\u003EJACQUI DEAN (National\u2014Waitaki):\u003C/span\u003E I want to begin by extending my thoughts and best wishes to the people of Japan who are enduring the worst calamity possible, with the major earthquake followed by a tsunami, and now a developing nuclear crisis.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000280\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003EIn our own country, the aftershock in Christchurch on 22 February brought fresh sadness to the people of Canterbury. We got away with only property damage in the September earthquake, but the February earthquake was indeed a tragedy for the families and friends of those people who died in New Zealand and throughout the world, including some folk from Japan. Also, there was a sadness for all of the rest of us throughout New Zealand and further afield.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000281\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003EI want to pay tribute today to the Prime Minister, John Key, and his Ministers for their swift, decisive, effective, thoughtful, and compassionate response to this tragedy of ours. The job now is rebuilding Christchurch. Mayor Bob Parker and the Minister of Civil Defence, John Carter, have been absolutely tireless in their efforts to restore essential services to the people of Christchurch, because once we begin to deal with the shock, the grief, and the horror of what has happened to people, we then have to get down to the more mundane aspects of this tragedy and start thinking about, and acting on, the challenges of the practicalities of providing essential services.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000282\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003EA massive recovery operation is required, and the declaration of the extension of the state of national emergency ensures that the maximum possible coordination and cooperation between central and local government and between central and local resources will be most effective in response to this disaster. Essential infrastructure throughout Christchurch was absolutely devastated. Power services, reticulated water, and sanitation ceased for many, many people in Christchurch.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000283\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003ELife changed immediately for the people of Christchurch, who, as well as being traumatised and fearful of what happened and of the aftershocks still to come, were also coping, maybe for the first time in their lives, with having to deal with the very practical business of going about living, drinking, eating, going to work, and using essential services. So it is encouraging, and it is to the credit of all those involved, including those I have named, that the services are well on the way to being restored. The job is not done, obviously, and a lot of work still needs to be done in the short, medium, and long term, but there is a plan and many, many gains have been made.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000284\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003EPower has been restored to nearly 100 percent of customers, and that has been done by the power companies working tirelessly 24 hours a day, day and night, on restoring that essential service to customers.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000285\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003EInside the central business district, the area that has been absolutely devastated, 50 percent of central business district customers have been reconnected. As we know, those services are fragile and fluctuating, and the system is still not secure. However, it has certainly made many gains. Approximately 95 percent of households on a mains water supply have now been reconnected, and I know that the lack of reticulated water\u2014water still has to be boiled\u2014has been of particular concern to people. They cannot cook, they cannot bathe, and they cannot wash their hands without water. I know that the connection of that service was the highest priority, and 95 percent of that has been achieved.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022 data-id=\u0022905d2508168947c4942ea6c115a37b02\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000286\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022905d2508168947c4942ea6c115a37b02\u0022\u003EKEITH LOCKE (Green):\u003C/span\u003E It is heartbreaking to see people in north-east Japan, who are reeling from the devastation of the earthquake and the tsunami, now living in fear of nuclear radiation. Japan, the only country to be attacked with nuclear bombs, with a huge loss of life, is now in the midst of another nuclear disaster. It puts in question the whole future of the nuclear industry. It may be the death knell of nuclear power not only in Japan but worldwide. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000287\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EFor the Greens this latest, tragic accident reinforces what we have long said: nuclear power is inherently dangerous. Nuclear technology is outside the limits of human safeguards. In a nuclear power plant there can be no guarantee that radiation will not be released as a result of a natural disaster or through human error. The danger of radiation release or a meltdown can be minimised, but it cannot be eliminated. When an accident occurs the consequences can be monumental. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000288\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EThere have been a series of nuclear accidents, leakages, and near misses in several countries since the big accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. In 1999 in Japan, two workers at the Tokaimura plant died from high radiation doses when a nuclear chain reaction began after safety regulations were violated. In 2004 five workers were killed in a steam explosion at Japan\u2019s Mihama reactor. There has long been controversy over nuclear safety issues at Britain\u2019s Sellafield nuclear plant. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000289\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003ESafety problems exist not only in nuclear power plants but also in the transport and storage of nuclear waste, which amounts to about a quarter of a million tonnes a year. There is simply no way to store such waste safely so that it will not affect future generations as it leaches into waterways, the sea, or the atmosphere as a result of earth movement or earthquakes. There is no guarantee that future generations will even know where the waste is stored. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000290\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EThen we have the danger of the products of the nuclear industry, enriched uranium and plutonium, being used to make nuclear weapons, or the radioactive material itself being used to make what are known as \u201Cdirty bombs\u201D. The end of the nuclear power industry would enhance the possibilities for nuclear disarmament. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000291\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EIn some countries politicians argue that they need nuclear power plants to produce enough electricity. However, the truth is that nuclear power is an expensive and short-term alternative to renewable sources of energy. There is nowhere in the world where nuclear power plants are not subsidised by Governments, collectively, to the tune of billions of dollars. Nuclear power is a short-term energy solution. As the International Energy Agency said in 2008, if all the planned new reactors come on stream, the known reserves of uranium, 5.5 million tonnes, will be gone by 2050\u2014in less than 40 years. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000292\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EInstead of subsidising nuclear power plants, Governments should be investing in research on renewables and allowing for subsidies for renewable energy, as well as encouraging energy saving. That would be cost-effective, sustainable, and safe for people and the environment. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EThe latest nuclear disaster in Japan makes me so glad that our country is nuclear-free, and I pay tribute to the many thousands of New Zealanders whose active campaigning from 1960 to 1985 made us so. I pay particular tribute to the Campaign Half Million petitioners in the 1970s, who knocked on the head plans to have a nuclear power plant in New Zealand. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000294\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EHowever, we should not sit back. Our Government should be taking our nuclear-free message to the world, campaigning at the UN and elsewhere for a phase-out of nuclear power plants and for the promotion of renewable forms of energy. We should join hands with the antinuclear campaigners in Japan, who are using this opportunity not only to help those who are currently in danger and potentially dying but also to push for a transition away from nuclear power. The Greens Japan have inspired an Asia-Pacific Green Network statement calling for all countries in our region to \u201Csuspend all operations, constructions and plans for nuclear plants\u201D pending a regional hearing on the safety, social, environmental, and economic issues involved. We owe it to those now suffering from nuclear radiation in Japan to take such protective steps.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022749d97b8-a772-4227-83da-b5e264c37bc0\u0022 data-id=\u0022a88fa27b11d040879901e3ce1fb71e57\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000295\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022749d97b8-a772-4227-83da-b5e264c37bc0\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a88fa27b11d040879901e3ce1fb71e57\u0022\u003EALLAN PEACHEY (National\u2014T\u0101maki):\u003C/span\u003E When New Zealanders have the chance to look back and reflect on the misfortune that struck Christchurch last month and think about the immediate event, the rescue efforts, the recovery efforts, and now the beginning of the reconstruction, they will take a lot of confidence and a lot of satisfaction from the way that their Government has responded\u2014by that I mean government in the broadest possible sense. Obviously it has not been perfect in every instance; in a situation like that it never can be. But I think everybody will agree that it has been pretty jolly good and that large numbers of New Zealanders have got in behind the effort, broken their backs, and done everything they possibly can. That will continue. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000296\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022749d97b8-a772-4227-83da-b5e264c37bc0\u0022\u003EI want to devote the time I have in my short speech to talk about the education system in Christchurch, its response, and the challenges that lie before it. Right across the broad aspect of life people are having to adapt, and it is no different for the children who go to school, their parents, and their teachers. But the way that everybody has moved to get the schooling system, the education system generally, back in operation has been impressive. I understand that by the end of this week 143 Christchurch schools will have been reopened, which is 88 percent of schools, and 234 early childhood education centres will have reopened, which is 69 percent of all centres. Canterbury University is getting up and running. Imaginative exchange programmes have been put in place for students to study at five other New Zealand universities, and some students have had the opportunity to go to Adelaide. Christchurch Polytechnic is getting under way, as is Lincoln University, and a large number of the private training establishments. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000297\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022749d97b8-a772-4227-83da-b5e264c37bc0\u0022\u003EChristchurch City, in an education and schooling sense, is getting under way and gradually getting back to normal. It will not be easy. One of the most impressive things happening is the sharing of school resources. That is going to be an interesting innovation. It may turn out to be quite an educational experiment from which we will learn a lot, and it may have potential for other areas in New Zealand. I certainly will be watching the outcome of that sharing very, very closely. There is the Papanui High School/Shirley Boys High School arrangement: Papanui High School operates in the morning; Shirley Boys High School operates in the afternoon. Shirley Boys High School, of course, was one of the most seriously damaged schools in the city and is a school that has a great record of service, and of educating boys in that particular part of the town. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000298\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022749d97b8-a772-4227-83da-b5e264c37bc0\u0022\u003EI noted with interest a comment in the media this morning by the principal of Shirley Boys High School in which he said it would be unrealistic to expect most pupils would catch up on everything they had missed. I am not sure about that, but I am confident every effort will be made to ensure the students in Christchurch schools who have lost education will be able to catch up. I am quite excited to hear some of the suggestions made about the possibilities of extra tutorials, school during the holidays, Saturday classes, and bringing in volunteers and retired teachers to help. I have every confidence that where schools decide to go the extra mile for their youngsters, whether it be Saturday classes, evening classes, or holiday classes, teachers will step up and do the job, because that is what schoolteachers do. As a former school principal and teacher myself I encourage Canterbury teachers to do that. Teachers belong to a profession with a long history of service, and when needed\u2014and Mr Davis opposite will concur, I think, with what I am saying\u2014and when called upon they will step up. In anticipation of that, I thank them for their effort.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022 data-id=\u00222e1db1172af54fc39310aaed2cc26716\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000299\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222e1db1172af54fc39310aaed2cc26716\u0022\u003EDARIEN FENTON (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I join with the House in expressing my sadness and condolences for the people of Japan, who have faced a horrific earthquake, an unbelievable tsunami, and now a nuclear threat the likes of which we have not seen since 1986 with Chernobyl. It is just unbelievable horror. All we can do is try to pass on our support to the Japanese people, send whatever help we can, fundraise for those people, and give the Japanese families in New Zealand whatever support we can provide. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000300\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003EOf course, we have our own ongoing disaster to contend with in Christchurch. I acknowledge that life has not returned to normal for most people, and that there is a way to go. As we said in the House last week when we were debating the Canterbury Earthquake Commemoration Day Bill, which gives a day off on Friday, Labour will stand with the Government and the people of Christchurch to help them get through this. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000301\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003EI note also that yesterday 220 workers lost their jobs at Canterbury Spinners. Sadly, that is in addition to some job losses that have happened already. There will be more. There is a call out today for the Government to provide a clearer direction about what support redundant workers are entitled to, and I ask the Minister of Labour to look at that\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000302\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022658b7e8946384d7a9fccd0f88099a795\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: They\u2019re employed by an international firm.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000303\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fa095cfa935449feb9158db31bddd3fc\u0022\u003EDARIEN FENTON\u003C/span\u003E: They are employed by a national firm that is still operating so there is some lack of clarity about\u2014[Interruption] They are Australian owned\u2014is that right? There is definitely a lack of clarity, and the workers are very concerned about signing up for individual entitlement because they may have to pay it back if it is incorrectly allocated to them. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000304\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003EToday I will talk about another group of people who are not doing so well in our country. Although it is important that we give our attention to Christchurch, a large group of people in our country rely on the State to set their wages: workers on the minimum wage. They are the poorest paid workers in the country and they are struggling because the Government has put the interests of big business ahead of those people and their families. In a couple of weeks\u2019 time, on 1 April, their pay will go up by 25c an hour. The Minister was told by her own department that a 25c an hour increase was not an increase in real terms. Under her miserly 25c an hour, 53,000 workers will get an increase of\u2014actually\u2014nothing. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000305\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003EWe want to see the minimum wage increase to $15 an hour at the earliest opportunity. If that had been the increase this year, half a billion dollars could have been put into the economy this year. That has to be good for everyone. However, we do not have high expectations for this Government, because when it comes to minimum wage workers it is so out of touch with ordinary Kiwi families who are struggling to make ends meet. I do not think it knows how to consider their needs.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000306\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a9efc03f9d99422d9a4b12ec3b911137\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: Are you going to pay for it? Who\u2019s going to pay for it? Shane Jones? I don\u2019t think so.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000307\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022445bfed73a3f4159b955a0d26f75239e\u0022\u003EDARIEN FENTON\u003C/span\u003E: There was an alternative that goes past the arguments that the Hon Tau Henare is yelling out across the House. The Minister could have opted for another 50c an hour, taking the minimum wage to $13.50 an hour. Her own department\u2019s advice was that this increase would put $76 million in the pockets of 108,000 workers and would have had negligible impact on total employment. Her own department\u2019s advice showed that increasing the minimum wage to $13.50 an hour would have a negligible impact on employment; in fact, no jobs would be lost and there would be a marginal reduction in the number of newly available positions in the labour market. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000308\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a40f5af7-f9b0-4b44-9669-9e63be1c3ced\u0022\u003EThat $76 million would have been pumped into the economy, because we all know that minimum wage workers and low-paid workers spend whatever they earn. That $76 million would have helped them cope with rising petrol costs and increases in rent and food prices. They would have had that money to take their kids to the general practitioner. That little bit of extra money might have helped them deal with the increasing costs in early childhood education. Maybe it would have been enough to cover the increases in car registration this year, help pay the power bill, or perhaps help pay the phone bill next month rather than just be cut off. These families would have had a little bit extra to cope with, but the truth is that the increase to the weekly minimum wage will not pay for even a block of cheese or a litre of milk.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022 data-id=\u0022c795e608c73c4d0b8915ec1b40a49427\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000309\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c795e608c73c4d0b8915ec1b40a49427\u0022\u003ELOUISE UPSTON (National\u2014Taup\u014D):\u003C/span\u003E On Friday night I was listening to the news as I drove home, and I heard the devastation in Japan unfolding. I must say that when I went to bed it was with dread, as I wondered what on earth we would wake up to. The magnitude 9 earthquake off north-eastern Japan and the resulting tsunami, and now the nuclear threat, have caused widespread devastation, with thousands of Japanese having lost their lives and many more thousands missing. Three Fridays ago I was in Auckland and met with some of the Japanese urban search and rescue team who had come to assist us in Christchurch. So it is hard to believe that by this Friday it will be our New Zealand urban search and rescue team that will be assisting Japan, and returning their favour. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000310\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003EBut I want to focus just on Christchurch. It is fair to say that this crisis has united the nation. Rebuilding Christchurch will clearly be this Government\u2019s main focus this year, which it quite rightly should be. I am particularly proud of the leadership that John Key, our Prime Minister, has demonstrated in supporting those who are in such desperate need. It will be a long and complex task. It will not be a simple process. It will be about rebuilding Christchurch, literally brick by brick. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000311\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003EThis is a Government that has responded very rapidly and very fully to the needs of those in Christchurch, so I am somewhat staggered that an Opposition speaker took this opportunity to talk about the minimum wage when there are people in Christchurch who are desperate for housing and for social infrastructure. Those members are talking about $76 million. Where do they think it will come from? Does it grow on trees in their world? Well, in Christchurch we are more interested in rebuilding and getting people\u2019s lives back to basics. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000312\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003ELet us look at this Government, which is clearly in touch with what the people in Christchurch need, and at the wraparound social assistance package we have provided. It has provided for both employees and employers\u2014both sides of the puzzle. The Christchurch Earthquake Employment Support Package has paid out more than $72 million to businesses, sole traders, and employees. Earthquake support subsidy payments have been made to nearly 8,000 employers, covering over 41,000 staff and over 9,000 sole traders. Job loss cover has been provided to 4,900 individuals. Then there is the $12 million that has been distributed through civil defence emergency payments to cover things like food, clothing, and housing. We have eight recovery assistance centres open, and some of them are in the very hardest-hit suburbs. These centres provide a one-stop shop where people can sort out all sorts of emergency payments, issues with housing, get counselling, or simply stop for a chat. There are also six mobile Work and Income vans supporting individuals who are in need in Christchurch. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000313\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003EIf we look at businesses, we are pleased to see that some of them have already opted out of the Government\u2019s earthquake support package. They received the desperate support they needed for a short time, and now that they are back on their feet they are able to continue. We have provided employers with much-needed certainty during this very uncertain time by supporting them in paying their employees\u2019 wages. There will be further support, which will be announced shortly. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000314\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003EIt is fair to say that the Christchurch earthquake was this country\u2019s darkest day, but it was followed by some of our very finest moments. Every day heroes emerged, whether they were the Student Volunteer Army, the Farmy Army, or people in our electorates up and down New Zealand. It will, of course, be a sombre day on Friday when the national memorial service is held in Christchurch, but it will give the country an opportunity to mourn the great loss of life. In the words of Mahatma Gandhi: \u201CStrength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indomitable will.\u201D We have seen this indomitable will in Christchurch and in Japan.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022 data-id=\u00225991f714220445b1826edb9049983229\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000315\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225991f714220445b1826edb9049983229\u0022\u003ECAROL BEAUMONT (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E Like other members in this House my heart goes out to the people of Japan and also to our own people in Canterbury. I think that everybody in this House has done their bit to try to assist them, and I particularly acknowledge the Christchurch MPs from all parties, who have been working so hard. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000316\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003EI do, however, find it somewhat distasteful that the last speaker thinks it is not OK for members of this House to comment on other important social matters that affect our country. We cannot have that. We are a House of Representatives. It does not mean that we do not care about those issues if we raise other issues of concern. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000317\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003EI add my voice and say that I believe we are going backwards. New Zealand is becoming a more unfair society. Inequality is growing. It is becoming a worse place to bring up our children. That is not the New Zealand I want, and I do not think it is the New Zealand that most New Zealanders want. The Government is out of touch with the reality facing most New Zealanders, particularly low and middle income New Zealanders. That reality sees New Zealanders facing petrol price rises and rental increases. Especially in Auckland, where I work, the rental increases are just phenomenal. They are also facing power price increases, increases in early childhood education fees, significant increases in the cost of food, increases in ACC levies\u2014the list goes on and on. People are facing ever-rising costs, and it is hurting them; it is hurting them very badly. I think members opposite are completely out of touch with that. They obviously are not talking to low and middle income New Zealanders who really are struggling. We can see it in people\u2019s faces when they talk to us about what the latest petrol price rise means for them, for example. The reality of the increasing cost of living is very serious. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000318\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003EWhen we look at the other side of the ledger, the income side, we see that prices are rising far faster than wages. Real wages went backwards by 3.4 percent in the year to June 2010, and 100,000 more people are now living on benefits, which was not made as a lifestyle choice. The 25c per hour increase in the minimum wage is pathetic and insulting, as my colleague Darien Fenton said. It will just not cut it for people who are reliant on the minimum wage. That is $10 gross per week for a worker who works 40 hours a week, in terms of extra income. That is not enough to buy an extra litre of milk per day or a block of cheese per week for their families. For those who are interested, the article by Michael Parker in today\u2019s New Zealand Herald headlined \u201CStop kowtowing to unfair prices\u201D, on the issue of milk prices, is very interesting. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000319\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003EBut the issue is about more than figures; it is about people who are struggling. What we have seen in this country is more money for a very few people, and a lot less money for many others. That puts pressure on families, on women who are trying to balance the family budget, and on children who are living in poverty in this country. For those members who have not bothered to read the Salvation Army report Stalled, one in five children in New Zealand is living in poverty. That is not the country I want to live in. Schools are having to provide lunches and they are having to provide breakfasts. More and more families, low and middle income families, have to seek food parcels. People do so with a sense of shame. They do not do it as a lifestyle choice, like the Prime Minister suggested. By November 2010 the Salvation Army had encountered 19,000 new households seeking help. In the Maungakiekie electorate that I work in, my electorate office has seen an increasing number of cases where the cost of living is severely impacting on families, and that is having a negative effect on children. This is an issue for the present and for the future. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000320\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003EThe significant issues are, firstly, the price of housing, and, secondly, the constantly escalating food prices. I refer to the mother of three who lost her job and received no redundancy, but she had a medium level of debt. She was reduced to seeking handouts of food in order to get by. She fed her children before she had anything to eat. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022 data-id=\u002207a6f95796114650ab875fd4fd46b6f3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000321\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002207a6f95796114650ab875fd4fd46b6f3\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Before I call the next honourable member, I take this opportunity to remind all members in the House that members can use certain descriptors, but they cannot claim to be an electorate member when they are a list member. I alert members to that. It is becoming an increasing problem that I am having to deal with, and I will have to deal with it. Members cannot refer to themselves as being a member for an electorate when they are not.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022 data-id=\u0022e3f09d98ae3f4e7a8d81b9a91e7a2e6b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000322\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e3f09d98ae3f4e7a8d81b9a91e7a2e6b\u0022\u003EMELISSA LEE (National):\u003C/span\u003E The first I heard about the Japanese earthquake was when I was sitting with a group of young professional Koreans at our monthly gathering in Auckland. As people do when we get together, we were talking about everyday life, and on that particular occasion we were discussing the experiences of some of the young people who had travelled to Christchurch and seen the devastation there.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000323\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003EIt was via the social network of Twitter that I heard there was an earthquake in Japan. I did not take much notice as I know that Japan has regular tremors. Then my son rang me to say that there was a disaster in Japan. He said he was recording it, and there was slight panic in his voice. I had no idea of the enormity of the disaster. When I got home I sat in front of the television, my eyes glued to the screen and mouth wide open in utter disbelief at the sheer force and speed of the magnitude 9 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that had struck Japan. The imagery of cars stuck on roofs and boats on top of houses and factories will remain with me for a long, long time. My heart goes out to the people of Japan. I take this opportunity to pay my respects to the people, the victims and the families, in Japanese: Konkai no oujishin ya outsunami de, kaimetsuteki na, higai ni awareta, nihon no, katagata ni, kokoro yori okuyami, o moushiagetai tou, omoimasu. Ka tangi ahau.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000324\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003EThe Japanese disaster does not in any way diminish the effects of our own earthquake in Christchurch. We have all been affected. Most of us have family or friends who have lost loved ones in Christchurch. I personally have friends on the missing list from the CTV site. I have a girlfriend who ran a Japanese restaurant in the middle of the Christchurch central business district who was trapped and had to be rescued. I also have friends whose house was, as they said, completely munted. It was days before we could get hold of them. It was frustrating not being able to call them. We did not know whether they were alive or dead, whether they were hurt. That kind of grief and that kind of anxiety we all have felt. It is a devastating time for all, but particularly for the people in Christchurch and the wider Canterbury area who have lived through the disaster and the rescue efforts, and now are living through the recovery, the clean-up, and the rebuild of the Garden City.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000325\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003EI was in Christchurch a week after the earthquake, as our senior whip was, cleaning up. I was very, very impressed that he had driven his ute down to Christchurch to put his muscles to work. I, too, headed out to lend a hand in New Brighton, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Christchurch Korean community, headed by the president of its society, Kevin Park, for their hard work. On the day I was in New Brighton at least 50 to 60 Korean young men and women had rolled up their sleeves to go and help in the areas most affected. Their own homes were cracked, were affected by the earthquake, yet they were out there cleaning up the silt. Korean churches were providing lunches for these volunteers. I found out today that, as Chris said, in the area where he was working other Korean young men and women were volunteering their time and their energy to help people. It did not matter whether they were Koreans; they were out there helping others.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000326\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003EOne of the things I will most remember about this earthquake is that on the day I was using my very limited muscle strength to shovel silt I was going to help a Korean father who had lost two children, a 24-year-old and a 21-year-old, who had been studying at the CTV building. As I was walking out to the car park I saw an elderly gentleman, probably in his 80s, who was devastated and frustrated that someone had driven past his house at more than 5 kilometres an hour. He had made up a sign saying 5 kilometres; it was the only thing he could control in his life. All I could do was ask \u201CCan I please give you a hug?\u201D, and he cried. I felt I had done something good.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000327\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003ETo all the workers who have done the job in Christchurch, I pay my respects. I thank the Prime Minister for the leadership that he has shown throughout this disaster, which has been one of the biggest this country has faced.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022 data-id=\u0022d3db9e1a27794aada4cdf56a9b05b976\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000328\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d3db9e1a27794aada4cdf56a9b05b976\u0022\u003ECAROL BEAUMONT (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I seek leave to make a personal explanation to correct my speech.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000329\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d8dd12d83b92442892e4d5155041fe3e\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought for the member to make a personal explanation. Is there any objection? There is no objection.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000330\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00223facbb72-b3b0-464b-b24d-e6de0616f323\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220e4e60b868644d1b9a652f8d6c2509ae\u0022\u003ECAROL BEAUMONT\u003C/span\u003E: I said in my speech that I work in the Maungakiekie electorate. I then went on to refer to an electorate office. I should have said my out-of-Parliament office.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000331\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022208fa5d761864525aa39a2d6dae4b703\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: With that personal explanation the matter must rest there.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000332\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EThe debate having concluded, the motion lapsed.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n    \u003C/div\u003E\n    \u003Cdiv class=\u0022HpsHansard\u0022\u003E\n      \u003Cp\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsProceedingHeading\u0022\u003EBills\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000333\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubjectHeading\u0022 id=\u0022ec6a1a42517a49e28ea0b888653b278f\u0022\u003EMarine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000334\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u0022a94224b74fff44bc8bb6401e5258a2c3\u0022\u003EIn Committee\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000335\u0022\u003EDebate resumed from 15 March.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000336\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u0022fe06fa4e9772469b9e890c5f69d4f051\u0022\u003EPart 2  Common marine and coastal area (continued)\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022dfa851f0-ef7b-4834-bc41-1b3b645a3495\u0022 data-id=\u002218bb3216b52248e4b2df4b2f7ce4e079\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000337\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022dfa851f0-ef7b-4834-bc41-1b3b645a3495\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002218bb3216b52248e4b2df4b2f7ce4e079\u0022\u003EDAVID SHEARER (Labour\u2014Mt Albert):\u003C/span\u003E When the House rose last night I was speaking on clause 11 and clause 14. Clause 11 is the definition of the common marine and coastal area itself. It refers to that as a no man\u2019s land, in effect, that belongs to nobody. Although it is largely managed and will be regulated by the Crown, it is a political twilight zone, the like of which we have never seen before. It is a political piece of legislation and is not in any way designed to make this, as Mr Key said, \u201Ca durable solution\u201D. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000338\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022dfa851f0-ef7b-4834-bc41-1b3b645a3495\u0022\u003EI then spoke on clause 14. Clause 14, as members will recall, repeals the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. I remind members of what was said about this Act by the regulatory impact statement of May 2010. It stated that \u201CIf it was not for the symbolic value of repeal and a desire to address the Crown ownership aspect of the Act, then amendment could be an appropriate solution \u2026\u201D. In other words, the extraordinary divisiveness this legislation has caused would have been unnecessary.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022 data-id=\u00225a3b102344ba42988d9919fa3bfe31c3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000339\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225a3b102344ba42988d9919fa3bfe31c3\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA (Independent\u2014Te Tai Tokerau):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chairman. Kia ora t\u0101tou katoa e te Whare. I think it is important for all M\u0101ori people who are listening to this debate all around the country and who are watching on Parliament TV to be very, very clear in their understanding of where the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill is at and what it will take for it to become legislation. We are currently going through the Committee of the whole House, which is one of the last chances to convince the M\u0101ori Party of the error of its ways. Then after that there will be the final reading, after which this bill will become law. I want all M\u0101ori to know this because the votes in this Committee of the whole House make it glaringly obvious that if the M\u0101ori Party were to withdraw its support for this bill during this stage it would die the death it deserves. This bill is no longer about National; it is about the M\u0101ori Party. If M\u0101oridom wants to see this bill end here, then I urge them to contact the M\u0101ori Party MPs by email or by comment to the website at www.maoriparty.com.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000340\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022275989a064e84f349340424a0ec7345d\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I think this member has one of the loudest voices in Parliament, excepting mine and Mr Quinn\u2019s. But I am having trouble hearing him because of the interjections from Mr Henare and Mr Quinn. It is not as if there is healthy interaction happening; they are just yelling right over the top of him. Can I ask that you take some care of that so we can hear him? This is quite important.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000341\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cb7c872a56124f1e919544582af80d61\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: Speaking to the point of order, Mr Chairperson. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000342\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223685fa1a7cfe4fea88f8b20a2407a9a9\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: No, there is no need for the member to speak. I will monitor the matter. Members who have been here through this debate will know that I have kept a fairly cautionary eye on interjections. They should be rare and reasonable.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000343\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002203a571c63e0b43b59ba98c5b1987d4b7\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I have listened carefully to the first minute of this member\u2019s speech. He is meant to be addressing Part 2. He has not mentioned Part 2 yet.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000344\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022be63b080a8834342863c196959bff1f5\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: That is not a point of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000345\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fe940dfe5af14eea869aa986f1d1dc4e\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA\u003C/span\u003E: This bill is about the M\u0101ori Party. If M\u0101oridom wants to see this bill end here during our discussion on Part 2, then I urge them to contact the M\u0101ori Party MPs by email or by comment to their website at www.maoriparty.com, calling on them to withdraw their support and to let this bill lapse. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000346\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EIn speaking to Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, I note that although the bill says it takes away Crown ownership and replaces it with a no-ownership regime called common space, in fact it still leaves statutory authority with the Crown. Thus it continues the confiscation of M\u0101ori rights to the foreshore and seabed first established by the Foreshore and Seabed Act in 2004 by simply changing the title of the legislation in 2011 to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. As my whanaunga Shane Jones rightly pointed out, it is nothing but a legal fiction, a play on words to calm the fears of M\u0101ori people. But it is still a confiscation of M\u0101ori rights to the foreshore and seabed. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000347\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EThe bill we are discussing tonight raises issues such as those in Part 2, as well as in every other part of the bill that less than 1 percent of M\u0101oridom have seen, leaving hundreds of thousands of M\u0101ori people to ask why M\u0101ori Party members have not bothered to come back to explain what is actually in the bill, to thank me for opposing it, and to ask why on earth M\u0101ori Party members are saying they are so proud to support it. Then, after all the changes made in the Committee of the whole House, including here, where we are discussing Part 2 of the bill, we will end up with a bill that less than 0.01 percent of M\u0101oridom will have even seen before it comes back to the House for its third and final reading. This will happen not just because National wants it to be that way but because the M\u0101ori Party has given its full support to the final version of this bill being rammed through the House without M\u0101ori people being given any opportunity whatsoever to consider the consequences of a bill that will have long-lasting and probably devastating implications for M\u0101ori land rights. That is why M\u0101ori people are telling me how angry they are. They are desperately asking me why on earth M\u0101ori Party members are saying they are so proud to support this bill. It is a question I simply cannot answer. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000348\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EThe bill ensures under Part 2 that the Government will always have the final say in determining what customary title will be, which is not what we marched for in 2004. So of course M\u0101ori people are asking why on earth M\u0101ori Party members are saying they are so proud to support this bill, and they are telling me how grateful they are that I am opposing it. Then, after going through Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, etc., when they finally get to see the bill\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000349\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d9d9f5c74519460ba516e7bad7b41337\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. You ruled earlier on that relevancy was not a point of order. I suggest to you that under Standing Order 107 it is an issue of order. We have been told in this Chamber many a time that we need to concentrate on what is before us\u2014clause, part, or whatever. This is a general debate speech.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000350\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d9eb9412279c4927818ec9ad1c002894\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: The point is a fair point, and I probably did not explain myself particularly well. The member who raised the original point of order got up and made a statement, and never asked a question regarding a point of order. With regard to relevancy, it is an issue that is of importance, but it is one I believe the Chair is monitoring at this stage. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000351\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022789f7b697cee46049e6b39b18003fce8\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. Just to be of some further assistance, I say that if members are bringing up points of order it would probably help if they referred to either the Standing Order or the issue. Mr Quinn did not refer to relevancy, nor did he refer to a particular Standing Order. I am sure next time he will get it right.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000352\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c31db8367d334fbe9dae77be63565cdf\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: I am not sure that was helpful. I know the member might have thought it was helpful but I am not sure it was. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000353\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022900626fb700342c1bcbb6f9e9b7cb850\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. It is of course open to the Chair to determine when there is repetition or irrelevancy, which is relevant to the Chair\u2019s decision as to when he accepts a closure motion. I ask that the Chair observe that there are new matters being raised by the Opposition parties\u2014Labour and some other parties\u2014and that if one particular party is straying from the Standing Orders it does not mean that there are no relevant matters still being raised by Opposition parties. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000354\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002277b44c221c3f4df79ab7dd9a70640b90\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: I am almost offended that the member has to raise that matter with me. I take great care about closures. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000355\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ab5bdfc836144829af1fa57b930826b7\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA\u003C/span\u003E: T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chair. T\u0113n\u0101 t\u0101tou katoa e te Whare. When they finally get to see the bill, M\u0101ori will see that under Part 2 of the bill local authorities can apply for compensation at full market value for the loss of any foreshore and seabed they may have under their control. Of course M\u0101ori will be asking themselves how come local bodies will get compensation just by asking for it but M\u0101ori, before they even get a look in, will have to prove that they have held exclusive use and occupation of the area since 1840, without substantial interruption, and that the area in question was held in accordance with tikanga. They will no doubt be asking again why on earth M\u0101ori Party members are saying they are so proud to support the bill, and again they will be telling me how grateful they are that I am opposing it. M\u0101ori will know that their own iwi leadership has withdrawn their support for the bill, including for Part 2, raising again the question of why on earth M\u0101ori Party members are saying they are so proud to support the bill, and again M\u0101ori are telling me how grateful they are that I am opposing it. When M\u0101ori realise that of the 70 submissions on this bill\u2014including those on Part 2\u2014from wh\u0101nau, hap\u016B, iwi, marae, and M\u0101ori organisations, only one supported this bill, it is no wonder they are asking why on earth M\u0101ori Party members say they are so proud to support this bill when 95 percent of M\u0101ori submissions are in support of the position I have taken in opposing it. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000356\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EThat is I why I need to also ask whether the M\u0101ori Party knows that under Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill roads owned by the Government or anyone else will still be owned by the Government or anyone else, but not by M\u0101ori, even if they win their claim. If M\u0101ori Party members know that, why on earth are they telling everyone that it is their bill and that they are proud to be supporting it? Do M\u0101ori Party members know that under Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill any piece of the foreshore and seabed that M\u0101ori cannot afford to go to court to get back will no longer be common space, nor will it be held for M\u0101ori, but it will go back to the Crown? If M\u0101ori Party members do in fact know that, why on earth are they telling everyone that it is their bill and that they are proud to be supporting it? Do M\u0101ori Party members know that under Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill the Minister of Conservation will be the manager of the common space, and that the Minister of M\u0101ori Affairs will not have a role in that management activity at all? If M\u0101ori Party members do in fact know that, why on earth are they telling everyone that it is their bill and that they are proud to be supporting it?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000357\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EBecause of those issues I note, too, that M\u0101ori are asking some pretty basic questions right now, such as whether this is what M\u0101ori people marched for in 2004. The answer is no. Is this what they voted for the M\u0101ori Party for in 2005? The answer is no. Is this what M\u0101ori wanted out of the coalition with National in 2008? The answer is also no. Is this what M\u0101ori expected out of new legislation in 2011? The answer to that is also no.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000358\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EYet the M\u0101ori Party is saying that this is not National\u2019s bill, it is the M\u0101ori Party\u2019s bill, and that it is proud to be supporting it, even though, when Te Ururoa Flavell was asked who was running the timetable, he said it was National, when he was asked who wrote the bill, he said it was National, and when he was asked whose bill it was, he said it was National\u2019s\u2014and even though Tariana Turia said that if we were negotiating on what was fair, just, and moral, then we would have a very different outcome. This bill is not the M\u0101ori Party\u2019s bill. Neither is this Part 2 of this particular bill. It is National\u2019s Part 2, and it is National\u2019s bill. It is not true to say that the M\u0101ori Party is proud to support this bill, because it does not. The M\u0101ori Party caucus supports it\u2014that is obvious\u2014but the members do not. I know that, because I received hundreds of emails, texts, Facebook messages, voicemails, and comments from M\u0101ori Party members telling me they were gutted by what their caucus was doing, and they were leaving the party in droves over the M\u0101ori Party caucus\u2019s betrayal of this cornerstone issue for the party. Thank you. Kia ora t\u0101tou katoa.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00220bfa5b74-8933-458a-99d4-bbd75d9898d0\u0022 data-id=\u002292039ceb511d4d8c8785b7de20285cb2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000359\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220bfa5b74-8933-458a-99d4-bbd75d9898d0\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002292039ceb511d4d8c8785b7de20285cb2\u0022\u003ECHRIS AUCHINVOLE (National\u2014West Coast - Tasman):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022 data-id=\u0022d43ccd40362442a98a05256c1385bcb2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000360\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d43ccd40362442a98a05256c1385bcb2\u0022\u003EHon MITA RIRINUI (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E Before I talk about particular aspects of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, and, in particular, clause 11, I want to acknowledge the comments made by the previous speaker, Hone Harawira. A lot of what he said was true. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000361\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022aab05bf3391044458dcc4a59c44a27c5\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: A new coalition partner? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000362\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f05bd79b6a304a27aa9f7da08ce3b9ba\u0022\u003EHon MITA RIRINUI\u003C/span\u003E: I do not have to be a coalition partner with anyone to recognise the truth, I say to Mr Henare. It is interesting\u2014I have a very long memory, and Mr Harawira identified some of the issues that the M\u0101ori Party campaigned on in 2005. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000363\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EAs I said, I have a very long memory, and part of my memory is a particular hui in Tauranga, at which the Hon Georgina te Heuheu was present, the Hon Nanaia Mahuta was present, I was present, and the candidate\u2014now the member\u2014for Waiariki was present. We talked a lot about the technical issues of the 2004 legislation. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000364\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EIt is interesting that the very issues on which we were challenged as incumbent MPs are the very issues that are covered in clause 11. One of those issues was that of partnership. As incumbent Labour members at that time, we had to admit that we were struggling for answers. There was an issue associated with partnership. People in our communities could not quite understand why we had accepted legislation that was not very clear about the partnership between M\u0101ori and the Crown. I have to say that this bill is even less clear, because it transfers the relationship between M\u0101ori and the Crown, established in the 2004 legislation, to a relationship between M\u0101ori and an unidentified, undefined group of people called the New Zealand public. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000365\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EMy argument at this time supports that of Hone Harawira. When M\u0101ori signed the Treaty in 1840 it was directly with the Crown. Although it has taken some time for us to accept and understand the nature and extent of the relationship, we have, by and large, developed a level of confidence and trust in it. For M\u0101ori the question is who we are dealing with now. Who are we dealing with when we sit down with Crown officials and representatives, and Government Ministers, to talk about our customary rights? We are not really sure. We might say that we are right back to where we were in February 1840\u2014there is a lack of trust, a lack of confidence, and a lack of understanding. That is exactly what clause 11 achieves. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000366\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EAt the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee it was clear that the vast majority of the submitters\u2014most of them, if not all of them\u2014were totally opposed to the removal of the takutai moana from Crown ownership, because it created an environment of uncertainty for M\u0101ori. I am wondering how the member for Waiariki can go out on the hustings to promote this particular bill\u2014which contains the issue that was of concern to him and his colleagues, including Hone Harawira, in 2005\u2014and take ownership of it. That is a very, very unusual move, and M\u0101ori, particularly in the central North Island, will not accept it. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000367\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EI am sure the Hon Georgina te Heuheu is aware of the meeting I mentioned, because she was quite vocal at that meeting, and she condemned particular parts of the 2004 legislation. That being what it is, I have a long memory as a politician, but others have very short memories. In fact, they hate to be reminded of statements they made at any time during their political careers. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000368\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224d9e1e98cbd3437dbfa74f47de6045ec\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: The worm turns. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000369\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022baecdc2ec3e14f4690c462691c801d72\u0022\u003EHon MITA RIRINUI\u003C/span\u003E: It is interesting that the two people who have interjected the most in this debate are the very two people who were not present at any of those meetings, including the great h\u012Bkoi that came down the country, although they have a lot to say about it. I will forgive them for that. One of them just happens to be related to me. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000370\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EWe can understand why the member from Te Tai Tokerau, Hone Harawira, has issues with his former colleagues from the M\u0101ori Party. I wonder whether the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General, will take a call very soon and explain, not only for the members of this Committee but also for the M\u0101ori community in general, how this new relationship will work. We have parts of the takutai moana, meaning the dry land, which in M\u0101ori terms is part of the takutai moana. Where that is common, it is in Crown ownership, whereas the land that is below the high-water mark\u2014in other words, the wet areas of the takutai moana\u2014is in public ownership. That is how the bill describes the situation to us. This part of the bill is for many M\u0101ori communities the area that really requires some clarification, and I hope the Minister takes the opportunity to clarify those points. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000371\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EThe other point that came up at the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee was the issue of the extinguishment of customary rights under the 2004 legislation. Given that many M\u0101ori were led to believe that customary rights, in terms of their customary rights, are abstract, and did not exist in law prior to 2004\u2014apart from the fisheries settlement, which was pretty clear and defined\u2014exactly which rights were extinguished? That was not very clear, and it is not very clear in Part 2 what rights are being restored as a result of the repeal of the 2004 legislation. I invite the Minister to take the opportunity to clarify that, because I am very interested. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000372\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EPart 1 discussed codification of customary rights, but it also raised a whole lot of issues to do with the role of iwi in terms of applications to the High Court. Unfortunately, when we go to that level of the judicial system, everything else becomes codified in law. Tikanga becomes codified. Manaakitanga becomes codified\u2014[Interruption]. Yes, it does, I say to the Minister in the chair. When the High Court makes a decision on what tikanga and other customary practices are, it codifies them in law, and that is why M\u0101ori were determined that direct negotiations with the Crown were necessary, because in rangatira ki te rangitira there is an understanding about what each other\u2019s values mean. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000373\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EUnfortunately, M\u0101ori see that codification through the High Court process will be a one-size-fits-all approach. If we codify something in law, that is what it is. I give members an example. Te Arawa will have a different definition of tikanga from M\u0101taatua, and that is good; it is the diversity of the people we deal with and live with every day. Te \u0100tiawa will have a different definition of what tikanga means to them from that of Ng\u0101ti Toa, even though they live in the same geographic area, so that becomes a huge problem, particularly when the High Court, or any court, makes a decision on what those terms mean. For M\u0101ori that locks us into an understanding of our own world that we are not comfortable with, and I am sure the Minister will have thought about that. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000374\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EMy whanaunga Paul Quinn will be aware that Ng\u0101ti Awa are very, very rigid in terms of their definitions, and no law in the land will tell them any different. [Interruption] If he supports this bill, he will have to explain to them why he supported the codification of their practices for the sake of political expediency. That will be very difficult for him to explain to them. Tau Henare will have to do the same to his Ng\u0101ti Hine, Ng\u0101ti Wai people. That is the difficulty we have here, and that is the value, as Apirana M\u0101huika would have said in direct negotiations with Crown Ministers over the customary interests of Ng\u0101ti Porou on the East Coast. He sat down with Crown officials and Ministers and told them what it meant for Ng\u0101ti Porou, and that was accepted. There was no argument about it. The Crown, however, said: \u201CThis is our tikanga.\u201D, and Ng\u0101ti Porou accepted that. By mutual agreement a deal was done and an outcome was achieved. It was signed off, and the Minister in the chair, the Hon Chris Finlayson, was fortunate to have been able to sign it off. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000375\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002273f60731-048d-4a21-81c5-52d588de2325\u0022\u003EBut the value of that relationship has now gone, because we are talking about codification. Everything that M\u0101ori once believed in will be codified in law, particularly where takutai moana is concerned. That in itself is an extinguishment of our practices. Kia ora.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022 data-id=\u00225f5b1a51f0b84875ac08ba2dc269f26f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000376\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225f5b1a51f0b84875ac08ba2dc269f26f\u0022\u003ECHRIS TREMAIN (Senior Whip\u2014National):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022 data-id=\u002273bfa81b73914a8a9017ac274d71dfe2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000377\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002273bfa81b73914a8a9017ac274d71dfe2\u0022\u003EHon NANAIA MAHUTA (Labour\u2014Hauraki-Waikato):\u003C/span\u003E I am pleased to speak to Part 2. Having listened to earlier contributions, I think the member for Te Tai Tokerau got it just about right when he highlighted where M\u0101ori opinion is with regard to this takutai moana legislation. He wrapped it up in eight succinct words: \u201CThis isn\u2019t what we marched for in 2004.\u201D The then aspirants and candidates for the M\u0101ori Party went out across the country to promote exactly what was wrong with the 2004 legislation and did so in many forums. With regard to Part 2, and specifically clause 11(2), when the concept of public domain was initially raised by Labour, M\u0101ori did not like it and National did not like it, so it went out. When the issue of Crown ownership was raised, M\u0101ori did not like it, yet all of a sudden the M\u0101ori Party is going out and promoting common space as if, for some great and glorious reason or miracle, M\u0101ori have all of a sudden changed their minds. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000378\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EI think the member for Te Tai Tokerau had it right: M\u0101ori did not like it then, they do not like it now, yet the M\u0101ori Party has changed its stripes. One thing we can always say about the member for Te Tai Tokerau in terms of where the M\u0101ori Party is at on this issue is that the member is absolutely telling the truth. Those members are finding it difficult to promote a bill that, in their heart of hearts, they know M\u0101ori do not want. There are inherently wrong concepts in this legislation that people did not like then and do not like now. The M\u0101ori Party should vote against the bill if it is being true to its word of having the moral mandate to represent the opinion of M\u0101ori in this Chamber. Those members campaigned long and hard in 2004 on the principles that they are now changing their stripes on, and that is inherently wrong. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000379\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EThere are specific issues in clause 11 that we should be debating. Subclause (2) states: \u201CNeither the Crown nor any other person owns, or is capable of owning, the common marine and coastal area, as in existence from time to time after the commencement of this Part.\u201D I ask the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General, a question in relation to his negotiations with the M\u0101ori Party in that respect. I ask what he was able to convince them of that was so much better than Crown ownership, because every submission, and certainly in the brief that we have had from officials, highlights\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000380\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223a6072108d1149dc99d61208bcf33de3\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: Nanaia, where does Tainui stand?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000381\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002297c93ed7c1e643a2a4f4b1818d5369e4\u0022\u003EHon NANAIA MAHUTA\u003C/span\u003E: Tainui stands where it has always stood, and it will preserve its interests on much of the coastal area through the Treaty claims settlement process. That was the case in 2004 and that is the case now. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000382\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002287673a8e5afc4259a6fab6ef3b620a0d\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: They support it. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000383\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f53124548b584ba8b5c38aa7a4f03e26\u0022\u003EHon NANAIA MAHUTA\u003C/span\u003E: I will debate that at any time, anywhere, with that member in my electorate. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000384\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EComing back to clause 11(2), I ask the Minister how he was able to convince the M\u0101ori Party that common space was so beneficial to the interests of M\u0101ori when they assert their customary title interests. My reading of Part 2\u2014and I stand to be corrected, if the Minister would take a call\u2014is that any customary title is secondary to the interests represented in the common space. For example, none of the submitters highlighted that they were comfortable with the idea of common title. They said that it is largely symbolic, and the fact that the Crown retains much of its authority over that space clearly highlights that customary title will be secondary to the intention of this bill. I would be grateful if the Minister took a call, because the submissions highlighted those matters. There was not enough time in the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee to go through these matters in some detail with officials. I think that is the height of arrogance when submissions raise matters that are not responded to in the fullness of time to ensure a full, lengthy, and thorough debate. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000385\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022301483a2e2734f9dbd4b84300be541d2\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: We had plenty of time. Some of us actually read it, Nanaia.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000386\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ad46526f86564814a9cde3eb283da211\u0022\u003EHon NANAIA MAHUTA\u003C/span\u003E: The member may call across the Chamber to try to shout me down, but that same member will not debate these issues in my electorate, which I challenge him to do at any time, any place, anywhere. I ask him to be there, because I will be. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000387\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002270dd644d-8bcf-40dc-998a-887d62d24a76\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b9ce9e8265214a88906812e4ff68a22c\u0022\u003EMoana Mackey\u003C/span\u003E: It\u2019d help if he would do some work-outs in this place.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000388\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002253d43ba19e4b4b4da677cbf7e5ec43b4\u0022\u003EHon NANAIA MAHUTA\u003C/span\u003E: It would. It certainly would, but that is not going to happen. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000389\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EHaving had my speech interrupted because of Mr Quinn, I will now highlight some of the issues related to the points made by Local Government New Zealand. I will cut straight to the questions, because I think they hit at the nub of undertakings on divestment in clause 11(3). I ask the Minister what guarantee he will give to local authorities that land in the takutai moana area that was acquired after 2004 will be compensated for. I also ask how that compensation level will be set, because my understanding of subclause (5) is that the takutai moana area is not a rateable area. I ask how the level of compensation will be set. When we have an opportunity for the Minister to respond on this matter, I certainly think that Local Government New Zealand and a couple of local councils will be quite interested in his response. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000390\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EI also ask the Minister what happens to unformed roads in the coastal marine area and whether they will be included in terms of the divestment provisions of clause 11. I would appreciate it if the Minister would take a call and provide some clarity on this issue. For a number of local authorities, the way to treat unformed legal roads is a vexed issue. I would appreciate it if the Minister would take a call on this matter. I know that submitters raised it as an issue. It would be helpful to get that clarification to provide a level of certainty to Local Government New Zealand on the matters it highlighted in its submission on the bill. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000391\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EI continue to say that one of the things I find absolutely incredible is the M\u0101ori Party\u2019s changing of its stripes on the issue of common space. It is the one key point that I want to make in my first contribution to this debate. At the time when the issue of public domain was raised initially, the then aspirants to the M\u0101ori Party were absolutely opposed to that concept. They were also absolutely opposed to the concept of Crown ownership, but somehow or other, somebody has said something to persuade them to say that common space is of far greater benefit to M\u0101ori than anything else. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000392\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EM\u0101ori Party members should stand in the Chamber and explain their position to at least the members of the House. It is all well and good to hold hui outside this place and try to promote something while everybody is saying: \u201CHang on, you have changed your stripes.\u201D, but they are unable to present to the House as a coalition partner to the Government the principled basis on which they now support the idea of common space, as contained in clause 11(2) in Part 2. They will not explain it to members. They are treating members with disregard and disrespect. That is the height of arrogance on a bill so important to the nation of New Zealand and so important in terms of ensuring what we had hoped would be a common opportunity for members across the House to find some common ground. Clearly, there is not that opportunity, and the Government will continue to ram this bill through. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000393\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220e7e8da2-a6a1-41bb-aeb0-a49be255a293\u0022\u003EThe Minister has those questions on the record. I hope that in the course of this debate he is able to respond to those questions. I believe that it is also beholden on M\u0101ori Party members to respond. Having the moral weight of M\u0101ori opinion on their shoulders, they should demonstrate that they are true to their word, will walk their talk, and will make good on the commitments that they say are being supported by a number of M\u0101ori throughout the country. Clearly, the member for Te Tai Tokerau has got it just about right: everybody has been duped by the M\u0101ori Party. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022 data-id=\u002212cd29d96fc641619b5db9de6059da80\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000394\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a68928ea-9dd8-4a30-8e2c-a0f49dfc8bea\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002212cd29d96fc641619b5db9de6059da80\u0022\u003ELOUISE UPSTON (National\u2014Taup\u014D):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022 data-id=\u0022fe8cc2110b0d43459ef47f04bdb7ff70\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000395\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022fe8cc2110b0d43459ef47f04bdb7ff70\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I am pleased to take a call\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000396\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229bd8fa5c5ebe43fe8e0521d121be220b\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. That member was sitting on his behind; he did not even call and you called him. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000397\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c2d2075333514f98886781727fc58682\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: The member called at the same time as the member who took the call. I did not look up, but I registered him as a member who had not had a call at that point, so I have given him the call.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000398\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b71bae83dc7348928b7c50e0fa5f8fcc\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES\u003C/span\u003E: Thank you, Mr Chairman; there is no one as angry as a former talkback radio host.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000399\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220f7a181691f444f5909b9e9f7ea985b2\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I apologise to my colleague for making him sit down. Given the ongoing flouting of your ruling by Tau Henare, who was calling across the Chamber after my colleague was invited to speak and had started speaking, which is when that member should have sat down, I think it might be time for you to educate him on the rule that when the presiding officer is ruling, a member does have to sit down.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000400\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b53df596fc144d0e9abd27ab84f17865\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Points of order will be heard in silence. I will manage the Committee. I am fully aware that there is quite a bit of passion over this bill. I am endeavouring to give a fair call for both sides.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000401\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ca1b4e3049284a1d87c8a97fbcf57f69\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES\u003C/span\u003E: It is a pleasure to take a call on Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. I have listened to the member opposite, the former member of Parliament for Te Tai Tokerau, interject wildly on all the members who are speaking in this debate.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000402\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003EOne of the questions he has put to members on this side of the Chamber is what the position was of certain members in 2004. We never need to ask what the position of Tau Henare was in 2004, because we know what it was. He was on talkback radio, as a Newstalk ZB host, praising Don Brash\u2019s position on this legislation. If members opposite want to raise the question of his position, I say that he was in favour of Don Brash\u2019s position. Remember, Don Brash\u2019s position was that the existing Foreshore and Seabed Act gave M\u0101ori too many rights. The M\u0101ori Party\u2019s position on the Foreshore and Seabed Act was that it gave M\u0101ori too few rights. This is the great reconciliation of the position on Part 2 today: trying to marry together the position of the old National Party\u2014when Tau Henare was in talkback radio land making sure that the supporters who put him into Parliament on the National Party list were against the bill\u2014and lining up the interests of the M\u0101ori Party on Part 2.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000403\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022049a8aba6e0e453d8b464054f6482550\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: What has radio got to do with Part 2?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000404\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022b0beaf36da1c47a1813b6195136fb128\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES\u003C/span\u003E: I say to Paul Quinn that we are on Part 2 of the bill. The reason Paul Quinn will not know about Part 2 of the bill is that he has not made a single contribution to the debate. He is sitting here in Parliament with the other National MPs taking a pause from proceedings, only to clear their BlackBerrys of the emails from their supporters opposing Part 2. The only time those members take a break from interjecting is when they are deleting like crazy the hundreds of emails they are getting from people\u2014their own supporters\u2014who think this is bad legislation, and none of them has the gumption to get up on their pins to speak about why Part 2 is important.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000405\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003EI will ask the Committee some questions about Part 2, particularly clauses 11 and 17. They are the parts I want to focus on this afternoon. I ask the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000406\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229860cf916d12464395afa37412ddf408\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. Again I apologise. This member is not a quiet member, but there appear to be two members opposite who can yell and stand, but not do both at the same time. I ask you to keep them a bit quieter.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000407\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c0e6fef998d74da48ae4442ff10cb9fb\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: The member raises a valid point of order in this respect. I have constantly asked the Committee that interjections be rare and reasonable, and that there be no barraging. At the same time, the member who raised the point of order should not say disparaging things about another member, so I caution him on that as well. Remember that interjections should be rare and reasonable.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000408\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227c6b68c67cf94ca6ab25d602f96cf83b\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES\u003C/span\u003E: I will take my time now to discuss clauses 11 and 17 in Part 2, particularly as they affect the mining sector. The departmental report, which I know was not considered in any enormous detail by the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee, sets up a lot of what the issues are in this part of the bill. I will go through what some of those issues are and seek a response from the Attorney-General to see whether the Committee of the whole House can get a sense of what direction the Government is heading in with them. We have heard from M\u0101ori Party speakers that this bill advances the position of M\u0101ori, yet the departmental report raises a number of issues about ownership and the ability for minerals to be explored and extracted from the coastal and marine area. It is not entirely clear why New Zealand Steel and the New Zealand Minerals Industry Association have expressed such enormous concern for the ability of their industries to participate if these clauses are passed. I note that New Zealand Steel submitted that the bill would have \u201Ca significant dampening effect on investment in the minerals and mining sector, because it insufficiently protects existing rights and consented activities, and also thwarts future development.\u201D\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000409\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003EI would like to know from the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General, whether in regard to his bill\u2014either the bill he has presented, which has not been amended by the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee, but certainly the bill and his, I think, 75-page Supplementary Order Paper of amendments\u2014he is satisfied that the amendments he is pushing forward do answer those concerns about those clauses. If we go particularly to clauses 77 and 78, dealing with the protection of w\u0101hi tapu, it is clear from the position of other speakers in the Committee that somehow these are enhanced for M\u0101ori interests or groups who are seeking customary and marine title, yet when the departmental report gets to the commentary of the Government\u2019s position, it states that the Government\u2019s intent is for the existing use rights to be protected until the end of their term. At the point when they come up for renewal, I ask the Minister in the chair whether this part of the bill kicks in to provide for differing rights for iwi, hap\u016B, and wh\u0101nau groups who are seeking customary and marine title, than would otherwise be the case if they did not need to use this vehicle or these clauses. I think that is a tension within the bill that\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000410\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d5040fd67e7d4df99c554129290ecbd9\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: So what does Ng\u0101ti Porou say?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000411\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227de14498ae734fb98a7adb7fbcfe9b3c\u0022\u003EHon DARREN HUGHES\u003C/span\u003E: Well, Ng\u0101ti Porou, of course, negotiated a deal under the existing Foreshore and Seabed Act. Ng\u0101ti Porou did not need to have the coastal and marine bill, as many of National\u2019s supporters are saying to those members in their email.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000412\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003EBut I want to come back, and not be interrupted or taken astride by those members opposite, to say that Ng\u0101ti Porou were able to use the existing legislation to do that. I am trying to get some indication from the Minister\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ffff330f-1757-41d6-9973-25244f0fdada\u0022 data-id=\u0022c692995990d3421e9d29a52c86603cd1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000413\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ffff330f-1757-41d6-9973-25244f0fdada\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c692995990d3421e9d29a52c86603cd1\u0022\u003ECOLIN KING (National\u2014Kaik\u014Dura):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022 data-id=\u00226db93725af1f40d2b7be7c19360eb020\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000414\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226db93725af1f40d2b7be7c19360eb020\u0022\u003EHILARY CALVERT (ACT):\u003C/span\u003E In Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill I will speak about clauses 11, 24, and 27. I will start with clause 11, which we have heard a bit about already, as members have been talking about the special status of the common marine and coastal area. Clause 11(2) states: \u201CNeither the Crown nor any other person owns, or is capable of owning, the common marine and coastal area,\u201D. My question\u2014and I would like the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General, to take a call, as clearly we would like other questions to be answered tonight, too\u2014is whether, if the Government does not own and is not even capable of owning an area, that area is still part of New Zealand at that point. Although the bill seeks to clarify this issue by stating that this legislation does not affect the sovereignty of New Zealand, it is certainly unclear how an area of some hundreds of thousands of square kilometres, which has been owned by the Crown since the territorial waters limit has been 12 nautical miles, can become an area that the Crown neither owns nor is capable of owning. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000415\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EClause 24 talks about land in the common marine and coastal area, and land above the line of mean high water springs. During the hearing of submissions in the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee much was made of the idea that 12,243 private land titles exist in the foreshore and seabed. That figure is correct, but it is quite misleading. It has been argued, quite reasonably, that if we are happy to give freehold titles to many other people in the foreshore and seabed, then why should we not allow freehold title to go to M\u0101ori. ACT believes that it is for the courts to decide, on the basis of common law property rights, the extent of any property rights granted, whether they be freehold title or otherwise. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000416\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EIn dealing with this bill, however, it is important to understand that only 48 freehold titles have been issued in the foreshore and seabed. The rest of those 12,243 titles have been created by legislation and the forces of nature. Freehold title abutting the edge of the foreshore has, for many years, been defined as ending on the seaward side at the mean high-tide mark. When a definition was made of the foreshore and seabed the landward edge was defined as the \u201Cmean high-water springs\u201D, which is a tad further away from the sea than the mean high-tide mark. As a result, this definition captured a sliver of land in about 11,000 titles, and redefined those titles as part of the foreshore and seabed. Another thousand or so titles have become part of the foreshore and seabed as a result of erosion. The edge of the land in those freehold titles has been taken by the sea, leaving a part of the title under the sea and therefore part of the foreshore and seabed. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000417\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003ESo, apart from the titles that the Government has redefined into the foreshore and seabed, and the titles that nature has taken into the sea, there are only 48 titles that have been granted to the foreshore and seabed in the whole of New Zealand. Those titles cover a tiny 2.6 square kilometres of our hundreds of thousands of square kilometres of territorial seas. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000418\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EI come to clause 27. After ACT pushed the Government into accepting free access, it was not guaranteed in the original draft of the bill. The Attorney-General\u2019s proposed amendment guarantees free access only for the individual, an expression that, typically, has a limited legal definition. When my colleague John Boscawen asked the Attorney-General whether this guaranteed everyone free access he, true to form, could not do so. Any member of the public would look at this clause and wonder why only the individual is protected. Why not insert the word \u201Cgroup\u201D? Can we imagine a group going to the beach and being told that they must pay for access? I can, because the people who threaten and cajole the public now will continue to do so once this bill is law. The Attorney-General has just made it a whole lot easier for them to do so. ACT has heard accounts of people who, while having picnics, taking wedding photos, or just going for a walk, have been threatened or told to pay up. Nothing in this clause will discourage that from happening in the future. ACT has put forward a Supplementary Order Paper that makes it clear that anyone and everyone should be able to enjoy our foreshore and seabed, free of charge. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000419\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EThe Hon David Parker made a comment yesterday about this clause, as did the Minister. Part of the confusion that the Minister may have had seems to come from the unfortunate use of the word \u201Caccess\u201D. For most people the idea of access encompasses the idea of movement across something or to something. But this bill is not about providing access to the foreshore and seabed. The entire clause concerns what may be done by those who are on the foreshore and seabed. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000420\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EI come now to the ACT Party\u2014and this is where the Hon David Parker was going yesterday, when he asked us a question. He asked us why, if we are the party that wants to support property rights, we would deny the holder of a customary marine title the ability to charge. The ACT Party supports the right for anyone to go to court\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000421\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224334902910644187a180f8906fd3d6f5\u0022\u003EKelvin Davis\u003C/span\u003E: No, he said \u201Cuse\u201D. He said: \u201Cuse the foreshore.\u201D\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000422\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002214cd7ac1e30f4767a5454d00ecf0493b\u0022\u003EHILARY CALVERT\u003C/span\u003E: Sorry, I am corrected. The Hon David Parker said that we were against people charging to use the foreshore. We support the right of anyone to go to the High Court to have a determination of their common law rights. This bill takes away those rights. It allows for the possibility of a very different and novel sort of property right, one that does not need to be tested by the courts. It takes away the right to go to court for the establishment of common law rights, and it replaces that with the right to go to court in a limited and very different way. The novel sort of property right that the Minister seems determined to create is one that does not need to be tested by the courts, and one that gives rights that override the resource management rights of others. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000423\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EWe in the ACT Party support and defend the rights that the court provides, including the right to charge and the right to deny access to others if the court so determines. We do not support the ability to go to the M\u0101ori Land Court, which was mentioned earlier as being the appropriate place to go to. For the ACT Party the High Court is the right place. These rights are common to everybody; they are common law rights. They are not rights that are specifically to do with M\u0101ori in New Zealand. The property that we are discussing\u2014the whole purpose of the bill\u2014is the total property in New Zealand\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000424\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220bd5aa67-2f2b-4a13-a2b4-21a392396f11\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222032f802187e4034a0faab2b58e76ea5\u0022\u003EHon Georgina te Heuheu\u003C/span\u003E: What\u2019s wrong with that? They\u2019re still rights. They\u2019re still legal rights.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000425\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002296f06b144c5347fcbd367a7edd1ba1fc\u0022\u003EHILARY CALVERT\u003C/span\u003E: They are legal rights, but they are not rights that are in some way only the interests of M\u0101ori. Those rights are the interests of everybody in New Zealand. They are appropriately transferred if the courts decide on that. The Treaty of Waitangi gave everyone in New Zealand the ability to go to the courts in the same way that British subjects could. The courts that we go to\u2014the whole lot of British subjects in New Zealand\u2014are the courts that the High Court system is part of. If we go only to the M\u0101ori courts for those rights, then we are talking about a huge chunk of land that, despite the fact that the Government has disowned it and for some reason does not feel comfortable about owning any longer, New Zealanders still consider they have an interest in. That is not just M\u0101ori New Zealanders but all New Zealanders. It is a strange thing that the Government wants to\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022 data-id=\u0022dfc0bba2d8a2466eb200d1b4110d6c89\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000426\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002218f9e3ea-81c5-4414-af48-d6bb843a9227\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022dfc0bba2d8a2466eb200d1b4110d6c89\u0022\u003EMELISSA LEE (National):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022 data-id=\u0022d2432468ff8146e79d9bd3b03e9fc1d5\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000427\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d2432468ff8146e79d9bd3b03e9fc1d5\u0022\u003EKEITH LOCKE (Green):\u003C/span\u003E I think there is a bit of inconsistency in ACT\u2019s position. Hilary Calvert said there is not really much private land in the foreshore and seabed; there is just a bit as a result of erosion. She talked about how to define the high-tide mark and about how 48 other grants of title amounted to not much land, so we should not worry about it, at all. Well, why then in Part 2 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill exclude\u2014and I think ACT probably supports this position\u2014private title land from the application of the common marine and coastal area, all the access provisions, and all the rest of it? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000428\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EIt is inconsistent that M\u0101ori customary title land should be subject to full access. The legislation states that every individual has the right \u201Cto pass and repass in, on, over, and across the common marine and coastal area; and to engage in recreational activities\u201D, etc., yet, for private foreshore and seabed land, that right does not apply under clause 19. Surely, if we are to be a fair society, that inconsistency should be redressed, and the private title should not be sacrosanct in terms of public access. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000429\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EHilary Calvert says that that provision does not relate to general access to the area. In fact, I think what Parliament should address and develop\u2014and, unfortunately, this bill does not do so; attempts have been made with committees and all kinds of things, but they really have got nowhere\u2014greater access to the seashore for all New Zealanders. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000430\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EThere have been some big fights over this issue. On Waiheke Island John Spencer prevented public access for people on Waiheke Island to the beaches his land surrounded. If one looks around the world one sees other examples\u2014for instance, in Britain. I was over in Britain a few years ago when my brother used to live there. He lives in Wellington now. We went for a walk. They had not only all sorts of alleyways that people could use everywhere in the countryside but also what was called a right to roam, whereby one could\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000431\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002291353a5e3f9a42e48a4be02a2d787840\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: Over private property?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000432\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229bec51bcf3e94df1a82a70393f11500d\u0022\u003EKEITH LOCKE\u003C/span\u003E: Yes, over private property. The right to roam was well established and supported by the people of Great Britain. We should have something similar to that system in New Zealand, so that all the pristine beaches we have are accessible instead of being shut off from ordinary people who cannot get to those beaches. Sometimes boaties can get to them; they are usually the richer section of the population. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000433\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EThe right to roam relates to another project, the great project by Geoff Chapple of Te Araroa, \u201Cthe long pathway\u201D around New Zealand. A lot of that pathway is around the coast, and having provisions for greater access to the coastal area would help with the continuity of those paths, in order for people to be able to enjoy the scenery along the waterfront around this country. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000434\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022b8383f38-c78c-4e5d-8324-677d91e95c49\u0022\u003EIt is important that we try to redress this access issue in the Committee stage. Unfortunately, clause 19, which excludes private property, contrasts with clause 27, which gives all of the rights of access to every individual in relation to what could be M\u0101ori customary title, and that just does not wash. The Green Party is very much against that contradiction and would like greater rights for New Zealand people as a whole and greater rights for M\u0101ori people\u2014greater rights than exist under the bill. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022 data-id=\u00227f176685d6de4312a7aed3a1784a1774\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000435\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00224a25943b-cb3b-49c3-bd10-74316fae17f1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00227f176685d6de4312a7aed3a1784a1774\u0022\u003EJACQUI DEAN (National\u2014Waitaki):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022a8303a57f1c1493fb6613158eff3cc42\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EMotion agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000436\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 62, Noes 59.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000437\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e22a3049c7804520b25027315c6c2311\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 11, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, to substitute or reorder words that do not alter the meaning of the bill are ruled out of order. The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 12(1), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, to substitute words that do not alter the meaning of the bill are also ruled out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000438\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 12(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fbf9b67e2aff41fdb7d501b98499f2bf\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000439\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000440\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 12(3) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00226db26e8cefe2401abd29cd266c00f73b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000441\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000442\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002268f0c31e025647cd94a956c78c7672c1\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 12(4), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is ruled out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000443\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 13 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220f51609789f74030954a0d24270337d6\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000444\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 62, Noes 59.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000445\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227c81efd1cbbf49678f347d203d77eaef\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I remind members that when votes are taken there needs to be silence. I ask members to respect that, please.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000446\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 13, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with the previous decision to omit clause 13.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000447\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 15 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002203937d76dbd6402b8ac098d5c4cd6676\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 67\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; ACT New Zealand 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 53\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000448\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 67, Noes 54.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000449\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229d605ec73ef341fb8f33628547c414da\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 15, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to omit clause 15. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000450\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe typescript amendment in the name of the Hon David Parker to insert new clause 15A is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to insert new clause 4B in Part 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000451\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 16 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00221083545e76294d168d5a5d61601d62bc\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000452\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 62, Noes 59.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000453\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fb8ceac092fa45a59e1cda4a690de247\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 16, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to omit clause 16. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000454\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clauses 17(1) and 17(2) are ruled out of order as not being serious amendments, because they do not alter the meaning of the bill. The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 17(2) to omit \u201Cnatural condition\u201D and substitute \u201Cnatural state\u201D, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is ruled out of order as not being a serious amendment, because it does not alter the meaning of the bill.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000455\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 17(2) to omit \u201Cfavour of the Crown\u201D and substitute \u201Cfavour of the Crown for the benefit of all New Zealanders\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002236a42d701c8245fd8cc9d327543e0532\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000456\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000457\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022126b1fd6d9ea468380cb7e4996d8e914\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 17(4), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, is out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000458\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 18(1) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f216110080984ec588be9e28e4bd9376\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000459\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022 data-id=\u0022e9671563447c48b0b9b7912ac540fcd8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000460\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e9671563447c48b0b9b7912ac540fcd8\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL (M\u0101ori Party\u2014Waiariki):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. Kua rongo ake i te \u0101huatanga o te k\u014Drero o te mema o Te Tai Tokerau. Ko tana k\u014Drero, kei te whakaae te wh\u0101nau. Ko te wh\u0101nau an\u014D te wh\u0101nau, ko te mema P\u0101remata an\u014D te mema P\u0101remata. Ko te tikanga, ka riro m\u0101na tonu e p\u014Dti m\u014Dna ana. N\u014D reira, koi nei te tikanga o taku k\u014Drero, hei w\u0101nanga m\u0101u.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000461\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[I heard what the member for Te Tai Tokerau said. He said that the family agrees. \u201CWh\u0101nau\u201D is family, and \u201Cmema P\u0101remata\u201D is member of Parliament. According to procedure, he must cast his vote for himself alone, as he is a member of Parliament. So that is the nub of my point of order for you to rule on.] \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022bc7e66d9dc8c4acab9856a3473cf0981\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000462\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022bc7e66d9dc8c4acab9856a3473cf0981\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E Although I was not wearing the earpiece I was getting a translation of the speech, which, I think, could well have been different from the interpreter\u2019s translation that was coming through the earpiece to the Clerk. There is in my mind no doubt that not only that vote but at least one earlier vote was cast in a way that could only be considered irregular. I waited until the end because we know we are not allowed to interrupt during the declaring of votes, but now that a point of order has been raised I think it is appropriate to agree with the member. I think that now we probably have to clarify the earlier votes of the member, because, as Mr Flavell has pretty clearly put it, he has not voted Aye or No; he has basically said what his mother thinks.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022bd9e2db651a14618b78a8759bc5d02f0\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000463\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022bd9e2db651a14618b78a8759bc5d02f0\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I hear the member. Certainly the interpretation that came through to the Clerk was a vote against. In answer to the member\u2019s question about whether someone casting a vote can do so in a manner that is not necessarily the way we normally do it, I would say that if the intent is clear, then the intent is the guiding factor\u2014one can determine what the intent is. As to what the member\u2019s view was in this matter, I am seeking advice at this time, because I do not\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000464\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225b786272a01747bbbf7e5f1c27b1acee\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: Can I say something?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000465\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002263661bfde56a40b3857e7895b955de59\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I invite the member to state a position.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022eb5d4f405e9b4b989b1f6ffba6f2f2e8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000466\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022eb5d4f405e9b4b989b1f6ffba6f2f2e8\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I think I can understand the second time the member did it; it was, I think, slightly different from the first. What he effectively said, in a rough translation, was \u201CThis is the view of my family.\u201D, rather than indicating a specific vote in a particular direction. As to your comments, Mr Chairman, that as long as you know the intent then that is OK, I think if you look at that you will find that it would not work very well. I could make a speech about how my friends\u2014I am an old member of the engineers union and the Wainuiomata rugby club, and I have friends on Facebook\u2014all have a particular view on this legislation. But I do not think you would be any wiser about which way I was voting, and I think that if members were making speeches instead of voting it would take a long time.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022c5be811a49ef49ceb8a80e5daa71a333\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000467\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c5be811a49ef49ceb8a80e5daa71a333\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I hear the member. I have sought advice on this matter. Nothing in the Standing Orders or in Speakers\u2019 rulings describes the way in which members should cast their votes. As I said, if the intent is clear and the number is mentioned as being opposed\u2014which it was\u2014then that is acceptable to the Chair. The matter rests there. I take on board the point of order the member Te Ururoa Flavell raised, but in the absence of any Standing Order or any Speaker\u2019s ruling I have ruled that if the intent is clear, and if one knows exactly what the member is saying in casting a vote, the Chair will accept it.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022 data-id=\u00220a45d2045ec84606bf283a9dab469e46\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000468\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00220a45d2045ec84606bf283a9dab469e46\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL (M\u0101ori Party\u2014Waiariki):\u003C/span\u003E He take whakatau, e te Heamana. Pai t\u0113r\u0101 whakam\u0101rama. He \u0101hua rere k\u0113 te k\u014Drero a te Hon Trevor Mallard. K\u0101re \u014Dku raruraru ki te k\u014Drero o te mema o te N\u014Dta me tana k\u012B mai kei te whakaae t\u014Dku wairua, kei te whakah\u0113 r\u0101nei t\u014Dku wairua. K\u0101re au i te whakah\u0113 i te k\u014Drero, kei te whakaae t\u014Dku mana, kei te whakah\u0113 r\u0101nei t\u014Dku mana. \u0112ngari, ko te rerek\u0113tanga i t\u0113r\u0101 p\u014Dti, ko te k\u014Drero wh\u0101nau. Ka k\u012B mai te mema, k\u0101re t\u014Dku wh\u0101nau i te tautoko. N\u014D reira, ehara i te mea n\u014Dna t\u0113r\u0101 whakaaro, n\u014D t\u014Dna wh\u0101nau k\u0113. Koi n\u0101 te tikanga o taku whakah\u0113.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000469\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. The point made by the Hon Trevor Mallard is slightly different. I do not have a problem when the member for Te Tai Tokerau says he is in favour spiritually, or opposes it spiritually. Or if he says that his integrity is in favour, or against it. But where that vote differs is when it refers to family. The member said to us \u201CMy family opposes it.\u201D But that is not his point of view; it is actually theirs. And that is the reason for my point of order.]\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022a5f24d58886c4b02ae9c7309f0099d0c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000470\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a5f24d58886c4b02ae9c7309f0099d0c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E:I thank the member for those comments. We have not come across this situation before. I am saying that in the absence of any Standing Order or Speaker\u2019s ruling, if the intent is clear and we know the number of votes being cast, then that is acceptable to the Chair, and we will leave it at that at this point.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u002200b1fed9a6924ab9b6235e160d53db81\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000471\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002200b1fed9a6924ab9b6235e160d53db81\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. The problem I have is that although the general direction is probably clear, I do not think that it is absolute. Again, I have colleagues translating for me on both sides, and they are saying that effectively the member said that his family is opposed to this particular measure. Is that roughly it? Yes. Mr Flavell was offended by the inclusion of the word \u201Cfamily\u201D; he brought up the issue on that basis. My view is that there are occasions on which I, as a member of Parliament, cast votes in ways that are different from what my family thinks on particular issues. I think it is important\u2014in fact, it is vital\u2014that we get a clear indication from the member of what his view is. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022e6ca942511fa4051b45d2f91e18dc22d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000472\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e6ca942511fa4051b45d2f91e18dc22d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I apologise to the Committee. There is, in fact, a Speaker\u2019s ruling. I refer members to Speaker\u2019s ruling 67/7: \u201COn a party vote, the Clerk names the party by its official name and the whip responsible for voting then gives the vote. No other comment at all is allowed.\u201D That is the ruling. I trust that it satisfies the member who brought the matter to our attention. There is a Speaker\u2019s ruling and I refer to it again: it is Speaker\u2019s ruling 67/7. I ask the member that in casting future votes he complies with the Speaker\u2019s ruling that I have outlined.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00224479ede97d6c40ae8c49be4473988402\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000473\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224479ede97d6c40ae8c49be4473988402\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. It is a relatively short one. It is to seek an assurance through you, Mr Chairperson, that the member involved had his vote recorded in the way that he wished.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000474\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d3a045b9069e4a1ca0b0148c65ce0d0d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The translation is coming through very clear. I have no doubt\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000475\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bc4c5c6d64f848d4939ccdc94eafac89\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD\u003C/span\u003E: But he did not hear the translation.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022dadc1b8d86f646cdba97d5296718673e\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000476\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022dadc1b8d86f646cdba97d5296718673e\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: No, but we cast the votes here; we know what the votes were. I hear what you are saying. My position, as I said earlier, is that the intent was known, and that is what I ruled on earlier. The member, if he wishes, has the opportunity to hear what the translation is; it is a matter of his discretion whether he wishes to avail himself of it. At this stage that is where the matter lies. Did the Hon John Boscawen have a point of order?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00222e63710425d441dbbb7b81cac376d6f5\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000477\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222e63710425d441dbbb7b81cac376d6f5\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E Can I finish this one? You have indicated that the member has the ability to listen to the translation. It is in fact very hard to stand up with these earpieces in; the earpieces are set up so that people sitting down can hear them.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022edce9399bb884710a5edd00b2d53f229\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000478\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022edce9399bb884710a5edd00b2d53f229\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Right. I will ask the member to confirm that he was voting against, with one vote. Is he confirming that?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000479\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a9430ef336fd4e58a718dffe0e0905b2\u0022\u003EHone Harawira\u003C/span\u003E: I do confirm.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000480\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e48f60bd6fbc4c1da6ef23983930227f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: On both occasions?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000481\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002285365f7ccd2b4caab865d4b47e63d443\u0022\u003EHone Harawira\u003C/span\u003E: On all occasions.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u002241d8e0c7e77e427885d9e3739f7cae67\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000482\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002241d8e0c7e77e427885d9e3739f7cae67\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I would like to raise two separate issues. Members may wish to speak on either one or both of the issues, and you may need to rule on both of the issues. For the sake of convenience I will speak on both issues at the same time. My understanding from listening to the discussion of the last 10 minutes is that Mr Mallard stood up to say that he has been getting a literal translation, presumably from Mr Parekura\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000483\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022691322a4f6d5429cbd2fe97f2e2846f5\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Come to the point of order. This is not a debate. I want to hear the point of order specifically, not a debate.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000484\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022cc6f0f1af5b74670b0655def323f598b\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN\u003C/span\u003E: It seems to me that what has happened in this Chamber is that Mr Horomia has been providing a translation that is different from the official translation\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000485\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002270cdf7db9aaa4ebeb8aacf35cfdfbe77\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: That is not a point of order. We get an interpretation here. That is what the Clerks at the Table do. I have asked the member to confirm the vote he was given and he has confirmed it\u2014end of story. We are moving on. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u0022b7a95e859182432d9c8d546d2204aa08\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000486\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b7a95e859182432d9c8d546d2204aa08\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. With the deepest of respect, you say you are getting a translation, but is it a correct translation? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000487\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227e8c0cae39cb488cae3e21e24038d232\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I have just asked the member to confirm the vote he cast. He confirmed it to the Committee\u2014end of story. I put that question to him. It is all over. He said that what he cast was the correct vote, and that is the interpretation we got. We are now moving on. I do not want to enter on any further discussion on this matter.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u0022f5a42989967b40d4bbf78b518c7de451\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000488\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f5a42989967b40d4bbf78b518c7de451\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I am very sorry, but it seems to me that Hone Harawira was using the word \u201Cfamily\u201D or \u201Cwh\u0101nau\u201D, but the official translation did not say that. How can we be satisfied that the official translation is actually correct?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002299b75e70638b4922abb841c2d52b1434\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000489\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002299b75e70638b4922abb841c2d52b1434\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Sit down! I have just quoted the Speaker\u2019s ruling on what the member should do. I said earlier that if his intentions were known, then, from my point of view, that was satisfactory. I asked the member to confirm quite clearly what his intent was, and he said he voted against. That was very clear as far as I am concerned. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000490\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EBut let me draw your attention to Speaker\u2019s ruling 37/2 on the interpreter\u2019s role: \u201CThe process of interpretation is not merely a matter of transliterating word for word from one language into another. Especially with languages as different in their origins as English and M\u0101ori, this is not possible.\u201D Speakers\u2019 ruling 37/3 states: \u201CThe object of interpreting into English is to enable members listening to the member\u2019s speech to have a reasonable, but not necessarily total, understanding of what is said. As all members have good facility in English it not necessary to interpret English into M\u0101ori. Interpretation is undertaken only when there is a practical need to do so.\u201D I am very satisfied that the answer we got satisfies all\u2014[Interruption] We are not carrying on with this. I have made the points.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00226054fbffc32942fe89c650fae8f75a39\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000491\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226054fbffc32942fe89c650fae8f75a39\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I think we have what could become a serious issue. That Speakers\u2019 ruling is well known. I think it relates to interpretation of long passages. Hansard reporters are very kind and do some tidying up for us; they put down what we meant to say if there are minor errors in our speeches. I am nearly at the point.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000492\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228f445fbe13a84827a351e64f5dab8256\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Please come to the point of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000493\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c2e39dd0c6124b929c42ee42ef953408\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD\u003C/span\u003E: The point is that it appears that the interpreter is tidying up for, and bringing within the Standing Orders, the comments of a member who is clearly outside of the Standing Orders.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000494\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022893e7a198ae24effa199a8b77d4455cb\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I asked the member in all good faith. The member\u2019s word was taken that he voted against. I put that question to him, and he said he voted against. I have taken the member at his word. That is the end of the matter. Let us move on. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000495\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 18(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00223b37b6fae02345ae85235ee405486bd5\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000496\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000497\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 18(3) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002260bfb78c3359472fa8355bec577c273e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 67\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; ACT New Zealand 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 53\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000498\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 67, Noes 54.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022f0885f503b8048219625a9b49325429d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000499\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f0885f503b8048219625a9b49325429d\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. On that occasion, to test our system I voted with additional material. I just wanted to check whether the interpretation included that additional material. If it did, it should have been corrected at the time.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000500\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228909bc00924e40eda9e5086ee7a7138f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The interpreter\u2019s job is to tell us what the vote is. I got the vote, and that is what was recorded. We have announced the votes.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00227b5113af1912466696342789ebbbdda4\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000501\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00227b5113af1912466696342789ebbbdda4\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000502\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225500feaee81542a89c4da31b40cc8558\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: You are trifling with the Chair.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022838e8ac3b68b498a98b787a1b0cf213b\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD\u003C/span\u003E: No, Mr Chairperson.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000504\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022107cfaa8093d486da7d56c954b16b7d7\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: You are trifling with the Chair. I have already ruled.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000505\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e5dcfe5cf3d34397ab8dd554ef8cda2c\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD\u003C/span\u003E: This is a new point of order. Are you indicating to the Committee that it is permissible to be out of order in M\u0101ori, but not in English?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000506\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ef773c10db97417c8b56953cd75101b3\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The interpreter\u2019s role here is just to announce the result. We got the result: it was 42 votes opposed for Labour. That is what has been recorded, and that is what was announced. We will now move on to Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 18(3) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000507\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022eb491640e6584ba68e496d2db020297b\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: Point of order\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000508\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022713e96e06d8a4e63bce73ef5213d91ef\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I am not entertaining any further\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00225cd14860ed4c42ac890d624e98f4a57f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000509\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225cd14860ed4c42ac890d624e98f4a57f\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the Speaker be recalled in order to make a considered ruling on whether it is the role of the interpreter to interpret or to give a vote.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000510\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003EMotion agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000511\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00229a99ab8993e640a8b909b853207dba7f\u0022\u003EHouse resumed.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000512\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u002219a220d72ac4412da689e8272d9dab6b\u0022\u003ESpeaker Recalled\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00228972b24cee2e42fe943a0eaa4d8fdee7\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000513\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228972b24cee2e42fe943a0eaa4d8fdee7\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The Speaker has been recalled and we will have some decorum in this House. This is disgraceful. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000514\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EMr Speaker, you have been recalled on a matter that relates to interpretation during the casting of a vote. The genesis of this matter goes back a little further. The honourable member from the M\u0101ori Party Te Ururoa Flavell challenged the vote cast by the Independent member Hone Harawira, saying that he included in his vote reference to wh\u0101nau\u2014to the family, as such. I ruled at that stage. Speaker\u2019s ruling 67/7 states: \u201COn a party vote, the Clerk names the party by its official name and the whip responsible for voting then gives the vote. No other comment at all is allowed.\u201D As a consequence I asked for a reassurance from the member who had cast the vote on whether he had voted against the amendment that we were considering. He gave an assurance to the Committee, and I took him at his word that that was, in fact, correct. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000515\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003ESubsequent to that, when we moved to the next amendment to be voted on, the Hon Trevor Mallard cast the vote in M\u0101ori and the interpretation that came back satisfied, in my view, the Clerk at the Table, who told me that Labour had voted 42 votes against. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000516\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question arises whether the interpreter has a role in just announcing the result, or whether he needs to interpret it further. My view is that when other parties cast their vote, they cast it for or against, and no other comment is made. That is what Speaker\u2019s ruling 67/7 states. In my mind I was satisfied that the vote cast by Labour, when translated by the interpreter to the Clerk beside me, was correct. On that basis I was happy with that decision. Subsequently there has been a challenge to my ruling in that respect, and you have been recalled, Mr Speaker, to adjudicate.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000517\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002207fe69b0e3824120b2f5ce24e5c0f1db\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I thank the Chair.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022c15a74619ddf49cea7b7431316452ddc\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000518\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c15a74619ddf49cea7b7431316452ddc\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I thank the Chairman for his summary. What he has said, as to what the issue is, is absolutely correct. The Standing Orders are clear that when someone votes, they give the number and the direction of the vote. We heard a series of votes from Hone Harawira that did not do that, but they were interpreted by the interpreter in a way that corrected his breach of the Standing Orders. As a result, the Clerk and the Chair were not aware of the fact that he breached the Standing Orders. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000519\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003EI suppose it is a little naughty to plead guilty to deliberately breaching the Standing Orders, but I wanted to test the system to see whether, in fact, the interpreter was correcting members to bring them within the Standing Orders when they were clearly outside. In my view, it is not the role of the interpreter to do that. If someone is breaching the Standing Orders in M\u0101ori, then the Chair should be made aware of that, just as all of our Chairs would be aware of breaches of the Standing Orders if they were made in English. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000520\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003ETo use Hone Harawira\u2019s example, he cast a vote on behalf of his family. If I did that when you were in the Chair in the House, Mr Speaker, I think it is fair to say that I would get a pretty quick reaction from you. It is my view that it is not the role of the interpreter to tidy up after members who are breaching the Standing Orders.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022 data-id=\u0022325c7848a74c47b593f1e2b519a229c3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000521\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022325c7848a74c47b593f1e2b519a229c3\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I endorse what the Hon Trevor Mallard has said. I think this is an area of the Standing Orders that works very well and very simply. There is a long-established tradition that a whip, or an individual voting on his or her own behalf, says only the number of votes in favour or against; anything else is out of order. That should be so, whether the comment is made in English or is made in M\u0101ori and then translated. It is out of order to add extraneous words. It is a very simply enforced part of the Standing Orders and I suggest that if it is not enforced, we will be allowing the introduction of extraneous words in English, as well as in M\u0101ori, in respect of voting because, of course, the same rule would apply in both situations.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u0022594897037d7d4c05a67d43517092a375\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000522\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022594897037d7d4c05a67d43517092a375\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I am speaking in support of Mr Mallard\u2019s motion to call you back to the House, Mr Speaker. In actual fact, I first raised this issue. I challenged the Chair on whether the role of the interpreter was to interpret what was said or to give what the interpreter thought the Chair wanted to hear. I challenged the Chair on three occasions, and on the third occasion I was forcefully asked by the Chair to sit down. I called you back to the House last night, Mr Speaker, and I realised that it is a pretty tall order to do that. I accepted finally on the third occasion, and I sat down. But I was very pleased that Mr Mallard, who is more experienced than me, had the guts to recall you to the chair\u2014something I did not do myself.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000523\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ba326105f5b14bc39384ff537807902b\u0022\u003EKelvin Davis\u003C/span\u003E: Speaking to the point of order\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022 data-id=\u0022846cefcc9f01472995a2294d171a9e78\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000524\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022846cefcc9f01472995a2294d171a9e78\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: I do not believe I need any further assistance on this matter; I have heard from three members. This is an important issue. The casting of votes in this House is a very, very important issue. I am pleased to make a ruling on the matter. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000525\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003ETo me, the issue is not so much interpretation; it is how members cast their votes. The Speaker\u2019s ruling is very clear on how votes are to be cast. The Chair of the Committee of the whole House and the Hon Trevor Mallard have both referred to Speaker\u2019s ruling 67/7, which points out that in the casting of a party vote \u201CNo other comment at all is allowed.\u201D So to me it is not a matter of interpretation. The interpreters do their best to give us the meaning of what is said in M\u0101ori. The responsibility must be on members to comply with that Speaker\u2019s ruling. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000526\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003EI add to that Speaker\u2019s ruling and make it very clear that if it is breached in the future, then the vote will not be counted. I make that very clear. The responsibility is on members to comply with that Speaker\u2019s ruling. If they make other comments in their vote, then they have not complied with that Speaker\u2019s ruling and it will not be a matter for the interpreter to decide what the members meant; their vote will not be counted. So the responsibility is on all members to comply correctly. Voting is too important to be fooled around with. With that, I declare the House\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u0022bbc4c091a6e744b2a164a0c1b997957e\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000527\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022bbc4c091a6e744b2a164a0c1b997957e\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Speaker. Before you do that, I think we are still left with a problem. The problem is that when a member voting in M\u0101ori does not comply at the moment, the interpreter is not indicating that to the Chair and the Clerk.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022 data-id=\u0022975bc31c854c4d5badf77e311fc03d59\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000528\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ac169d29-4849-42c2-a4a7-f344fd416503\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022975bc31c854c4d5badf77e311fc03d59\u0022\u003EMr SPEAKER\u003C/span\u003E: The member makes a further very good point. I ask the interpreters to make sure that they make clear when interpreting a vote what has been said, so that the Chair is aware if the Speaker\u2019s ruling has been breached. I realise I am taking a very strong position on this issue, but I feel that votes in this House are too important to be played around with. The member is quite right that the Chair must be aware when the Speaker\u2019s ruling is breached, and if the Chair does not understand M\u0101ori sufficiently\u2014and I certainly accept I do not\u2014to judge that, then I expect the interpreters to make it clear in their interpretation. This matter is too important to be played around with. I make it clear to members that if they breach that Speaker\u2019s ruling, then they cannot expect their vote to be counted.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000529\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00221b9fc6ae3a3645608d24a741de657a23\u0022\u003EIn Committee\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000530\u0022\u003EDebate resumed.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000531\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u00226d7135781f2a4e0d9f289d145846308f\u0022\u003EPart 2  Common marine and coastal area (continued)\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022 data-id=\u00224971cdaeb29f49c0b99eabf65b3087ee\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000532\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224971cdaeb29f49c0b99eabf65b3087ee\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA (Labour\u2014Ikaroa-R\u0101whiti):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I want to bring your attention to something. I take umbrage at the assault on our character and how the member Tau Henare impinged on our good character as M\u0101ori when he was chastising us and abusing us across the Chamber. I think that is unbecoming for any member in this House. I feel deeply offended, close to mortally wounded by that sort of onslaught.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022d848b10514a5425a8550ff5acfd5a7e2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000533\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d848b10514a5425a8550ff5acfd5a7e2\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: If the member feels that offence has been taken, then I ask the member to withdraw those comments that were made earlier, and that will end the matter.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000534\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ff719f5d349c43bfa45a7fea0860d7b1\u0022\u003EChris Tremain\u003C/span\u003E: Point of order, Mr Chair.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000535\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002235d36d24dc084b49a78e27d33f8c8673\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I have asked the member at whom this member has taken offence to withdraw and apologise.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022 data-id=\u002294ab9e34c70e4ff39b73ae6264a788ce\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000536\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002294ab9e34c70e4ff39b73ae6264a788ce\u0022\u003EHon TAU HENARE (National):\u003C/span\u003E I withdraw and apologise. I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I want to ask your advice. If a person deliberately mispronounces either my name or my language, then I have every right to take umbrage. I know that some members cannot, and some members can, and that most of the M\u0101ori members can. The member can pronounce it properly, because I have heard him before, and that is what I take umbrage at.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00228c0647a6da664d9fbc504b846185585e\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000537\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228c0647a6da664d9fbc504b846185585e\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I hear what you are saying. There has been some heat in this over the last half hour. The member took offence; the member has apologised. The point has been very well made. Everyone should know to respect other people\u2019s rights in this House. This is a House of Representatives where everyone should be treated fairly and without prejudice in any way. I ask all members\u2014I am not referring to any particular member\u2014to take on board what has been said and respect people\u2019s rights.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022 data-id=\u00225b9e5cc31c944db48d78d8835cd4073e\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000538\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225b9e5cc31c944db48d78d8835cd4073e\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour\u2014Hutt South):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000539\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222d72ef2c9c674a2f9269cc560b914638\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I do not want to enter into further discussion on this.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000540\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f365c6bc86c3483e8e9c1ccdc0118766\u0022\u003EHon TREVOR MALLARD\u003C/span\u003E: And I want to say that at the time I was getting a rapid translation because my knowledge of M\u0101ori numbers does not go to 42. I apologise for the fact that I got it so badly wrong.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00229655c3162bed4024ae229eea66693971\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000541\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229655c3162bed4024ae229eea66693971\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 18(3) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to omit subclause (3). The next amendments in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name to clauses 19 and 20 are ruled out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000542\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 21 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b98b45c1138d42d0aa2ef19794d246cc\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000543\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 62, Noes 59.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022c522183245474b668a5a3aa54a17b08a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000544\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c522183245474b668a5a3aa54a17b08a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 21 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clauses 22, 23, 24, and 25 are out of order. The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 26(1), (2), (2)(a) and (b) are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000545\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 26(2)(b)(i) and (ii) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00221f132b6f479b499dbe9695dc9ed1ceee\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000546\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 5, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022 data-id=\u002204aa9706a6d94e309013dd8e6ec623f9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000547\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002204aa9706a6d94e309013dd8e6ec623f9\u0022\u003EMETIRIA TUREI (Co-Leader\u2014Green):\u003C/span\u003E I seek the leave of the House to make a correction to the Green Party votes on this part, the correction being to change the number from nine votes opposed to eight votes opposed.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000548\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226fe0fdc26d6545ea86a0fb01022cf79b\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Referring to\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000549\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d5bc804d045e4585acf70c489ce246b2\u0022\u003EMETIRIA TUREI\u003C/span\u003E: All votes taken on Part 2.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00222f1b6bf0452143108b0652d1f594bfe6\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000550\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222f1b6bf0452143108b0652d1f594bfe6\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We will correct the vote accordingly. [Interruption] Sorry, I stand corrected. We need leave, because you are changing the vote. Leave is sought to change the votes from nine to eight. Is there any objection to that course of action? There is no objection.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000551\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe next amendment in the Minister\u2019s name is to omit subclause (3) of clause 26, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207. The question is that the amendment be agreed to\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000552\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e4f8b02fd0da428bb1ef656277610ff2\u0022\u003EHon Darren Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I seek some clarification. I see that it has now come to 6 o\u2019clock. Are you proposing to put the question on all the votes because we have now started at that point?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000553\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226b03ead5470d4b0da3e59b20c4cca231\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Yes, because we moved into this stage on a closure motion, and on a closure motion the voting continues regardless of the time.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000554\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c437bda8-4741-4ac5-89ab-b0818e1ab9fa\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e435a3f72e144ecfbeea474d993e7984\u0022\u003EHon Darren Hughes\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. That is absolutely my understanding of it, so you are right to take that course of action. The difficulty is that a number of members will be out of the building over the dinner break, so if whips cast votes, we need to have certainty that that is correct. So it may be useful for you to draw this to the attention of party whips and advise their members not to leave the building. Without wishing in any way to cast aspersions, if members in the complex have not been following proceedings and are leaving, we cannot have confidence\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000555\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c4f541f8256f49f29700c61c2b84d52c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I thank the member.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000556\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00221368ba6c-25be-40f6-a2a0-8f81e1f78b79\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e65486e4e3be4019b036ec9a029d329c\u0022\u003EChris Tremain\u003C/span\u003E: Thank you for that advice. I was well aware that this may be the process, so 10 minutes ago we made it very clear to our members that we would be voting through.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000557\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022efcf811743684d14b8a065ed2ae73445\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I thank the member. I will take the whips\u2019 word that the votes that they cast are accurate votes, and we will leave it at that. I am sure that will satisfy everybody. [Interruption] We are still voting.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000558\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 26(3) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022822e32276f5948a0b1e0fac264122199\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 4; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022522700500733422b9c24d39072f5ba1f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000559\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022522700500733422b9c24d39072f5ba1f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 26(3) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. We now have more amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert, to clause 26(4) and (5).These are ruled out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000560\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 27 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f0f9d0746e7446fcb9bcd890afdd07b0\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 4; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000561\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 216 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 27 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227c17708d808a4c77ba62b951b0dcb307\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000562\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(1)(a) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002225a1b66033ff41668afd5770ec4e8b4b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022d4166ab96b5342dcbe1fa0a77fa2eb7b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000563\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d4166ab96b5342dcbe1fa0a77fa2eb7b\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(1)(b) is out of order. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(1)(c) is out of order. The next\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000564\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00229026a7b61d8e406eb7cf8db2bd1e0800\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I have been following your rulings on amendments that are out of order, and I can understand why some of these have been ruled out of order, but I am rather surprised that the second of Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 28(1)(c) has been ruled out of order, where she proposes that \u201Cand passengers\u201D be omitted and substituted with \u201Cpassengers and other goods or persons\u201D. It seems to me that the addition or the words \u201Cgoods or persons\u201D changes the meaning of that\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000565\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228e2c27fc5d084164b428be89b9f70028\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We are not on that one. I said we are on clause 28(1)(c) of Supplementary Order Paper 214. That is the one you are querying; we have not got to the one that you are mentioning.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000566\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002227314992001f4c0d9a879834b6543cb4\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: There are actually two amendments to clause 28(1)(c), and I am speaking to the second.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000567\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d7e99a6b1fe74b2f8b4e9887f388b297\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I have not put that one yet. In the format in front of us, we are talking about Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 28(1)(c)\u2014to omit \u201Ccrew equipment\u201D and substitute \u201Cequipment and crew\u201D, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214. That is out of order. The one you are referring to is the next one, and we have not got to that one yet.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000568\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fca37388bead42febe876c285a60318b\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I absolutely understand that, so I simply ask that when you rule amendments in or out, you go on to refer to them in a bit more detail, because you earlier ruled out Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 28(1)(b), and she actually had two of them. When you said the amendments to clause 28(1)(b) was being ruled out, effectively you were ruling both of them out together. So when you rule out the amendment to clause 28(1)(c), we at this end of the Chamber do not know whether you are ruling out one or both. What I was seeking to clarify was that it seemed to me that the amendment to clause 28(1)(c) was perfectly reasonable, which you have now agreed it is because you are prepared to put the question on it.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000569\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c9652bfa1a894412a2dff6bc347e0bed\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The previous amendment to clause 28(1)(c) is out of order, and we now move to the one that you are referring to, which is a further amendment to clause 28(1)(c). The question is that Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 28(1)(c) to omit \u201Cand passengers\u201D and substitute \u201Cpassengers, and any other goods or persons\u201D, the amendment to subclause (1)(d) to omit \u201Cfor a convenient time\u201D, and the amendment to subclause (1)(e) to omit \u201Ctemporarily\u201D, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000570\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002249fad1c23c5f4b2b9a084ecaf8d3ba0e\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. Why are you taking the vote on each of those amendments as one question, when previously you have taken the vote on those amendments clause by clause? I realise that the Minister can ask for his amendments to be put as one Supplementary Order Paper, but Hilary Calvert is entitled to have her amendments treated individually.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000571\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022f40db7c1814d4bd08d0fab41010b9a4a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: That is a good question. These are all related, and they are grouped together, and that is why it is being done this way. It is up to the discretion of the Chair, and that is how we have done it.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000572\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fa2db3902df048d5920a98c7533d7b7d\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. In drafting these amendments, we originally put in separate Supplementary Order Papers for each amendment. The Clerk\u2019s Office said to us that that consumed a lot of paper, so we were asked whether we could submit the amendments together on the one Supplementary Order Paper, which we have done. So there are several amendments on one Supplementary Order Paper, and it seems to me that had we not done that, you would have taken the votes separately. I ask that you take the votes separately on the amendments to clause 28(1)(c), (d), and (e).\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000573\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022fe9128e9b5ef4764a8d653ebf21f91cf\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: It does not matter which Supplementary Order Paper the amendments are on. That is irrelevant. I will put the question, which I have just outlined.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000574\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(1)(c) relating to passengers, clause 28(1)(d), and 28(1)(e) to omit \u201Ctemporarily\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022df6bf4bd12254321b33560bb247bf4e9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00229547ad06b8294e4fb1ef12c3c4dfaf70\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000575\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229547ad06b8294e4fb1ef12c3c4dfaf70\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(1)(e) to omit \u201Cwind or weather\u201D and substitute \u201Cweather or winds\u201D is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000576\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229a88f1f68eee426f8e20b3423179fc2d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022128a8e65e78f4bd6bc032141ba8c6bc5\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000577\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022128a8e65e78f4bd6bc032141ba8c6bc5\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 28(3) to (5) are out of order. The next amendments to clause 29, on Supplementary Order Paper 214, are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000578\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit the heading above clause 30 and clauses 30 and 31 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e3d8c2e5e15e4812b381f9aed091c959\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 4; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002278eb1018359440a3b1355b85feefbe8c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000579\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002278eb1018359440a3b1355b85feefbe8c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clauses 30 and 31, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214, are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 32(1) to the definitions of \u201Cdispose of\u201D, \u201Cfreehold interest\u201D, \u201Cinterest\u201D, and \u201Clesser interest\u201D are ruled out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000580\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 32(1) to omit \u201Cof the Crown\u201D from the definition of \u201CMinister\u201D and substitute \u201Cfor Land Information\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022749632082d0649d68351684209e232a8\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022757006916c6d4992ba43eb119958e41c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000581\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022757006916c6d4992ba43eb119958e41c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to the definition of \u201CMinister\u201D in clause 32(1), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214. These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. We have amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 32(1) to the definitions of \u201Creclaimed land\u201D, and \u201Creclaimed land subject to this subpart\u201D. These are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000582\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 32(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e31c985cf9184c47869ed8fefac24c40\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002205d8c0e762c748a4ae7df29124514feb\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000583\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002205d8c0e762c748a4ae7df29124514feb\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clauses 33 and 34 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000584\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 35 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220ee2622de038471590763d6d1eb34bc3\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 4; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00228003d02c3c8346a4aca09d14aa1a9cd4\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000585\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228003d02c3c8346a4aca09d14aa1a9cd4\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 35 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision not to change to the Minister for Land Information. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 35(1) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to omit subclause (1). The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 35(2)(a) is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000586\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 35(2)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002299b3fdb4a1f2408eb95ff65dbcbd0e0a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 4\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 4.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022eb74748e908d4920b627e84493f6b519\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000587\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022eb74748e908d4920b627e84493f6b519\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 36 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision not to change to the Minister for Land Information. The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 36(1) and (2) to omit \u201CMinister may\u201D and substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information may\u201D. These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision not to change to the Minister for Land Information. The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 36(1), (2)(a) and (b), and (3) are out of order. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 37(1) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision not to change to the Minister for Land Information.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000588\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 37(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220d6e471e38f3423081e19c65b771cc40\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000589\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 4, Noes 114.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000590\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 38(3)(a) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022563294edc9374ddb835a634128bbd4fc\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002252e899921cf744e98d2f9c736ba64908\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000591\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002252e899921cf744e98d2f9c736ba64908\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 38(3)(b), and to clause 38(4) to omit \u201Cany person\u201D and substitute \u201Cany person or group\u201D, are out of order. The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 38(3)(c) and (4) to omit \u201Cthe Minister\u201D and substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u201D are out of order as being inconsistent with a decision not to change to the Minister for Land Information. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000592\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 38(5), (6), and (7) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002254a457ed3c7449008a82e1295490a79d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022df1db0270f3344a1ac9c8278519657fc\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000593\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022df1db0270f3344a1ac9c8278519657fc\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 39 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000594\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 39(1), (1)(a), and (b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e564779e27a345c483f1316b211c30b0\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022bb842cf4596944c7a1f329a84e744450\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000595\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022bb842cf4596944c7a1f329a84e744450\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next Hilary Calvert amendments are to clause 39(1)(c), (d), (e), (2), (2)(a), (b), (d), and (g) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214. These are out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000596\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 39(2)(e) and (f) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00225974742d02aa4decaa7852e7ca3d9519\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000597\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 39(2)(h), (i), and (j) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002201a84d67e9e44a58b6755426ee09498a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000598\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 39(3) to omit \u201Cseveral eligible\u201D and substitute \u201Cany number of\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fb44ac7ae19343c49d7098d89c2e8448\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000599\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 39(3) to omit \u201Creclaimed land\u201D and substitute \u201Creclaimed land provided the Minister deems them eligible\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022172e3cb2c4ba498db121adf00639821f\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000600\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 40 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022758bf48346f5450d86df6a402c912ae6\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00222e993076d8cb4cb794559b9387a63a8a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000601\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222e993076d8cb4cb794559b9387a63a8a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 40(1). These amendments are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. The amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 40(1) to substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u2019s\u201D as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 is out of order as it is inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. We now have Hilary Calvert\u2019s remaining amendments to clause 40 to substitute or reorder words. These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision not to change to Minister for Land Information. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 41 is out of order. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 41(1) to substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u201D is out of order as it is inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000602\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 41(1) to omit \u201Cnotify the applicant\u201D and substitute \u201Cnotify the applicant within ten working days\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022383320ba32bf4f169ae874b294cb9482\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000603\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 41 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f901bacbfd86401c998ce3bae6fbe3ed\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022b9e6260563df45e3a6879854de200958\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000604\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b9e6260563df45e3a6879854de200958\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The remaining amendments to clause 41 in the name of Hilary Calvert are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000605\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 42 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022124d17cd079e4ff1b84c5cdf765a4e13\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022d76a2f0d18bd4ac5a03d7aaae91193d2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000606\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d76a2f0d18bd4ac5a03d7aaae91193d2\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We have an amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 42. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000607\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 43(1) to omit \u201C3 months\u201D and substitute \u201C4 months\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022052bf199e0004be4920c9e360a64f1d2\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022f1fbf505d07642a5a85b6c38d011f4f5\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000608\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f1fbf505d07642a5a85b6c38d011f4f5\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The remaining amendments to clause 43 in the name of Hilary Calvert are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. We now have amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading of clause 44 and clause 44(1) to (3). These are out of order. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 44(3), to substitute \u201CMinister of Conservation\u201D, is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000609\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 44(5) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000610\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00224d5f1201b80c4509939f5b54e763a257\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000611\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224d5f1201b80c4509939f5b54e763a257\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We now have an amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 44(6) to substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u201D. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 45(2) to substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u201D. This amendment is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 45(2) to substitute or reorder words that do not alter the meaning of the provision are also out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000612\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 45(2) to omit \u201Cthe Crown\u201D and substitute \u201Cthe Crown within 21 days of being incurred\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000613\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002291c1741e2f8e4e0d8c72eaf15b75e34d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000614\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002291c1741e2f8e4e0d8c72eaf15b75e34d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 45(3) is out of order. We have an amendment to clause 45(3) to substitute \u201Cthe Minister of Conservation\u201D in the name of Hilary Calvert. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000615\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 45(3)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000616\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000617\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 45 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022029067bcdc52451bb84cbc6f88795020\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00224e2e339cb0124b8dae97fd025ad1473f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000618\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224e2e339cb0124b8dae97fd025ad1473f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We now have amendments to clause 45(4). These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision to omit and substitute this subclause.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000619\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 45(5)(c) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000620\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00222703db87d1d24850a6ffa0438471b2f9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000621\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222703db87d1d24850a6ffa0438471b2f9\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 45(5)(d) and (e). They are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000622\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 45(6) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000623\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000624\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 46(1) and (2) and substitute new clause 46(1) and (2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d12f189a2cce48a49e531dc350154adb\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022144f51e061a5437e8b251db7ccf8885c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000625\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022144f51e061a5437e8b251db7ccf8885c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 46(1) and (2) is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. We have amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 46(3) to (5). These are out of order as they are inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000626\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 46(6) to omit \u201Con\u201D and substitute \u201Cas soon as practicable within 5 days of\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000627\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022a1ac65028d004effb0e5d348b681b501\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000628\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a1ac65028d004effb0e5d348b681b501\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We have amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 46(6). These are out of order. The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to the heading of clause 47. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000629\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading of clause 47 to omit \u201Ciwi or hap\u016B, or public\u201D and substitute \u201Chap\u016B, iwi and the public\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000630\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000631\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 47(1) to omit \u201Cnotice\u201D and substitute \u201Cnotice within 20 days\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000632\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00220bcf08add950427197b2e7d4464fea58\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000633\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00220bcf08add950427197b2e7d4464fea58\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We have the remaining amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 47(1). These are out of order. We now move to the amendment to clause 47(2) in the name of Hilary Calvert. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000634\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 47(4) to (7) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002222fd97cf40844059b6d239862646a949\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00221962a24ac9a64b05ac9dc70986ac7e4d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000635\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00221962a24ac9a64b05ac9dc70986ac7e4d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We have an amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 47(4) to (7) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 214. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000636\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment in the name of the Hon David Parker to insert new clauses 47A and 47B be agreed to: \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000637\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003Eto insert the following new clauses after clause 47:\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000638\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E47A\tMatters relating to common marine and coastal area\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000639\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E(1)\tTo avoid doubt, the jurisdiction of the High Court to hear and determine any claim for a protected customary right or customary marine title, that was removed by the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, is restored.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000640\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E(2)\tThis includes, but is not limited to, the restoration of the jurisdiction to determine the appropriate threshold for the establishment of a protected customary right or customary marine title.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000641\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E47B\tCustomary interest inalienable\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000642\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\tNo person has the capacity to alienate any protected customary right or customary marine title, or to dispose by will of any such interest.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228ea3cd08be534909be9651f8e58c282d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independent: Carter C. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 63\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1; Independent: Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000643\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the remaining amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to Part 2 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f7e50bb28bd64a57b38653d611ef2cb9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022860ff64f3e8b457a98bc0aaa42a2ad7a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That Part 2 as amended be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EPart 2 as amended agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000644\u0022\u003ESitting suspended from 6.56 p.m. to 7.30 p.m.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u002209a100912bd5420b994a2909a7e9dd34\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000645\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002209a100912bd5420b994a2909a7e9dd34\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Before we commence the debate on Part 3, two votes need to be amended because they were incorrectly announced. I will just run through those now. The vote on the question to amend the definition of \u201Cmana tuku iho\u201D in clause 7 was announced as Ayes 47 and Noes 73. The correct result was Ayes 5 and Noes 115. The vote on the question to omit the words from the definition of \u201Cplanning document\u201D in clause 7 was announced as Ayes 47 and Noes 73. The correct result is Ayes 5 and Noes 115. The record in each case will be corrected. No outcome was changed. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000646\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsSubproceedingHeading\u0022 id=\u0022ebaa60c118c741fb81f0f0771551735f\u0022\u003EPart 3  Customary interests\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002241146229-4d11-415b-a4ac-f4e2b923e95d\u0022 data-id=\u00228dbb316f6cd6457d98bbdb79a2fa1114\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000647\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002241146229-4d11-415b-a4ac-f4e2b923e95d\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228dbb316f6cd6457d98bbdb79a2fa1114\u0022\u003EHon CHRISTOPHER FINLAYSON (Attorney-General):\u003C/span\u003E Part 3 is a very important part of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. It sets up the legal rights and interests that give expression to the customary interests in the common marine and coastal area. It has three subparts. Subpart 1 provides for affected iwi and hap\u016B to participate in certain conservation processes, subpart 2 sets out the test for, and rights associated with, protected customary rights, and subpart 3 sets out the test for, and rights associated with, customary marine title. I will be very interested in the debate on subpart 3, because those are very important questions. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000648\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002241146229-4d11-415b-a4ac-f4e2b923e95d\u0022\u003EIt seems to me that, putting aside all the noise and sometimes the imbecility, this legislation really boils down to a couple of key issues. The first\u2014and I think we are all agreed\u2014is whether the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 should be repealed. The answer unanimously around this Chamber seems to be yes. The next issue is whether iwi, hap\u016B, and wh\u0101nau should have the right to go to court. The answer overwhelmingly is yes. So the debate really is all about whether the tests for determining customary title should be codified or should be simply left to the courts. With the greatest of respect to Mr Parker, who I think has made a very positive, substantive contribution to this debate, and I mean that genuinely, he and I are apart on that issue. I firmly believe, as I think Dr Cullen did, that statutory codification of the common law tests does need to be retained. I really think that to wait upon protracted legal arguments while we spend years in the courts determining these issues defeats the purpose of what many are seeking\u2014namely, certainty and equity. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000649\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002241146229-4d11-415b-a4ac-f4e2b923e95d\u0022\u003EThere are a couple of other points that Dr Cullen made in his excellent submission on behalf of the Labour Party to the Boast, Durie, and O\u2019Regan panel. One point was that provisions should be made for the recognition of customary transfer for some period after 1840, and I think of iwi like Ng\u0101ti Porou ki Hauraki. He also said\u2014and this leads on to the next point\u2014that some thought needs to be given to just what powers the possession of customary title would involve. He said in his submission that the current provisions relating to a foreshore and seabed reserve form a useful starting point, but that consideration would need to be given to the relationship to other legislation such as the Resource Management Act, and he then pointed everyone in the direction of the Ng\u0101ti Porou agreement. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000650\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002241146229-4d11-415b-a4ac-f4e2b923e95d\u0022\u003ESo that is the second big issue that the Committee needs to determine tonight. Do we leave it to the courts to determine not only the tests for customary title but also what customary title involves, or do we go with the formulation in the bill about the rights conferred by customary title? I am in the camp that says we need to set out what customary marine title involves. The Court of Appeal on the Ng\u0101ti Apa case was not exactly sure. It said the burden could extend from usufructuary rights to exclusive ownership equivalent to fee simple. There is a big range there, so the issue really becomes whether the rights that are set out in clause 64 are appropriate, or whether there should be something more or something less. In spite of all the noise, I think those are the key issues, and I think it would be in the interests of everyone to have a good, solid, and focused debate on those points.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022 data-id=\u00225e64a55360a24011bb515353b8e212e3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000651\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225e64a55360a24011bb515353b8e212e3\u0022\u003EHon SHANE JONES (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E Now that we have returned from a break and had some kai and whakak\u012B te k\u014Dp\u016B, I imagine Mr Tau Henare will resume his more restful self. I want to take up the invitation of the Minister who was in the chair, the Attorney-General, and go straight to clause 64, and indeed the attendant explanatory clauses 65 to 91 in the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. This debate was always going to turn on how one conceives the extent, the character, and the depth of any residual M\u0101ori proprietorial interest in the seabed and foreshore.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000652\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EThis debate was rehearsed in the late 1980s, because there used to be a similar provision in the Fisheries Act\u2014section 88(2). It was a savings clause that came from earlier bouts of legislation that gave status to M\u0101ori fishing interests. The prevailing view of the Crown at that stage was that these interests, to the extent that they subsisted into the 20th century, were to be found in discrete areas\u2014rocks and reefs. But the Waitangi Tribunal, the High Court, and inevitably our greatest jurist of all, Lord Cooke, found that these rights were dynamic, and that as the circumstances of the people changed, so the character of their rights changed. They were not to be locked or fossilised into the type of economy or the type of society that existed in 1840. M\u0101ori asked why it was reasonable for the Crown\u2019s entitlements in the natural estate to be evolutionary and dynamic but the entitlements of M\u0101ori as the Treaty partner continued to exist as if it is still 1840. That has been one of the deep, unresolved issues over the last 25 to 30 years of the Treaty-based renaissance.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000653\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EThat is what the M\u0101ori Land Court was faced with in the papatipu investigations. In those investigations the M\u0101ori Land Court tried to determine, firstly, how powerful the rights were that a given community had in the landscape. It looked at such things as trapping, occupation, fishing, harvesting of trees, and issues to do with general reliance on that part of the economy. From there it framed what would be the nature and extent of, largely speaking, a M\u0101ori collective property right in their natural environment. This is in many respects what we are now asking the High Court to do. Last night I asked whether the High Court will have the necessary expertise in terms of additional resources and rules. I was assured by the Minister, as I recall, that that work is under way, it has already happened, etc.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000654\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EHone Harawira made a very useful and accurate point about the extent to which the actual rights of the successful applicants will be far short when we consider that if there is a residual proprietorial interest in a given part of the takutai moana, much of it has been hollowed out through accommodated activities, and the override entitlement associated with accommodated activities. I think a lot of applicants will find that what they have is a very poor and, dare I say it, pale imitation of what they believe they are getting back, because much has been carved out in order to satisfy other stakeholders. There lies a deep problem if we use exclusively a political process, when people probably need to have these things teased out in court if they do not think the political process is the solution. The political process will be dominated from time to time by colleagues of ours from the ACT Party, and in other times by far more reasonable characters, who will inevitably come from this side of the Chamber. The meaning of \u201Cdeemed accommodated activities\u201D and accommodated associations, etc., will crimp those solutions.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000655\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EThe Minister is asking us whether the rights we are discussing are static or dynamic. If the society that modern M\u0101ori find themselves in has nothing to do with what subsisted in the 1840s or 1850s, how do we give expression to those rights? What institutional forms should they take? Can a codified approach, which in my view is really designed to prevent wild and unmanageable litigation, give a better result than if we leave the issue ill-defined and invite the Waitangi Tribunal to be involved\u2014no doubt having been unfortunately dragooned into action in some manner or form\u2014or if we take it back to the courts? When we use the expression \u201Cthe threshold test\u201D, that is really what we are talking about. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000656\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EThe answer, unfortunately, has already been given in this bill. There may be a narrow range of minerals where there is perceived to be a prevailing M\u0101ori ownership interest, but other minerals have been carved out. The difficulty and the irreconcilable tension is that we may give some tangata whenua group a right and a title, and they may have the ability to block someone wanting to engage in economic development activities in their area, but at the end of the day the Minister of Conservation will have the overarching yea or nay power. That is why the M\u0101ori Party, although it agrees this bill is an improvement, has overlooked the fact that only minor and modest authority is attached to those tangata whenua groups. At the end of the day the power to allocate, to administer, and, indeed, to even regulate the takutai moana titleholders will rest with the Minister of Conservation. Is that necessarily a bad thing? Well, someone has to be in power and in control, but to suggest that it will provide a basis to restore the rights that romantically exist in the minds of our friends from the M\u0101ori Party is wrong. It is also quite misleading to continue to leave our people with the impression that they will be satisfied by the passage of this legislation.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000657\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EI will go to clause 61. All of this will be a debate about what is justiciable: what factors a judge or Minister can take into account when we form the final shape, depth, and value of those rights. Applicants and statutory decision-makers will be able to take into account whether there has been a non-commercial fishing interest, and I would caution anyone against reopening that debate, and I hope this legislation goes nowhere near to doing that. A lot of the customary fishing rights depend on access, and it will not so much be about whether applicant groups have enjoyed unfettered access to the land abutting the takutai moana, but whether any of their members have also had that right. As day follows night, we can rest assured that there is a vast difference between the applicant tangata whenua group and its members. Without a doubt, a number of those members will have certain land rights, but those organisations and members will not be congruent with the group that is making the application. Many of those groups will be political in character; they will not be specific or identifiable landowners. Indeed they will create\u2014through, I think, unwise drafting\u2014situations not unlike the current Maungatautari dispute, which involves private individual M\u0101ori landowners and individuals in a hap\u016B claimant group. The drafting is unwise\u2014the Minister has gone now, and we are unlikely to learn anything from the current Minister in the chair, the Minister of Police.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022 data-id=\u0022603e2f8380264c1593871967a4ccebca\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000658\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022603e2f8380264c1593871967a4ccebca\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I congratulate the prior speaker, Shane Jones, because I thought that was a very erudite contribution to the debate as to the difficulty Parliament faces in respect of these issues. I want to say why I think this Parliament is missing an opportunity to properly settle this issue. The Labour Party, through the Hon Dr Michael Cullen, made a submission to the ministerial review panel that said, amongst other things, that we should settle this issue, and that an appropriate settlement could include codification of the common law tests. At the time a very good opinion piece by John Armstrong was published in the New Zealand Herald. He said this was a difficult issue for New Zealand, and that Parliament had had one crack at it. At that time we had the National Party being, I would say, irresponsible, rarking up race relations and making it an almost impossible issue to settle properly at the time. We also had some pretty intemperate comments at the other end of the spectrum. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000659\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EBy the time of the ministerial review panel, we had at least the major parties in Parliament trying to find a way forward that was fair to minority interests, and that the country could live with. On that basis Labour said we supported statutory codification of the tests. At the time John Armstrong made the point that if we looked at the spectrum of opinion when the Foreshore and Seabed Act was passed we had the M\u0101ori Party, or the precursors to the M\u0101ori Party, saying the legislation was far too tough, Labour, closer to the M\u0101ori Party precursors than to the National, in the middle, and we had National at another extreme of the debate, saying that the legislation was far too permissive in terms of its recognition of unextinguished customary rights. John Armstrong made the point that since that time National had moved very substantially. It had moved past its position at the time of the Foreshore and Seabed Act to say it wanted something that restored to M\u0101ori, for example, the right to go to court. National moved to that position, and we moved to that point too, and we were willing to move a bit further than National was willing to move. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000660\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EAll that it would have taken to settle this issue was an agreement from the M\u0101ori Party to move from where it sat to where National had got to, in respect of agreeing that the solution proposed by National was a fair settlement of the issue. If we had that, it may well be that this Parliament would now be expressing unity on this issue, and that would be good for our country. Unfortunately, I have to say that the M\u0101ori Party and National have failed in their duty to the country. They said they would settle this issue. Rather than John Key ringing up the M\u0101ori Party and saying \u201CHey, this is the deal, can you live with it?\u201D, he has not done that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000661\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EI do not want to be paternalistic or maternalistic towards the M\u0101ori Party, but rather than the M\u0101ori Party offering up to say it accepted that this was a fair settlement of the issue, the M\u0101ori Party said the opposite. It said this was a first step. It said that at the level of the Hon Tariana Turia, and the Hon Dr Pita Sharples said the same thing. Those are the co-leaders of the M\u0101ori Party, and their senior whip said exactly the same thing. He also said this bill was not a settlement. On that basis, National asked us to accept the pretence that this was a settlement, and that was where we bailed, because we said we would not put up with that fiction\u2014because it is a fiction, for the reasons I have outlined. On that basis we got to the point where we said Parliament had had two cracks at fixing it, and Parliament could not fix it. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000662\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EIt is obvious Parliament cannot fix what is the appropriate threshold test to the satisfaction of the range of interests involved. As a consequence, we say Part 3, which has the threshold test in it, is wrong. We say we ought not to be pretending that this settles it, and we ought to let these issues play out over time through the courts. I heard the Minister in charge of the bill, the Hon Christopher Finlayson, say that would be a bad thing, because it would take time and it would create uncertainty. The first thing I would say is that presumes this legislation creates certainty. How can that be, when the M\u0101ori Party and various other sectors in society for different reasons are saying it does not settle the issue? We are kidding ourselves if we think that by saying it is settled, it will be. The reality is that it is not. So that is the first problem with the Attorney-General\u2019s argument.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000663\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EThe second problem with his arguments in favour of codification, given where we have got to, relates to the suggestion that somehow this will be better because it is simpler and therefore more cost-effective. This legislation enables agreements to be progressed through legislation in Parliament. According to the Parliamentary Library\u2014I asked it to give me some advice on this\u2014the average cost of a piece of legislation in 2010, including the full costs of running Parliament, was $2.8 million per piece of legislation. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000664\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022330934f2e928452c8a8dcd96fd318ab6\u0022\u003EHon Member\u003C/span\u003E: Can you say that again.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000665\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00225ed92f8f294d4c40ae5fed4276ab4b5e\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER\u003C/span\u003E: It was $2.8 million per piece of legislation. I am not saying that that is the full cost of every piece of legislation, because the marginal cost of legislation is probably not $2.8 million, but I tell members that it is a lot, lot more than the cost of a court action. A court action for people to explore their customary interests and for the court to determine them does not cost millions of dollars; a piece of legislation does. So the idea that through this new process the Government is introducing we will have a more cost-effective approach is just wrong. It would be far more cost-effective for taxpayers to fund appropriate contributions to legal aid than it would be to proceed by way of Acts of Parliament in respect of these agreements that are going to come forward. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000666\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EThe codification of these tests is highly problematic. A lot of people in New Zealand will be left dissatisfied. People such as Hone Harawira and the M\u0101ori Party say this codification of the test acts as a confiscation of rights. We can never win that argument in this Parliament, because the people who believe that never had the ability to test that as we are removing from the jurisdiction of the court their ability to test it. Through codification we are putting the issue as to what should be the proper threshold test beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and therefore the sense of injustice from some of the M\u0101ori Party\u2019s supporters will always be there. Conversely, the people at the other end of the debate who say the test is far too lax\u2014and they might be right\u2014are also prevented from having their day in court to argue what they think. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000667\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EHaving had two attempts in this Parliament to settle this matter we have not achieved it, and it is time to acknowledge that reality. There is an amendment in my name to that effect. Let us put this back to the courts. The M\u0101ori Party could vote for that amendment tonight and that would be the outcome. That is what they say they wanted originally. The Greens support that, Progressive supports that, the ACT Party supports that, and I think that Hone Harawira would even support it going back to the courts. All it takes is for the M\u0101ori Party or, indeed, a few people in National\u2014and they are under pressure\u2014if they were not whipped, to vote in favour of that amendment and we could have that solution in this Chamber tonight.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000668\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EWe could have this issue settled fairly, setting out a process for everyone to have their day in court. The framework would be settled, taxpayers would be better off, M\u0101ori interests would feel justly treated, and other interests who feel aggrieved by this legislation would feel justly treated. We tested that at the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee across a wide range of submitters, and although it is true that it was not universally accepted, the vast majority of people thought it was the way forward. That is why Labour does not support this most crucial part of the bill, Part 3, in its current form. That is why we have an amendment to that effect.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022 data-id=\u0022368712cd0fd34806bda2289a45f40ee2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000669\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022368712cd0fd34806bda2289a45f40ee2\u0022\u003ECATHERINE DELAHUNTY (Green):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koutou te Whare. The Green Party has a strong interest in both the detail and the intent of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill in all parts, but especially in Part 3. We agree with a number of comments about the right to go to court, although having spent a bit of time in some courts as a layperson, I have a very unromantic view of a court where the tests are too difficult for people to pass.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000670\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EOf all the Green MPs, Metiria Turei has lived the issue through the parliamentary process in depth and detail. However, if we do not obsess over the detail but actually look at the intent of the bill, we realise that all of us in this country have a contribution to make. People out there are emailing me and using Facebook all day saying: \u201CWhat on earth are these people in Parliament talking about? Can you please make this comprehensible.\u201D People do not understand why the debate has become so esoteric. I will attempt to be slightly less esoteric, which should be quite easy for me as a non-lawyer.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000671\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EPart 3 is focused on the rights and tests, and of particular importance is the definition of \u201Ccustomary marine title\u201D. This does not really sound like a tikanga-based definition, but it definitely has a strong marine flavour and many fishhooks. One of the most fundamental issues is the test for a marine customary title. Clause 60(1)(b) requires tangata whenua to show that they have \u201Cexclusively used and occupied the specified area from 1840 to the present day without substantial interruption.\u201D It is necessary to ask who benefits from the inclusion of that provision. In my limited experience, a limited list of hap\u016B\u2014perhaps Te Tair\u0101whiti\u2014may be able to pass this test, but I ask who else and where. And even within that rohe, where I was privileged to live for 8 years, I can think of numerous examples where mana whenua hap\u016B simply could not pass that test, as a result of colonisation.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000672\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EI want to cite two examples where the mana whenua hap\u016B who live on the coast cannot have confidence in this test. Would the people of Rongomaiwahine and \u014Cpoutama who lost by various means their access to the foreshore to the local authority, which then sold it to a camping ground that then sold it to a developer to make a wealthy subdivision right on the foreshore, be able to claim unbroken title without substantial interruption? They probably would not. Nevertheless it is they who maintain passionate kaitiakitanga and responsibility for that part of the coast, and welcome people to come as manuhiri and have holidays there. But it is they who were marginalised from the decision making, continue to be marginalised, and may not be able to pass the test.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000673\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EThen there is the interesting saga of Te Kur\u012B o Paoa\u2014Young Nicks Head\u2014and the customary relationships of mana whenua to that piece of coast where tangata whenua first saw Young Nick on the bowsprit of the Endeavour. Ng\u0101i Tamanuhiri had uninterrupted access until the land was alienated and became a farm owned by a local family, who then put the maunga on the market. The marine area around Te Kur\u012B o Paoa was put at a price that the tangata whenua could not afford to buy back. So Te Kur\u012B o Paoa was bought by an American stockbroker called John Griffin, who offered the family a lot more money. The possibility of regaining land title to their sacred maunga and their customary marine coastal rights was lost. If the stockbroker is in the mood or chooses to invite them, they may have access to their coastal and marine area. That is not a customary right and that is not an exercise in justice. That ancestral relationship is substantially interrupted, and therefore I ask how they will pass the test. The right in both cases to be the decision maker is seriously undermined by clause 60(1)(b).\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000674\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EIt may be, however, that proving that a protected customary right exists is a lot simpler than that, because, for example, gathering kai moana or launching waka are activities that can be maintained without substantial interruption, despite colonisation. So some people in the coastal area can go and gather kai even though they have lost access, but they cannot necessarily exercise any decision making over their ancestral whenua or over the foreshore and seabed in their area.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000675\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00220ee528dc-7870-4553-95ed-5ec0cab60f07\u0022\u003EIt is the Green Party\u2019s view that this test has been deliberately set up to create a failure, even in places like Te Tai R\u0101whiti, where some believe they will have no problem in proving their situation. The Green Party believes that the tests in the legislation have been chosen by the Government because they meet the Government\u2019s political objective to make the process as difficult as possible for hap\u016B and iwi.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022 data-id=\u0022c92d399a78964fd08ed7b537b92d5b34\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000676\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c92d399a78964fd08ed7b537b92d5b34\u0022\u003EHon MARYAN STREET (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I rise to speak to Part 3 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, and I recognise that I do not have the legal training that the Minister, Chris Finlayson, who is sponsoring the bill has. So I confess readily, as a humble arts graduate, that I need to go back to principles that simply make sense to me. I find Part 3 of this legislation quite challenging, and I think that is because it is genuinely difficult. I do not think I am as illiterate as other members may class me as being, but it seems to me that if we go back to what this legislation is about, we get to the heart of it in Part 3.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000677\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003EIn Subpart 1 we have the participation and conservation processes in the common marine and coastal area, in Subpart 2 we have protected customary rights, and in Subpart 3 we have the customary marine title. I will go back to basics and say right from the start of the debate on this part that Labour\u2019s basic position has been, firstly, to guarantee public access; secondly, to recognise M\u0101ori customary rights; and, thirdly, to allow M\u0101ori to take all aspects of their claims to the court. Those three things are simple principles that I can understand and I can describe to other people. That is always the test for me\u2014whether I can describe what the legislation means to other people. I have worked quite hard at this.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000678\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003EI will start at perhaps the most contentious bit, and that is the customary marine title in Subpart 3. Some of the earlier subparts of this section of the legislation are reasonably OK. For example, there is now widespread agreement that rights of free public access to the foreshore and seabed and so on are not at legal risk, and the prevention of the alienation of customary interest is widely supported. Therefore, I will not traverse those things so much. But when we get to this bit in Subpart 3, then suddenly I begin to get suspicious, because what we have here is the meaning of customary marine title and an attempt at codification of it, to which the Minister referred in his opening remarks. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000679\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003EMy experience of codification in past lives has been that it is an extremely complex, difficult, and exhausting process. The codification of a right often requires a level of detail that is needed to address every issue that one can reasonably expect to arise where a right might be applied or might be sought to be applied. Codification is a very complicated process, but this effort in Subpart 3 puzzles me most. Our position is that we are happy to lay out general principles and have the court determine, on application, how those principles might be applied in determining whether customary marine title exists. Two things are important in clause 60(1) in Subpart 3. It states: \u201CCustomary marine title exists in a particular part of the common marine and coastal area if the applicant group\u2014(a) holds the specified area in accordance with tikanga; and (b) has exclusively used and occupied the specified area from 1840 to the present day without substantial interruption.\u201D That is problematic for many iwi. It is extremely difficult for iwi to prove, and it is extremely difficult for\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000680\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022df788c48-b9be-42fd-b8f2-76629a5572b8\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e0cc520bc3aa4309a6f31c0b0eb6c13c\u0022\u003EHon Dr Wayne Mapp\u003C/span\u003E: No, it\u2019s not difficult at all. It\u2019s one of the easiest things to prove.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000681\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a1bbc2b584e449b7889e2512c627b1d4\u0022\u003EHon MARYAN STREET\u003C/span\u003E: Well, the ones I have talked to who are represented by the Iwi Leadership Group, which is most of them, said that this threshold is unfair. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000682\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003EThe issue is that the M\u0101ori Party was founded on the basis of what it considered to be flawed legislation passed by our Government in the white heat of the racist opposition that the National Party had been drumming up over a number of years, and Don Brash owns his part\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000683\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002213bc6ac3294f4e9393648b6229c06c10\u0022\u003EHon Members\u003C/span\u003E: Point of order\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000684\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a4d59001f7184e4bb866cebf34678c02\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: I think I know what the point of order is, and I have just been reflecting on the way in which the member used a certain word. The test is whether the Committee itself is offended by a word like this one. With regard to the context in which the member used it, I know that she did not personalise it, but it does bring offence to the Committee. I ask the member to desist.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000685\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221da40cc55a984de2bc25f76b99d81f01\u0022\u003EHon MARYAN STREET\u003C/span\u003E: Thank you, Mr Chairperson; I will desist. In the white heat that the National Party generated at the time of the passage of our legislation, the M\u0101ori Party said we were taking away the right to go to court. The Labour Party has said since then\u2014and I said it yesterday in this very debate\u2014that we got that wrong, and we have apologised for that. Now this codification part of this legislation is trying to do much the same thing. I go back to simple principles. The concern that we in the Labour Party have is that this provision appears opaque\u2014it is not transparent. I would rather provide guidelines and principles in legislation in this House and have the courts\u2014people whom the Minister in the chair, the Hon Judith Collins, trained with in her previous occupation, and who are now judges\u2014look at this and see how to apply it. Let us build up some case law and practice in this area.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000686\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227df975cd-93d2-4f55-9bc5-d2790e28e043\u0022\u003EThe independence of the judiciary is extremely important to our democracy, and for the life of me I cannot understand why the M\u0101ori Party finds this bill fit to support when it continues the denial of access to the courts that provoked the establishment of that party. So this is a real puzzle to me: that the M\u0101ori Party, on whose votes this legislation depends, are violently opposed to a restriction of access to the courts in 2004, yet come 2011, when this Parliament is having a second go at addressing this issue in the interests of all New Zealanders, it thinks it is now OK to have something codified in legislation and not able to be taken to the courts for testing. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u002262574ba0d978466e9aea3b407ff0ae86\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000687\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002262574ba0d978466e9aea3b407ff0ae86\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Deputy Leader\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I will just comment on what Maryan Street had to say. She summarised part of the basis of the ACT Party\u2019s objection to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. We believe that iwi and hap\u016B should have access to courts. We do not believe that the law should be codified in the way that it has been, which denies the right of iwi and hap\u016B to go to court and to fight for their common law rights. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000688\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EThis is a debate on Part 3 of the bill. I will focus in particular on the clauses relating to customary title, which have been identified by the Hon Christopher Finlayson: clauses 60, 61, and 64. I will refer also to mana tuku iho. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000689\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EBefore I do that I feel as though I need to respond to some of the comments that Hone Harawira made earlier this afternoon. I had hoped to make this contribution during the debate on the last part, before the vote was taken, but I was prevented from doing that. But the points I will make are still just as relevant. The ACT Party totally agrees with Hone Harawira that this bill needs to be opposed, and opposed at every step. We will be fighting to the bitter end. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000690\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EOne of the points we make is in respect of what Hone said this afternoon: that this was a confiscation of M\u0101ori rights. I think Hone and some of his supporters are of the view that iwi and hap\u016B have customary title to, have ownership of, the entire seabed and foreshore out to the end of the territorial sea, to the extent of the 12-mile limit. It is important to come back to the decision in the Ng\u0101ti Apa case. Once again, the Attorney-General quoted that case this afternoon. The view that M\u0101ori own the seabed and foreshore is a common view amongst some M\u0101ori. It is interesting that a h\u012Bkoi is marching to Wellington as we speak. But I suggest that the reason the h\u012Bkoi has been formed and is marching on this occasion is a lot different from what it was in 2004. In 2004 the h\u012Bkoi was marching for access to the courts; it was acting for access to the courts and for justice. My colleague the Hon Rodney Hide joined that h\u012Bkoi when it arrived in Wellington. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000691\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EI will comment on some of the observations made by Dame Sian Elias, the Chief Justice. She said in the Ng\u0101ti Apa case: \u201CThis appeal deals only with the initial question of whether the Maori Land Court can enter into the substantive inquiry.\u201D The appeal dealt only with whether the issue could legally go before the M\u0101ori Land Court. It did not deal with whether iwi and hap\u016B have customary title. She went on to say: \u201CThe significance of the determinations this Court is asked to make should not be exaggerated. The outcome of the appeal cannot establish that there is Maori customary land below the high water mark.\u201D There you have it. She said that the outcome of the Ng\u0101ti Apa case cannot be exaggerated. It did not establish that there was M\u0101ori customary land below the high-water mark. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000692\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EEver since that judgment, despite her observations that it did not determine whether there was M\u0101ori customary land below the high-water mark, a group of New Zealanders has believed that is the case\u2014that M\u0101ori own the seabed and foreshore. In this case we have seen the National Government take fright, as the Labour Government took fright in 2004 with the passing of the Foreshore and Seabed Act. Both National and Labour have sought to restrict the rights of iwi and hap\u016B to go to court to claim their customary title, I guess under a belief that they would win large amounts of New Zealand. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000693\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EIn this case they have set a codification\u2014a series of tests\u2014that the Attorney-General says will lead to certainty and to equity. I will explain in my call why that will do exactly the opposite, why it will not lead to certainty, and why it will not lead to equity. Interestingly, Dame Sian Elias goes on to say: \u201CNor will the appeal resolve questions of the nature of any property interest in land (whether it approximates a fee simple interest or whether it is lesser property).\u201D \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000694\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EI will focus most of my remaining time on the issue of customary title, but before doing so I will comment very briefly on the concept of mana tuku iho. Essentially, mana tuku iho creates a universal right of consultation. Pita Sharples and Tariana Turia wrote in the New Zealand Herald last week: \u201CThe new bill acknowledges that ALL coastal iwi have connections to the coast. Their mana tuku iho (inherent authority) entitles them to protect their w\u0101hi tapu and to be consulted on conservation and resource-management issues.\u201D One of the reasons this bill is a racist bill is that that right is given only to coastal iwi. What about other people living on the coast who are not iwi? What about non-M\u0101ori New Zealanders who also live on the coast, whose families have lived on the coast for over 100 years? They do not have the same rights as provided for in this bill. If that is not a racist provision, I do not know what is. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000695\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EThe issue comes to the tests of marine title and the rights that derive from it. National has perpetuated the myth, the fiction, that only very small areas of New Zealand will be opened up to claims of customary title. Its members have said in their publications, for example, that \u201CThe test\u201D\u2014for customary title\u2014\u201Crequires continuous, exclusive use and occupation of an area since 1840. As you can imagine, that is not an easy test to meet.\u201D Well, it is not an easy test to meet, but that is not actually the test. One does not actually have to prove continuous and exclusive occupation; one has to prove exclusive and continuous occupation without substantial interruption. What is the effect of that proviso? We do not know, Christopher Finlayson does not know, and the Court of Appeal does not know. To suggest that this bill will lead to certainty is a load of hogwash. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000696\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EIf when I look at the Minister\u2019s Supplementary Order Paper 207, I see the addition of new clause 61(2A), which states: \u201CThe use at any time, by persons who are not members of an applicant group, of a specified area of the common marine and coastal area for fishing or navigation does not, of itself, preclude the applicant group from establishing the existence of customary marine title.\u201D So iwi can make a claim for customary title, iwi can say they have occupied the land exclusively, but the fact that other people come and fish, boat, and navigate through that land does not preclude iwi from making a claim, it does not preclude the court from awarding iwi customary title, and it does not preclude the Government from entering into an agreement to grant customary title. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000697\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003ETo perpetuate the fiction, the myth, and to mislead New Zealanders that the right to apply for customary title will apply to only a very small part of New Zealand is, I think, deceptive in the extreme. I think National is relying on the fact that New Zealanders are not taking an interest in this issue, but I think in time that they will, and they will take an interest in ever-bigger numbers. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000698\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003EI turn to clause 64, and to the benefits that flow from being granted customary marine title. The first thing we know is that with a grant of customary marine title comes the ownership of minerals, other than those deemed to be owned by the Crown under the Crown Minerals Act: basically, all minerals and resources other than oil, gold, silver, and natural resources. That right is granted specifically in this bill out to the 12-mile limit\u2014out to the limits of the territorial sea. Well, in 1840 the limit of the territorial sea was recognised as being 3 miles, so in this bill we are setting ourselves up to transfer ownership of resources from all New Zealanders to a small, select group of iwi who can meet these tests. The Government suggests that that is equity, but how does that protect the rights of all New Zealanders? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000699\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003ELet me go on. There is also the right to protect w\u0101hi tapu. I would be the first to recognise M\u0101ori custom; I would be the first to recognise sacred areas. But New Zealanders probably do not appreciate that when a claim is lodged for customary title, areas can be designated as w\u0101hi tapu. They are designated as sacred, and that gives iwi the right, if customary title is subsequently granted, to say that is a sacred area and they do not want other New Zealanders to enter. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022 data-id=\u00225df7b5863c5f41fab355aed0f0446d99\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000700\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225df7b5863c5f41fab355aed0f0446d99\u0022\u003EKELVIN DAVIS (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E I will start off by disagreeing with my colleague Nanaia Mahuta, when she said the M\u0101ori Party had trouble in justifying the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. That party does not have trouble in justifying this bill; it is absolutely proud of it. In the h\u012Bkoi of 2004 people marched against the Foreshore and Seabed Bill. But they are not being led on a h\u012Bkoi with this bill; they are being led down the garden path, because the legislation that they have ended up with is little different from the 2004 Act. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000701\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EI take issue with what the Hon John Boscawen said\u2014that in 1840 the territorial limit was 3 miles out to sea. Tau Henare, for all of his bluster, raised a good point in his interjection when he asked who had set that 3-mile limit. It certainly was not M\u0101ori. We are talking here about M\u0101ori customary rights and so on, but the Hon John Boscawen is referring to a totally European concept, and in 1840 M\u0101ori were in charge of the country. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000702\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EMoving on to the bill, and to the definitions there of hap\u016B, I tell the Committee that the bill originally stated in clause 49(2) that \u201Chap\u016B means a hap\u016B listed in the constitutional documents of an iwi or as advised to the Director-General by the iwi\u201D. In the select committee process in the Maori Affairs Committee a number of hap\u016B were concerned about that, because their hap\u016B were not necessarily listed in the constitutional documents of the iwi. The M\u0101hurehure tribe in Waim\u0101 in the Hokianga were a tribe who were concerned that they might be missed out. Instead, the clause has now been changed on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson\u2014and I believe rightly so. Clause 49(1) on that Supplementary Order Paper states: \u201CIn this section and sections 50 to 52, affected iwi, hap\u016B, or wh\u0101nau means iwi, hap\u016B, or wh\u0101nau that exercise kaitiakitanga in a part of the common marine and coastal area where a conservation process is being considered.\u201D M\u0101hurehure are an inland iwi, but the Waim\u0101 River goes right through to the Hokianga Harbour, and I tell the Committee that they will be glad now that they will be included, most definitely, in this provision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000703\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EClause 53 describes the meaning of \u201Cprotected customary rights\u201D, and we have heard already that under subclause (1) \u201CA protected customary right is a right that\u2014(a) has been exercised since 1840; and (b) continues to be exercised in a particular part of the common marine and coastal area in accordance with tikanga by the applicant group, whether it continues to be exercised in exactly the same or a similar way, or evolves over time;\u201D. The bill does not actually give any examples of what a customary right may be, other than the collection of h\u0101ngi stones, I believe, and the launching of waka. From what I can read, there is no real description of what such a right might be, and I think that just tells us, as M\u0101ori, that we have the right to go and do what we have always done\u2014for example, gather pipis, go diving for kinas, p\u0101uas, scallops, or whatever else. To me, this whole part about protected customary rights really just says M\u0101ori have the right to go and do what we have always done on the foreshore and seabed, anyway. To me, it is almost extraneous to the whole issue. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000704\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EThen we move on to clause 58, \u201CControls on exercise of protected customary rights\u201D. Basically, it says at the end of subclause (1) that \u201Cthe Minister may impose controls, including any terms, conditions, or restrictions that the Minister thinks fit, on the exercise of the [customary] rights.\u201D But from the way that I read that, that means that tino rangatiratanga again ends up in the hands of the Minister. I wonder whether that is what the M\u0101ori Party set out to achieve with its support of this bill: that the Minister, at the end of the day, has the final say about the exercising of customary rights by M\u0101ori. I am pretty sure that when the members who are now M\u0101ori Party MPs led the h\u012Bkoi back in 2004, that is not what they were marching for\u2014not just to have the Minister, at the end of the day, have the final say on the exercise of those customary rights. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000705\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EThere were submitters to the select committee who asked, when it came down to customary marine title and the exclusivity side of it, what will happen when they, through their generosity as a hap\u016B or an iwi, have allowed people to go over their land to use the beach. Angeline Greensill, who was a candidate for the M\u0101ori Party in Tainui, said there was an area of land in Raglan that her tribe had opened up, out of generosity. It had started out as a bit of a track, and then I think the local council came along and made the road a bit tidier. Members of the community were able, through the tribe\u2019s generosity, to cross over their tribal land to go and use the beach. But now this exclusivity clause means that because of their generosity, that foreshore and seabed land was not exclusively used by M\u0101ori, so they will be disadvantaged through their own generosity. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000706\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EIn a similar vein, in Blenheim the select committee heard a hap\u016B and iwi there ask about what happens when the Crown has bulldozed a road across their land and through to an area that would otherwise be totally isolated. Through an act, basically of confiscation, by the Crown, their foreshore and seabed has been opened up, and all and sundry can go there and make use of it. So is it fair to them that through an act of the Crown\u2014a confiscation, for want of a better word\u2014the seabed and foreshore has not been exclusively used by the hap\u016B and tribe? They have been disadvantaged in that aspect. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000707\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EThere is a whole concept about w\u0101hi tapu. There are w\u0101hi tapu areas and w\u0101hi tapu. I spoke last night about the M\u0101taatua waka, which is our ancestral waka in T\u0101kou Bay. That site, I consider, is a w\u0101hi tapu, but it is not necessarily in an area with customary marine title.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000708\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002241816fbce1474f3fa5e21cad6b31807f\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: Just give our waka back\u2014is that what they say?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000709\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002286b424ad6cb640c5b216c0a90c4844de\u0022\u003EKELVIN DAVIS\u003C/span\u003E: Yes\u2014T\u016Bhoe say they want their waka back, and we say that if their karakia are strong enough to refloat the M\u0101taatua waka, then they should come and get it. But the point of the matter is that the M\u0101taatua waka may not necessarily be resting in an area with customary marine title, so does that mean that that waka could still be designated as a w\u0101hi tapu when it will not necessarily be in a customary marine title area? That is just a question I have about that. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000710\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EI turn now to clause 62, \u201CCustomary transfers\u201D. Subclause (3) states that \u201Ccustomary transfer means a transfer of a customary interest in a specified part of the common marine and coastal area after 1840 if\u2014(a) the transfer was\u2014(i) between or among members of the applicant group;\u201D. I am not sure of the purpose of that. I am not sure why an applicant group would then transfer their own customary title area amongst themselves. Let us say that was possible, and let us say that Ng\u0101puhi, which spans from the east coast of Northland through to the west coast, was an applicant group. Would that mean that a customary area on the east coast could actually be transferred to our whanaunga on the west coast? And how would that actually happen? The other question is whether those transfers can be made at a cost. Could a customary interest or customary rights actually be transferred at a cost? If so, it would be like selling off the customary rights, albeit to another group within one\u2019s own applicant group.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022 data-id=\u0022e35f52f2721f4bc6bfe8c3a2743f6baf\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000711\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e35f52f2721f4bc6bfe8c3a2743f6baf\u0022\u003EPAUL QUINN (National):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022 data-id=\u0022a31b147b2b68470ea08f1b65fcab2872\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000712\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a31b147b2b68470ea08f1b65fcab2872\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA (Labour\u2014Ikaroa-R\u0101whiti):\u003C/span\u003E I thought I would take up some cutting remarks made in relation to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. Certainly, as Dr Cullen said, and as I have heard the Minister in the chair, the Attorney-General, say earlier in the debate, Labour did want to get to a better place, and we can concede in all humility that maybe we could have done better in our time. But we have got to the stage now where we need to confront those issues that are relevant to taking this issue forward, and Part 3 suggests a whole lot of matters and issues that need to be clarified.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000713\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EIt has worried me at times that some people have let rip with extremes, and have tested people\u2019s minds and manners by making extreme statements. Some people say that this bill is about Alice-in-Wonderland practices, that M\u0101ori do not know anything about customary rights, and that they would have had to hold their noses underwater. They are the sorts of outrageous statements we can do without.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000714\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EI also get a bit perturbed. Sitting outside in front of the h\u012Bkoi that day is etched on my mind, especially as some of my wh\u0101nau were on the other side. The challenges that were tossed at Labour in relation to our denying M\u0101ori access to court are now being fudged. The M\u0101ori Party members who at that time professed that Labour\u2019s Foreshore and Seabed Bill was totally wrong because of that denial of access are now supporting the same sort of stance. I am really interested in the fact that they are saying this bill is not National\u2019s bill but theirs and they are proud of it. I really wonder at the end of the day what there is to be proud about in relation to this bill, in the sense of where it is at the moment.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000715\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EThe Minister\u2019s Supplementary Order Papers have been very interesting. He has been telling tales on me to my uncle Api on what I am saying, and whatever else. He is a real nark at times, and I take umbrage at that, too.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000716\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EThe purpose of Part 3 is to set out the full extent\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000717\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224410c86cae64414db9b8dec9bb131ceb\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: But you support Te R\u014Dp\u016B Ripa. Come on! You support Mallard.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000718\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c9bfcf207e2b4f29abbb43a6b95942b6\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: What I did not support was the 500-page report being rushed through the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee by its chair, allowing no legal advice, or legal content, or direction by members. That is what I object to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000719\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EThe purpose of Subpart 1 of Part 3 is in relation to participation in conservation processes. I say to the Minister that one of the issues in Part 3 that really does concern me is the mixture and the composition of the decision making. There seems to be an illogical matrix of points of decision. The Minister of Conservation, the Minister for the Environment, the M\u0101oris sometimes, the court authorities, and some of the ideology of the Resource Management Act are crammed together. I hope that by the time we get to the end of the debate we can decipher some of that, and that the bill is more specific than Part 3 is starting to be.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000720\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EThere are a whole lot of issues. In relation to Subpart 2, \u201CProtected customary rights\u201D, those rights are described in clause 53 as rights that have been exercised since 1840. I would like to know how we are going to exercise that definition. Is it about M\u0101ori kids running and jumping in the water like their ancestors did in 1840, and having continuously swum there, dived underneath to see what is in the water, and gathered food there? Is that enough? Clause 53(1)(b) states that a protected customary right is a right that \u201Ccontinues to be exercised in a particular part of the common marine and coastal area in accordance with tikanga by the applicant group,\u201D, and clause 53(1)(c) states that it \u201Cis not extinguished as a matter of law.\u201D All through the provisions, including in Part 3, there is a real push about tikanga. It is interesting, as we read the parts, to see how tikanga is defined and who defines it. Some clauses of Part 3 suggest that tikanga can be defined by the applicant group, by the hap\u016B or the iwi involved, or it can be determined by the sanction of the Director-General of Conservation, and so on and so forth.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000721\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003ETo push that further, if we look at clause 53(3) we see that it states that \u201CAn applicant group\u201D\u2014[Interruption] Mr Chair!\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000722\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d1f85a256c7e4e80a7fde293b2359471\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: You want another call?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000723\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022689b6974ca544eac9b176ca9108c6784\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: Yes, thanks. Another two, if you do not mind. Is that all right?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000724\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002272b5a32e91474f28b5c7a37bc073ea09\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: I will judge that. One at a time.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000725\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022181d5e1c723b4018a4f26b8bceedfb97\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: It states that \u201CAn applicant group does not need to have an interest in land in or abutting the specified part of the common marine and coastal area in order to establish protected customary rights.\u201D What my learned colleague from Te Tai Tokerau Kelvin Davis said was interesting. There are learned members from Te Tai Tokerau here who know where their waka came from and have a sincere sense of belonging to Te Tai Tokerau. I mihi to him. [Interruption] He is not like Paul Quinn sitting in that far-away land over there, and he is not like Tau Henare over there, who rushed the report through the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee. My mokopuna are from Te Tai Tokerau, and I am thankful that there are decent members of this House from Te Tai Tokerau. Kelvin Davis knows where his waka came from; he is not inventing it like that member over there.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000726\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EIf we look at clause 53(3) we see that it states that \u201CAn applicant group does not need to have an interest in land in or abutting\u201D\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000727\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223042dfcb09d847ffb2d447482f6336f4\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Can I just caution the member. The nature of the exchange that has gone on was such that the member was implying that some people in this Chamber are not decent. All members are honourable members.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000728\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022557f10ce4b5545a6b48f95316386653d\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: I stand corrected, Mr Chair. Thank you. I want to tell members about the waka M\u0101taatua. The member with his fist raised in the air believes that the waka M\u0101taatua stayed in Tai Tokerau\u2014that it lived there. The member on his left\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000729\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022803002d1-e810-4bd8-b8e7-2e97d0d6f626\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00221041590ab0944d3a9a7a6053e695636d\u0022\u003EHon Simon Power\u003C/span\u003E: Where\u2019s this in the bill?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000730\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e3fbd01a8f10482bb20f5309191f1d94\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: This is very important to Part 3, I say to Simon Power. I want him to listen to this. When we define tikanga and we define aspirations, and we determine what is right or wrong in M\u0101oridom, we have to understand that there may be four or five different versions and they are all right. How will the court manage that? The bloke up there on the left would say that the M\u0101taatua waka rested in Tai Tokerau, in the Hokianga, and sits there. The bloke on his left would say that, no, it rests down by Whakat\u0101ne or \u014Cp\u014Dtiki. They are both right. How does one recognise that?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000731\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EI want to get on to this land business in the sense of supporting the test. The contiguousness that was a really strong reference in the 2004 legislation is, I hope, still important, because there is some shifty shaking in this bill. It is saying that the customary right does not necessarily have to be where one is living, by the seashore or thereabouts. It can be somewhere else. But one of the real key drivers in relation to recognising or simplifying people\u2019s rights and tuku iho is the contiguousness of the dry land that they may have lived on or controlled over generations. What they have done on that land is a different issue. They have inherited it, and they have inherited it for one reason: through their whakapapa, or their genealogical tie. How is the court or anybody else going to test that? The strength to recognise a lot of that tuku iho, or those rights, is in that contiguousness, if those people have had that whenua.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000732\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EClause 53(1) states that a protected customary right is a right exercised in accordance with tikanga. I want to make the point that tikanga takes all sorts of forms and shapes, and that there are alignments, like the contiguousness of land to the right to the water that is trying to be defined here. So those iwi who have a lot of land there should be recognised for that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000733\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EThe other thing is that clause 54(3) states that a protected customary rights order or an agreement that applies to the customary rights group can be subject to a control imposed by the Minister of Conservation under section 59. Clause 54(4) states: \u201CA protected customary rights group may do any of the following: (a) delegate the rights conferred by a protected customary rights order or an agreement in accordance with tikanga:\u201D. I am not too sure what that means. Does it mean where the M\u0101taatua waka might have gone or could be? And I say that with a whole lot of respect. Clause 54(4)(b) states: \u201Ctransfer a protected customary rights order or an agreement in accordance with tikanga:\u201D. Again, I ask the Minister who is defining tikanga in relation to those limitations, and how. Clause 56, \u201CLimitations on exercise of protected customary rights\u201D, states: \u201C(1) A protected customary right does not include any right or title over the part of the common marine and coastal area where the protected customary right is exercised,\u201D. So we have this no-people\u2019s park, which nobody owns but everybody reckons that is OK, and then the bill is saying that nobody can define or determine\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022 data-id=\u0022f54a2beff00c4e47abf2d3fef69be4ec\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000734\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f54a2beff00c4e47abf2d3fef69be4ec\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA (Independent\u2014Te Tai Tokerau):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chairman. T\u0113n\u0101 koutou katoa e te Whare. As I turn to Part 3 of this Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, I cannot help but notice how much has been made of the M\u0101ori Party statement yesterday\u2014and I quote Rahui Katene, the speaker from the M\u0101ori Party\u2014\u201CThis bill is in the House on our initiative. Make no bones about it, this is a M\u0101ori Party bill. \u2026 and we are pleased to stand here in support \u2026\u201D. As I turn to aspects outlined in Part 3, I cannot help but focus M\u0101ori people\u2019s attention on clauses that will impact dramatically and adversely on M\u0101ori rights to the foreshore and seabed, and ask why on earth the M\u0101ori Party is saying now this is a M\u0101ori Party bill, when just a few days ago Te Ururoa Flavell, when asked who was running the timetable, said National was. When he was asked who wrote the bill, he said National did. When he was asked whose bill it was, he said it was National\u2019s. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000735\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002206e4a0c20d6d4b6e862203c475f0ad68\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. This afternoon I accommodated the member from the north\u2019s wish to speak to the Chamber, as he had limited opportunities or had not necessarily taken those opportunities. If you are listening to the discussion at the moment, Mr Chairperson, you will hear that it is centred very much on the discussion that has already been put out on the part prior to this one\u2014namely, Part 2. Similar statements have been made, and there has been no discussion in respect of this particular part. I ask whether you could draw us back. Although we have had a reference to Part 3, the substance of the discussion has been nothing to do with Part 3. I ask whether you would take some care to listen out for that.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000736\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002289c7345c280a4c069daff0f328208f34\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: In relation to relevance, it is the prerogative of the Chair to rule. I have heard salient parts of this speech at least twice before. But the member has taken the call and whether he gets a second call will depend on his performance through his first call.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000737\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022bb6145fb8cf549a1b719b8ffd4e35fd9\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA\u003C/span\u003E: Thank you, Mr Chair. As I highlight just some of the clauses in Part 3 of this bill, and the M\u0101ori Party support for those clauses, I want M\u0101ori people to be constantly asking themselves why on earth the M\u0101ori Party would say \u201CMake no bones about it, this is a M\u0101ori Party bill. \u2026 and we are pleased to stand here in support \u2026\u201D.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000738\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223a560e0a56db47449d0102a5b9ca24a9\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I am aware that there has been a change of delegation, but a Chairperson is still here. I have just made a point of order in respect of the issue of relevance to this particular part of the bill. There has been no reference back to Part 3, other than to mention Part 3 with no reference to the substance. Mr Chair, I am not sure how you will refer to this, but the Chair who held the position previously said he would keep note of the relevance to this particular part, and unfortunately the situation has not changed too much. Can I ask whether you can give some clarity around that, please?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000739\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223e5f512e64ce4daa8fb63f53e45a7b32\u0022\u003EHon David Parker\u003C/span\u003E: I suggest that that complaint is hardly fair. The speaker, Hone Harawira, effectively has just repeated the sentence he was delivering before he was interrupted, and he has not yet had the opportunity to make reference to a specific clause in the bill\u2014which I have no doubt he will eventually do. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000740\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002230b50e8a30cb4424869f86453f808ed4\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: I tell members that I am delighted to hear the word \u201Cfairness\u201D used in this Chamber; I am not sure that fairness has always been the rule. But I heard the point of order made by the previous Chair, who said he was listening to the presentation with interest\u2014as I am\u2014and the Chair would make a judgment on whether the member got a second call based on the relevance of the first call. Therefore the sanction was clearly laid out to the member speaking, and to all members in the debate, that if members were not relevant to the section, then they might get the blind stare from the Chair\u2014in other words, no further calls. In the interests of debate I think that the honourable member Hone Harawira is entitled to continue with his presentation, and at the end of it we will make a judgment as to whether the member has been relevant. That will then determine whether a second call is given, should the member wish to take one.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000741\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00222e102507d0104cc8a25517dbba9aaba1\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA\u003C/span\u003E: Does the M\u0101ori Party know that under Part 3 of this bill, a protected customary right is a right that has been exercised since 1840, continues to be exercised in a particular part of the common marine and coastal area in accordance with tikanga, and is not already extinguished as a matter of law? If the M\u0101ori Party does in fact know this, is it because this clause was either included at that party\u2019s request, or perhaps even written by the party? Is that why the M\u0101ori Party is saying: \u201CMake no bones about it, this is a M\u0101ori Party bill. \u2026 and we are pleased to stand here in support \u2026\u201D?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000742\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EDoes the M\u0101ori Party know that under Part 3 of this bill, the scope, effect, and limitations of protected M\u0101ori customary rights are defined and overseen entirely by Government, Government statutes, and the courts, and that wh\u0101nau, hap\u016B, and iwi have no role in that process? Is that what the M\u0101ori Party means when it talks about rangatiratanga?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000743\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EDoes the M\u0101ori Party know that under Part 3 of this bill, the Minister of Conservation has the right to impose controls, including any terms, conditions, or restrictions that the Minister sees fit, on the exercise of protected M\u0101ori customary rights? If the M\u0101ori Party does in fact know this, is it because this clause was included at the party\u2019s request, or perhaps even written by the party, and is that why the M\u0101ori Party is happy to say: \u201CMake no bones about it, this is a M\u0101ori Party bill. \u2026 and we are pleased to stand here in support \u2026\u201D?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000744\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EDoes the M\u0101ori Party know that under Part 3 of this bill, M\u0101ori must hold the specified area in accordance with tikanga, and must have exclusively used and occupied the specified area from 1840 to the present day without substantial interruption? If the M\u0101ori Party does in fact know this, is it because this clause was included at the party\u2019s request or was perhaps even written by the party, or did it simply transfer the clause from Labour\u2019s hated 2004 Foreshore and Seabed Act across to this hated 2011 bill? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000745\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EDoes the M\u0101ori Party know that under clause 49(2) in Part 3 of this bill, supposedly, \u201Chap\u016B means a hap\u016B listed in the constitutional documents of an iwi \u2026\u201D, and \u201Ciwi means an iwi listed in schedule 4 of the M\u0101ori Fisheries Act 2004.\u201D? Is the granting of authority to the Crown to determine M\u0101ori entities what the M\u0101ori Party means when it talks about rangatiratanga? \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000746\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EDoes the M\u0101ori Party know that under Part 3 of this bill, a protected customary right does not affect the granting of a coastal permit under the resource\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00226984d661-9f65-4ed6-b29c-3285b598582d\u0022 data-id=\u00225ec44ee628ef4514a262f572a9397a62\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000747\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00226984d661-9f65-4ed6-b29c-3285b598582d\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225ec44ee628ef4514a262f572a9397a62\u0022\u003EHon JOHN CARTER (Minister of Civil Defence):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022 data-id=\u00221d75bc1f15ca47288e97ebb3442e37c1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000748\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00221d75bc1f15ca47288e97ebb3442e37c1\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA (Labour\u2014Ikaroa-R\u0101whiti):\u003C/span\u003E There are some interesting things in Part 3. I have been trying to deduce why the Attorney-General has moved, with some flourish, from the sequencing of wh\u0101nau, hap\u016B, and iwi in clause 3. He has turned it round quietly on his Supplementary Order Paper 207 to iwi, hap\u016B, and wh\u0101nau. That is one thing Hone Harawira has said right tonight. He has deduced that the Minister is trying to set it up in a single area, for it to be controlled and manifested, in the sense of direction, by the group he is comfortable with.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000749\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EI turn to clause 81, which is about newly found taonga t\u016Bturu. I wonder whether I can jog the Minister\u2019s support by suggesting that this is quite a powerful part for M\u0101oridom. I wonder how he defines and determines taonga t\u016Bturu, which in my translation is the gift or sub-property that has been there for ever and ever. Clause 81(1) states: \u201CAny taonga t\u016Bturu found in a customary marine title area on or after the effective date is prima facie the property of the relevant customary marine title group.\u201D\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000750\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002255104e78abfb48cf8c5e95a03010eff6\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: What\u2019s wrong with that?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000751\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002256f7fe1854e141bcaecc9c07261b14d9\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: It is very good. It is suggesting that all new-found minerals there belong to the title holders. I ask the Minister to make quite clear whether that is what it means. I suppose the other part is the controls. Clause 58(1) states that \u201CIf, at any time, the Minister of Conservation determines\u2019\u2019. We have talked about all these issues that are relevant and strong for M\u0101ori and will benefit them, but then we come down to this quite cutting, exact, not too dissimilar legislation that defines\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000752\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e6587f9c4298435bb4bf58ec4ffcc189\u0022\u003EHon Shane Jones\u003C/span\u003E: Dodgy.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000753\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002250511768e05b437280c6572cfa7018ae\u0022\u003EHon PAREKURA HOROMIA\u003C/span\u003E: It could be dodgy, but it defines, in that great litigious way, that \u201CIf, at any time, the Minister of Conservation determines that the exercise of protected customary rights under a protected customary rights order, or agreement has, or is likely to have, a significant adverse effect on the environment, the Minister may impose controls, including any terms, conditions, or restrictions that the Minister thinks fit, on the exercise of the rights.\u201D That is really fascinating. We are trying to push this up to include statements of freedom, but what that provision really says is that, bang, all over, the Minister decides. And where does everything else sit in the sense of sequencing? What are the M\u0101ori Party members thinking when they boast that this bill is their bill, in relation to what could easily be put asunder by what some may perceive as general bureaucratic rhetoric but most think is, at the end of the day, a slippery, slimy way of controlling things?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000754\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EClause 58(2) states: \u201CAny person may apply to the Minister of Conservation for controls to be imposed on the exercise of a protected customary right, stating the reasons for the application.\u201D I hope that in a late Supplementary Order Paper the Minister will withdraw \u201Cany person\u201D. One thing that is becoming starkly evident is a return to the old practice of divide and rule, with everybody setting to on everybody else, as they did, as Mr Jones would say, in the summaries of the schedules for the fisheries allocation. That is something nobody wants, and we tire of it. I hope that is not what the M\u0101ori Party is trying to ensure happens. At the end of the day, it is something that Labour members would not support.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000755\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022d52e59e3-2195-4c95-a654-665c11b39b63\u0022\u003EI come back to the taonga t\u016Bturu. Clause 81(3) states: \u201CAny person finding a taonga t\u016Bturu in a customary marine title area has a duty to notify the finding within 28 days,\u201D\u2014and then it gets quite specific. Subclause (4) states: \u201CThe obligations of the chief executive\u201D\u2014whoever that may be\u2014\u201Cunder section 11(4) of the Protected Objects Act 1975 apply, but with the following modifications:\u201D, which are listed in paragraphs (a) and (b). Are we talking about singular objects, in the sense of art and craft? Are we talking about the paddle that fell off the waka, or whatever else? Or are we talking about a collective group of taonga, like minerals and whatever else? Hangi stones are minerals. They seem to be OK. What about something more minute\u2014molecules, or whatever we call them, the clusters\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022 data-id=\u002285861c242396411f957e0ea7891bc8f9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000756\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002285861c242396411f957e0ea7891bc8f9\u0022\u003EHILARY CALVERT (ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I start by commending the honourable member on the other side of the Chamber who has spent much time this evening talking about tikanga and making it clear to all of us that tikanga is not something we all know means a particular thing; it has different meanings to different people and therefore should not be, in our opinion, a word defined in the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000757\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EI will talk about special resource management rights, which are not available to other landowners under this bill. We have an example of how muddled this whole issue is. National and the M\u0101ori Party have invented a whole new property right. They had available to them freehold title, and they had available to them the courts to determine whether people had common law property rights and to grant freehold title. They could have done that, but instead they chose to produce a whole new property right. On the one hand, it is less than freehold; it does not allow owners to do a lot of things that owners of a freehold title are usually able to do, and that somebody who owns something is usually able to do. On the other hand, it gives customary titleholders a lot more than private landowners. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000758\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EThe Resource Management Act denies those who have scrimped and saved to buy their own property the right to use their land as they wish. Meanwhile, those with customary title\u2014which it is clear may arise in the future as a political gift, rather than by a process of law\u2014are given special rights to do what they like, and undue influence to veto much-needed economic development. Of course, we expect that many developments could be allowed to go ahead, at a price. Most submitters who expressed a view on these special rights believe that there is a strong likelihood that title holders will charge for the granting of these rights. This will make many possible commercial activities too expensive to undertake. When an otherwise economic activity becomes uneconomic, everybody is worse off. All this is on land that title holders, according to the Government, do not own freehold. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000759\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EIn short, these clauses allow a customary title holder the right to give or withhold permission for activities that resource consent is required for, on any grounds, with no right of appeal or objection; to demand fees from any and all comers for permissions without limit; and to define w\u0101hi tapu areas, to control not merely the use of a w\u0101hi tapu site but the possibility of the use of such areas by the payment of koha. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000760\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a16ff0e28aee4b73b6955344b407d0f3\u0022\u003EHon Shane Jones\u003C/span\u003E: Koha h\u014Dh\u0101?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000761\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226f649891810f46d6b0e3b3ea70614760\u0022\u003EHILARY CALVERT\u003C/span\u003E: Excuse me\u2014koha. These rights are not available to any other New Zealanders. We should not have special laws based on race in New Zealand. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000762\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EThe bill still allows iwi to have special conservation permission rights that can be declined or given for special conservation activities. The Environmental Defence Society, which came along to the submission process\u2014in good faith I might add\u2014did a very good job of summing up the argument against this. It, like many, objects to the gifting of far stronger rights than those of private landowners. There is also a huge conflict of interest for many iwi here. Those with financial interests in aquaculture and commercial fishing cannot be expected to make impartial or rational decisions on the extension of marine reserves. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000763\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022c53e4642-d448-4d84-abfe-0443fe24aae9\u0022\u003EIn Subpart 3 there is a right for customary marine title holders to prepare their own planning documents, and the preparation of these planning documents is a serious issue. They can include all areas where the customary marine title holder\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022 data-id=\u0022af4e6651f447440dadfac1b08cffefa7\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000764\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022af4e6651f447440dadfac1b08cffefa7\u0022\u003EDAVID CLENDON (Green):\u003C/span\u003E Kia ora koutou katoa. I am pleased to take a call on the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. It is the first call I have had the opportunity to take, having been out of the House for the last several days doing work elsewhere. Although I have not had the opportunity to speak in the House, I have had ample opportunity to speak outside of the House. As this bill is being debated here\u2014in particular tonight the question of the test of proving customary right\u2014so too is it being debated around this country. I have been around the country quite extensively in the last week or so. At every turn people have been focusing on this debate. This debate is being watched; it is being participated in. It is an important debate for that reason alone. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000765\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003EI was asked yesterday whether there is anything good about this legislation. Could I find a positive thing to say about it? The best I could come up with was that this bill is likely to be the low point of this term of Parliament. It is unlikely that we will see a more offensive piece of legislation come into this House any time soon. It is a low point. It is an offensive piece of legislation. It manages to offend liberals. It manages to offend conservatives. It manages to offend M\u0101ori and non-M\u0101ori. At every point on the political spectrum there is opposition to this bill. The only difference about the debate within the House and the debate that is occurring outside of the House is that within the House it is still possible to find a few people who will stand and support the bill. In my experience that is almost impossible to find outside. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000766\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003EMuch of the debate revolves round this test, this so-called test, which actually is an exclusionary statement. It seeks to exclude M\u0101ori from proving customary right and, therefore, having their rights respected. At the time of the signing of the Treaty a number of our t\u016Bpuna were persuaded to sign that document because it was put to them that signing the Treaty gave the shadow of the land to the Crown but the substance remained with ng\u0101 iwi, with the hap\u016B, and with the wh\u0101nau. This bill very effectively reverses that. At best, M\u0101ori will have the shadow of a right. They will have the reflection, the memory, of a right. They will not have the substance of that right. This legal fiction, this nonsense of non-ownership puts ownership control\u2014real control\u2014 firmly in the hands of the Crown and denies it to M\u0101ori. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000767\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003EThis bill joins a shameful list. It may be instructive, for even members within this House, and certainly for people outside, to go to the Treaty Resource Centre website, which has a very well-collated list of legislative transgressions of Te Tiriti. This bill most certainly will join that list if it is, in fact, passed into law. Since the early 1840s, very shortly after the signing of the Treaty, legislation has been passed that has transgressed the spirit, the letter, the principles, and whatever of the Treaty, and this bill will add to that list. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000768\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003EThe notion of exclusive undisturbed use and occupation is foreign to M\u0101ori in the sense that M\u0101ori are a generous people, a hospitable people. Hospitality and the display of generosity is respected and adds mana to individuals, to hap\u016B, and to iwi. The notion of exclusivity and the demand that exclusive use must be demonstrated is anathema to that notion of hospitality, of generosity of sharing, and, indeed, of cooperation M\u0101ori share resources routinely within and between hap\u016B and iwi, and share access to resources at given times of year\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000769\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022eb58dd38e9014363b8058a0f7b48c717\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: Come on this is 2010, not 1845!\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000770\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022e959f20f-3de7-4f54-8577-8ea78d72c3dd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226fced34dd3a4473083ebee6e2cadf1b5\u0022\u003EDAVID CLENDON\u003C/span\u003E: This is indeed 2010, 2011. The principle of reciprocity, of generosity has not gone away, at least for the M\u0101ori I know and respect. My whakapapa, my interests, and my preference take me to Tai Tokerau\u2014take me to that place. From my discussions and my interactions in the north, everywhere I go I hear opposition to this bill from M\u0101ori and non-M\u0101ori alike. Those who suggest Hone Harawira is representing his own view or the view of a small bunch of radical activists are 110 percent wrong. Everywhere and anywhere, from the most moderate M\u0101ori through to the most radical non-M\u0101ori, this bill is being opposed in Tai Tokerau.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022803002d1-e810-4bd8-b8e7-2e97d0d6f626\u0022 data-id=\u0022a10fc58a5c8246b69e9c015bd36ea2ef\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000771\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022803002d1-e810-4bd8-b8e7-2e97d0d6f626\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a10fc58a5c8246b69e9c015bd36ea2ef\u0022\u003EHon SIMON POWER (Deputy Leader of the House):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000772\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022d7927ce62132437fb17ef23a520f8fb5\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: No, I will take some more calls because this is the most substantive part of the bill.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000773\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022803002d1-e810-4bd8-b8e7-2e97d0d6f626\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224e2d4d8d34954a0f96d376452ff5bee3\u0022\u003EHon Simon Power\u003C/span\u003E: That\u2019s what they said about Part 2, Mr Chairperson.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000774\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022998836964b0f41779543267a4a37ee03\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: I was not here for the debate on Part 2. I have had a look and it is quite a substantive part. People are on task, and there has been no repetition.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022 data-id=\u00228d0093fba6814a5d9abd457f908a7b06\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000775\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228d0093fba6814a5d9abd457f908a7b06\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E It is notable that National has taken no calls this evening on the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, except for calls to call closures\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000776\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022803002d1-e810-4bd8-b8e7-2e97d0d6f626\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e1d1eb510d804b9592c3e251228ebf9c\u0022\u003EHon Simon Power\u003C/span\u003E: I just took a call.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000777\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00227c703c6c44f5441ea50735bf07806d5f\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER\u003C/span\u003E: Except to call closures. There has not been one substantive contribution from National, nor from the M\u0101ori Party. They are just trying to put this through\u2014no, the Minister in the chair, the Hon Christopher Finlayson, made an initial contribution, but there has been no contribution from any member on the opposite side of the Chamber except for the Minister in the chair. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000778\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EThe last time I spoke I explained to the Committee why the Labour Party moved from preferring codification of the tests in legislation, and I dealt, I thought, with the issue that the Attorney-General raised in his initial contribution. I want to now refer to two issues where there are problems with the statutory codification. The first is that I do not understand why in clause 60(2), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson\u2014but in this respect it is not much different from the form that was in the original bill\u2014there is no substantial interruption of the exclusive use and occupation of a specified area by virtue of the fact of a resource consent for an activity being granted between the commencement of the Act and the effective date. That is a strange thing for me, because it almost implies that if there was a resource consent granted outside that period, it does undermine exclusive use and occupation since 1840. So what is the case in respect of resource consents granted, for example, between the Ng\u0101ti Apa decision and the date of this bill? That is one example of a situation where I think there will be a sense of injustice amongst M\u0101oridom as to the effect of this legislation. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000779\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EAnother one where we have problems is that the Government decided early on that it would stick with exclusive use and occupation, and then it decided that it could envisage times when there could be more than one party with a customary right that could have co-existed back in 1840. It came up with the concept that more than one party could have exclusive use and control; in effect, one could say that someone did it jointly. So the Government thought that it needed to accommodate that somehow. The Government has a mechanism in the bill that allows more than one party to come forward and to effectively have customary title rights that overlap each other. I have no problem with that. But what I have a problem with is that the Government then came out and said that if one person applies for recognition of rights, someone else has to put up their hand at the same time. By the time it gets through the process in respect of that first right\u2014and it might have the second party involved\u2014anyone else who was ignorant of the process, or who did not at that time have the resources to pursue recognition of their extant right, loses their right if they do not put their hand up within that period. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000780\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EI cannot see how that is fair. I do not think a court would do that. I do not think a court would say: \u201CLook, I\u2019m sorry. You may have had rights, but because we\u2019ve recognised somebody else\u2019s rights we will not recognise yours.\u201D We can have rights that coexist. Why are we codifying this legislation in a way that makes people lose their rights just because they did not take part in the process? The issue is made even worse given the fact that some of those processes will not be through court processes. I have great trust in the processes run by the courts to protect the various interests involved when there are competing private interests within those terms\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000781\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002267431f57-e958-4c83-b438-7da8061d479e\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002251c8acf7ab5f414387983920cf98f834\u0022\u003EPaul Quinn\u003C/span\u003E: Why didn\u2019t you write that into the Foreshore and Seabed Act, David?\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000782\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00226aca1bfab1ee40c8be07e0151ffe9eb4\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER\u003C/span\u003E: Oh, look. Here we go. We have National crowing again about why did we not do this, and why did we not do that in the 2004 Act. We did that because people like the man who is sitting next to that member rarked up race relations\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000783\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00228a5de081a4114b22a7bdbe35b1c0c946\u0022\u003EHon Shane Jones\u003C/span\u003E: With Don Brash!\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000784\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022847503ad9efb4080afb82aa07e6461f7\u0022\u003EHon DAVID PARKER\u003C/span\u003E:\u2014with Don Brash on talkback radio, and brought out the racism in New Zealand that is oh, so close to the surface whenever we scratch these itches. That is one of the reasons that we did not get that legislation perfect. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000785\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f5d71749-ae91-4af7-b2bd-77260398912a\u0022\u003EI also say that although the 2004 Act was not perfect, it was not nearly as bad as it has been characterised by its critics. We have said, though, there was an important impediment in the Act that we passed\u2014we acknowledge that we got that wrong\u2014and that is that a person should be able to get a court remedy. A person should be able to get a court remedy if they have an extant interest that had not been extinguished.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022 data-id=\u0022ccac9cef07af407cae20a96076f14e12\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000786\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022ccac9cef07af407cae20a96076f14e12\u0022\u003EMETIRIA TUREI (Co-Leader\u2014Green):\u003C/span\u003E The Green Party has a number of amendments on the table to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. Just for those who maybe cannot hear what is going on in the Chamber, Tau Henare is very grumpy because his party will not let him speak on the legislation, because National and the M\u0101ori Party want it to proceed very quickly. So instead of speaking and taking the call like the mature, responsible members of Parliament who want to debate the issue, he is shouting at all of the members as they speak. It is a sad indictment on the way National and the M\u0101ori Party have whipped their members such that their people who are knowledgable about the issue, such as Tau Henare, who was on the select committee, are not able to speak on it, and it is a real shame. It leads to a great deal of shouting, which I am sure members of the public can hear through their radios and televisions. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000787\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EHowever, the Green Party has a number of amendments to the bill, and we would like to discuss those in a rational, mature way, as opposed to shouting a lot. The amendments deal mostly with the test, because this part of the legislation deals with the tests for customary marine title and for the protected customary rights. In Labour\u2019s Act these were called territorial customary rights and customary rights, I think. So they are effectively the same two sets of rights that Labour had but they just have a different name. The protected customary right is the right to engage in an activity on the land. The customary marine title is a greater set of rights based around the idea that the iwi might have had proper customary title determined by the court. So those are the two sets of rights in this part that M\u0101ori can access if they go to the courts, and if they do their negotiations with the Government. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000788\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThe amendment the Green Party has put up is essentially to delete those tests. We do not believe that it is right for the Government to set the tests for how M\u0101ori should be able to claim or prove either their customary rights or their customary title. It is our view, and has always been our view, that the courts are the ones who should be setting those tests. The reason for that is that the Crown has an interest in keeping the bar for those tests very, very high. It was certainly the case under the previous Labour Government, and is under the National Government, that Governments tend to look first at their economic interests in the retention of their political power before they look at issues such as justice and what is right. I think we have seen that, over this issue, with both kinds of Governments we have had. The economic interest of Government has been in keeping the ownership in control of the mineral resources of the marine and coastal area. We saw that last time, when applications for mining came to a halt during the foreshore and seabed debate and deliberations, and were then ramped up massively after the bill was passed, when the Crown had acquired ownership of these areas for itself in legislation. Since then, there have been a great number of applications for marine and coastal mining in this area, and that continues. Again, in this bill we have the Government doing the same thing\u2014acquiring for itself using a legal fiction to make sure it retains control of those areas. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000789\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThat is one of the interests that has gone into the nature of these tests\u2014how high the bar should be set for M\u0101ori to prove their customary title, if it interferes then with the Government\u2019s economic interests. On the other side are the political considerations, as well. We do not believe that the Government should be setting those tests, because they have an interest in keeping that land for themselves for political and economic reasons. It is actually fairer and more just for the courts to determine these tests, in our view. The reason we considered that\u2014and I know that my colleague Catherine Delahunty spoke about this earlier\u2014is that the courts do not have those same political and economic interests. Courts do not do things perfectly, either; we have seen lots of examples of problems. But their primary concern\u2014at least structurally\u2014is stability of justice, making sure that justice is met. They will also have the ability to look wider than the Government is prepared to. One of those areas, for example, is looking at the history of colonisation in this country. The Waitangi Tribunal reports have set out year after year how land has been unlawfully taken by the Crown, been utilised, had structures built on it, had things done to it, and been kept out of M\u0101ori hands.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022 data-id=\u002276a3b745d0bc4f2e94094356967a3626\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000790\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002276a3b745d0bc4f2e94094356967a3626\u0022\u003ETE URUROA FLAVELL (M\u0101ori Party\u2014Waiariki):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chairman, kia ora t\u0101tou e te Whare. Kua t\u016B ake m\u014D te w\u0101 poto, kaua m\u014D te w\u0101 roa. N\u0101 runga i te aha? N\u0101 runga i te mea, he hiahia n\u014Dku ki te whaiwhai haere i te k\u014Drero o ng\u0101 m\u0101tua, o ng\u0101 t\u016Bpuna, whakatikahia te h\u0113 ki te pono. N\u0101 runga i t\u0113r\u0101 k\u014Drero, koi nei au i t\u016B ake. Kua rongo ake i te \u0101huatanga o ng\u0101 k\u014Drero m\u014D t\u0113nei w\u0101hanga, me te k\u012B atu, \u0101, \u0101 ng\u0101 tau kei mua i te aroaro, ko ng\u0101 k\u014Drero ka k\u014Drerohia i roto i te Whare nei, \u0101, ka tuhia ki roto i te Hansard m\u014D ake, ake, ake tonu atu. N\u014D reira kua t\u016B ake, kei p\u014Dh\u0113h\u0113 \u0113tahi, k\u0101ore te mema o te n\u014Dta i reira i te w\u0101 i whiriwhirihia \u0113nei take nui, whakaharahara. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000791\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EM\u014D te roanga o te tau kua hipa ake, i a m\u0101tou o te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori me te N\u0101hinara e titiro ana ki t\u0113nei w\u0101hanga, te w\u0101hanga tuatoru; i a m\u0101tou e titiro ana ki ng\u0101 customary interests, ki ng\u0101 protected customary rights, ki ng\u0101 controls, i tono mai te Minita i ng\u0101 k\u014Drero katoa ki roto i te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori, ki reira wetewetengia ai. I a m\u0101tou e k\u014Drero ana m\u014D te determination of customary marine title, the rights under customary marine title, accommodated activities, i tae mai te Minita ia wiki, ia wiki, ki te whakam\u0101rama mai ki te k\u0101hui M\u0101ori ki te h\u014Dhonutanga o \u0113r\u0101 take, me t\u0101 m\u0101tou k\u014Drero, p\u0101tai ki a ia. I a m\u0101tou e titiro ana ki ng\u0101 Resource Management Act permission rights, ki ng\u0101 conservation rights, i reira te mema o te n\u014Dta, i roto i t\u014D m\u0101tou k\u0101hui, e whakarongo ana ki ng\u0101 k\u014Drero m\u014D te h\u014Dhonutanga o \u0113nei k\u014Drero. Ka mutu, i a m\u0101tou e \u0101ta wetewete ana i ng\u0101 protection purposes, t\u0113nei w\u0101hanga o te mea nei, i \u0101hei tonu te mema ki te p\u0101tai i te Minita, ki te \u0101ta p\u0101tai ki ng\u0101 kai\u0101whina o te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori, m\u014D te h\u014Dhonutanga o \u0113nei take, tae atu ki ng\u0101 taonga t\u016Bturu, ki te status of minerals, m\u014D te \u0101huatanga o ng\u0101 planning documents, o roto i t\u0113nei w\u0101hanga, ka mutu, ko te katoa. I te w\u0101tea m\u0101tou katoa, tae atu ki t\u0113r\u0101 mema, te p\u0101tai i ng\u0101 p\u0101tai, te whiu atu i te p\u0101tai ki te tangata, kia taea ai e m\u0101tou te ruku ki roto i te h\u014Dhonutanga o te take nei. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000792\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EEngari, karekau he paku p\u0101tai i puta, karekau. Karekau he paku k\u014Drero i puta, kei p\u014Dh\u0113h\u0113, \u0101, n\u014D m\u0101tou anake t\u0113nei whiriwhiringa, karekau, k\u0101o. M\u0101tou katoa i titiro ki te h\u014Dhonutanga o te protection purposes, \u0113nei \u0101huatanga katoa. N\u014D reira ko t\u0101ku noa ake ko te k\u012B atu, tae r\u0101 an\u014D ki te p\u014D whakamutunga m\u014D te w\u0101 ka tae mai t\u0113nei pire ki konei, m\u0101tou tokorima, i reira. M\u0101tou tokorima i reira. I p\u0101 te ringa ki te pire nei, tokorima ng\u0101 ringa i p\u0101 ki te pire nei. N\u014D reira ko t\u0101ku noa ake he whakam\u0101rama m\u014D te pukapuka \u0101 ng\u0101 tau kei mua i te aroaro. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000793\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u0100e, ko te P\u0101ti M\u0101ori e noho nei i te taha o te K\u0101wanatanga ki te \u0101ta whiriwhiri, te whakatikatika i ng\u0101 kupu katoa, i ng\u0101 k\u014Drero katoa, ki te whakah\u0113 i te mahi t\u016Bkino a te R\u014Dp\u016B Reipa i te w\u0101 i a r\u0101tou, \u0101, ki te whakatikatika i te h\u0113 i tau mai ki runga i te iwi M\u0101ori, ki te whakatikatika i t\u0113r\u0101 h\u0113. Koi nei te hua o \u0113n\u0101 k\u014Drero. Okorima te hunga i wetewete i te take nei, \u0101, tokowh\u0101 i t\u014Dna mutunga mai i whaiwhai haere ki t\u014Dna mutunga. He whakam\u0101rama ake t\u0113nei ki te Whare, m\u014D ake nei.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000794\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[Thank you, Mr Chairman, and greetings to the House. I rise for a brief moment, not a long one. And for what purpose? It is because I want to follow up advice of the elders and ancestors, which is to correct a mistruth, with the truth. So I rise. I have heard the contributions made to this part of the bill, and remind members that what is stated in this House is recorded in the Hansard for the future, and for ever. Therefore, I rise in case some members get the impression that the member from the far north was not present at the time when these very important matters were discussed and considered. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000795\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EFor most of the past year, we, the M\u0101ori Party and National, have examined this Part 3. As we looked at customary interests, protected customary rights, and various controls, the Minister sent all the information to the M\u0101ori Party caucus for us to analyse. And while we discussed the determination of customary marine title, the rights under customary marine title, and accommodated activities, the Minister came every week to explain the depth of those matters to the M\u0101ori Party. We questioned him then. While we were looking at the permission rights and conservation rights in the Resource Management Act, the member from the far north was present in our caucus meetings, listening to the details. And while we analysed the protection purposes in this part, the member had the opportunity to ask questions of the Minister, and to ask M\u0101ori Party staff about the complex nature of these issues. That included the status of minerals, planning documents within this part, everything. All of us, including that member, were able to ask questions so that we could delve into the complexity of this issue. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000796\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EHowever, no questions were asked\u2014none at all. Nothing was said then, lest some assume that we made this decision on our own\u2014no. We all looked into the deeper details about protection purposes, all of these aspects. So I want to simply state that the five of us were present right up to the final night when this bill was to come before the House. All five of us were there. All five had a hand in this bill. I just want to make an explanation for the official record. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000797\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003EYes, the M\u0101ori Party sits alongside the Government to carefully consider and amend any wording and statement in the bill, and condemn the harmful actions of the Labour Party when it was in Government; to rectify the wrongdoing that befell the M\u0101ori people, and put it right. What you have before you is the outcome. Five members analysed this matter, but at the end of it four members are following it through to its conclusion. This is an explanation to the House, for the record.]\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022 data-id=\u0022e727d660b50948fd806962891f4cb723\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000798\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022a83ea07a-806c-45ad-95bb-eb2c481cd0e2\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e727d660b50948fd806962891f4cb723\u0022\u003EHon TONY RYALL (Minister of Health):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022 data-id=\u00226a753b011311454684334755777ca079\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000799\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226a753b011311454684334755777ca079\u0022\u003EKELVIN DAVIS (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E First of all, I need to take issue with what the ACT Party keeps on saying about M\u0101ori being gifted or given special rights, because that is not true. What we are talking about here with regard to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill are the rights that M\u0101ori have always had. M\u0101ori have been here since way before 1840. Our way of life and what we have done has not changed; we are just pursuing the rights that we have always had. I really take issue with the misconception that M\u0101ori have been plonked here recently and given special rights. M\u0101ori are pursuing the rights that we have always believed we had. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000800\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EHaving thrown that brickbat, this is not a bouquet for the ACT Party but more of an acknowledgment of an issue that the Hon John Boscawen has raised about w\u0101hi tapu, and the concern that we as M\u0101ori will claim every single square kilometre of the foreshore and seabed as a w\u0101hi tapu, in order to exclude people. I think we need to be careful as M\u0101ori that we do not try to make out that every single area where we can launch a waka, for example, is some sort of sacred area. I could say that the boat ramp at Waitangi is a w\u0101hi tapu, because I could tell my children that their tupuna launched his waka there, when in fact I am just referring to their grandfather launching a 9-foot tinny. We have to be careful that we do not try to make areas tapu that are not tapu. In fact if something is being regularly and commonly used, it is actually noa, which is the opposite of tapu. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000801\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EThat is a word of caution, I believe, to M\u0101ori that we do not fuel the arguments that the ACT Party is dishing out there, stating that M\u0101ori will make every area of the takutai moana a w\u0101hi tapu because our t\u016Bpuna might have walked there\u2014our t\u016Bpuna being our fathers, say, and our grandfathers. That is just a word of caution. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000802\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EI also think we need to acknowledge the Moriori contribution in the select committee stage on this bill in the M\u0101ori Affairs Committee. Moriori were not happy with the clause that states that the foreshore and seabed has to have been exclusively used and occupied since 1840, because in 1835 they were invaded, and a lot of their rights were taken away 5 years before the date that we have written in here of 1840. Moriori believe that their rights will be denied if that provision regarding exclusive use and occupation since 1840 is put through. I think it is important that we acknowledge the contribution from the Moriori of the Chatham Islands / R\u0113kohu. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000803\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022802874a3-deca-48b7-9d33-9087058892f5\u0022\u003EI also want to bring up a point about the wardens that are mentioned in clause 79. I really think it is important, because hap\u016B and iwi are able to appoint wardens, that there is some way for those wardens to be identified if people come along to the beach and find there is a warden guarding a wahi tap\u016B. Although I find it hard to believe that someone will be standing around in a w\u0101hi tapu, just waiting to tell people to go away, I think there needs to be some sort of mechanism for recognising wardens. We do not want to have a situation whereby a M\u0101ori person who is just a standing there, enjoying the beach, and minding their own business is accused of intimidating people. We do not want that to be used as an excuse by people to say wardens are there to scare people off. The whole issue of the wardens, I think, needs to be examined and thought through really carefully, so that M\u0101ori are not mistaken for somebody whom they are not. Again, I say there might be confusion between the definitions of \u201Cwarden\u201D in this bill and in the Maori Community Development Act. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022 data-id=\u002217d2d88fc4c24bf99fc873c799a2cb5a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000804\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002217d2d88fc4c24bf99fc873c799a2cb5a\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA (Independent\u2014Te Tai Tokerau):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chairperson. I will not respond by talking about other people\u2019s relationships with Ministers of the National Party, or about the National Government at all. I will talk about the bill. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000805\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EPart 3 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, which includes a whole host of clauses that will do huge damage to the M\u0101ori world, cause great pain to the M\u0101ori people, set down some truly appalling benchmarks in respect of M\u0101ori rights, and turn the clock backwards on M\u0101ori self-determination. M\u0101ori people for many generations to come will wonder how on earth the M\u0101ori Party, which rode into power on a wave of discontent over the confiscation of M\u0101ori rights to the foreshore and seabed, claimed the bill as its own, when the only other party in this House that supports it is the party that gave us Don Brash, tax breaks for the rich, cuts in social spending, an increase in GST, and the \u201Cthree-strikes\u201D legislation. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000806\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003EAlthough I have the energy to challenge this bill in the House, given the shortness of time we have had to study it, it is difficult to find the time, the space, or the capacity to properly detail all of the clauses in Part 3\u2014and in all other parts of this bill\u2014and to provide the in-depth examination that is properly required to show just how much this bill will hurt M\u0101ori. I stand against not only Part 3 of this bill\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000807\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002279db8b64-1f9b-4416-9b81-a12963db9cbf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022ea604b908dfa4354a61c62d8caefb8aa\u0022\u003EHon Trevor Mallard\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. As part of a little exchange an extremely offensive comment was made to me, about me, by Tau Henare. I require that he apologises.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000808\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022379aa64cbf184582a60053f1705dfc4e\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: I am sorry. There was a bit of a din in the Chamber; I did not hear it. If the member made an offensive remark, he will withdraw and apologise.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000809\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a16c2807d5bf475ca36e22755e5b1a68\u0022\u003EHon Tau Henare\u003C/span\u003E: I withdraw and apologise.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000810\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a6a0b636f3434805b6e461c683c9a868\u0022\u003EHONE HARAWIRA\u003C/span\u003E: I stand against not only Part 3 and all of its clauses but every other part, clause, subclause, and word in this bill. I do so because M\u0101ori people have declared their opposition to this bill, every part of this bill, through the submission process, through the iwi leadership walking away from this bill, through the h\u012Bkoi on the road right now to oppose the bill, and through the hundreds of emails, texts, Facebook messages, voicemails, and comments that I have received from M\u0101ori Party members telling me they are gutted by what their caucus is doing in supporting Part 3 and all other parts of this bill. They intend to leave the M\u0101ori Party over what they perceive to be the M\u0101ori Party caucus\u2019 betrayal of the very birthright of the party. When the M\u0101ori Party caucus says that make no bones, it is a M\u0101ori Party bill and they are pleased to stand here and support it, I remind the Committee that it is not true to say the M\u0101ori Party is proud to support this bill. The caucus does, but the membership does not. I urge all those M\u0101ori Party members who are watching the debate on Part 3 of this heinous bill on Parliament TV or are listening to it on the radio to contact the M\u0101ori Party MPs and beg them to wake up, smell the shellfish, and realise that supporting this bill is not what either the party or the people want. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000811\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003ET\u016B te Ao M\u0101ori, t\u016B te rangatiratanga, t\u016B motuhake. T\u0113n\u0101 t\u0101tou katoa.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000812\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u00227883c85e-a5bb-4a12-9962-80df55af0ecd\u0022\u003E[Long live M\u0101oridom, sovereignty, and independence. Greetings to us all.] \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022 data-id=\u0022f6a5fb3dad4e4c4da7c9e0dd1e543266\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000813\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f6a5fb3dad4e4c4da7c9e0dd1e543266\u0022\u003EMETIRIA TUREI (Co-Leader\u2014Green):\u003C/span\u003E I was speaking earlier about the Green Party\u2019s amendments to Part 3 of the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. Our amendments would omit the two sets of tests, and I explained why that was the case. I talked about the Green Party\u2019s belief that M\u0101ori should have the right to go to the courts and that that right should be restored in full, not in the Clayton\u2019s version that is set out in this bill. We say the right to go to the courts should be restored in full, and the courts should determine the tests required to prove that M\u0101ori have customary title. The courts should work out what customary title might mean. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000814\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThe reason we think the courts are in a better position to do this than the Government is that the courts do not have the same political and economic interests that Governments do in setting the bar high. I say \u201CGovernments\u201D because both the National Government and the previous Labour Government have exercised their choice to set the bar too high for M\u0101ori to be able to prove that they had customary title. Notwithstanding that the courts do not do everything perfectly, they do not have the same political and economic interests as a Government has in the outcome. They have greater flexibility regarding the different tests that they could use. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000815\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThe 2004 legislation referred to, I think, \u201Ccontinuous ownership\u201D or \u201Ccontinuous title\u201D, but I cannot even remember the language that was used. There was basically a requirement that M\u0101ori had to own the land that sat alongside the foreshore and seabed area, and that would enable them to prove ownership. That was impossible for M\u0101ori practically everywhere, because the colonisation process in this country has been such that that land has been taken from practically every M\u0101ori iwi, hap\u016B, and wh\u0101nau in the country. That land was taken by force, it was taken unlawfully, and it was taken in accordance with promises that were never met. Yet that would still be sufficient to extinguish M\u0101ori customary title under the 2004 legislation. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000816\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThis bill does not have quite the same test as that in the 2004 Act, but it does require M\u0101ori to have exercised their customary rights or their rights to exclusive use and occupation in a manner that has been substantially uninterrupted since 1840. That is an impossible test. In a colonised country where the vast majority of what was M\u0101ori-owned land has been taken by the Crown, by Governments, there is no way that iwi can legitimately meet a test of exclusive use and occupation that has been substantially uninterrupted since 1840. It simply does not exist in the way that has been set out in this bill. So the bar has been set too high by the National Government and the M\u0101ori Party. I do not know why the M\u0101ori Party would set as high a test as this, a test that by far and away iwi and hap\u016B would not be able to meet. I do not know why the M\u0101ori Party would decide that it was OK to set a test as hard as that. The M\u0101ori Party readily understands that because this is a colonised country, most of that land has been taken. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000817\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003ENot only have we proposed an amendment on Supplementary Order Paper 206 in my name to remove the tests from the legislation but also, if that is not what the Committee wants to do, we have proposed an additional amendment to alter the test in the amended version of clause 61 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Minister, the Hon Chris Finlayson. Our amendment says a customary marine title will not be considered to be extinguished if somebody has been using the land for access and recreation, if somebody who has been using it has placed a structure or some other thing on that land, if someone has used it for an unlawful or unauthorised occupation, or if someone in the exercise of that unlawful or unauthorised occupation has then placed a thing, a structure, or a building on that land. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000818\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022fc8ab326-1806-41d3-8c41-cd58c95dcb45\u0022\u003EThis amendment just opens up more space for iwi, whanui, and hap\u016B to be able to meet the test. It means that if that area has been used as a recreational area or an access way by some people, without recourse at all to the iwi and hap\u016B who are claiming the customary title, then that is not enough to extinguish it. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022 data-id=\u0022d1085d0ce2b04d56aebfcfe5e79ad6f1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000819\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022d1085d0ce2b04d56aebfcfe5e79ad6f1\u0022\u003EHon SHANE JONES (Labour):\u003C/span\u003E T\u0113n\u0101 koe, Mr Chairperson. I direct the attention of the Committee to clause 50, which is on pages 17 and 18, in the Minister\u2019s Supplementary Order Paper 207 to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill. I have a modest and very helpful contribution in the form of an amendment to clause 50(3)(c)(i). As a reflection of the very shoddy process, rushed drafting, and deprived opportunity for people to have their democratic chance fully exploited, I invite the Government of the day to support this small change. It may come to pass that I am the only M\u0101ori member who will effect a small change to this legislation. If that be the case, I want Hansard to note that I did not need to leave my party to enjoy this status.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000820\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EI want to tell Tau Henare and Paul Quinn, the man who injudiciously and unwisely boasted that he read 500 pages, that Mr Quinn did not spot that error in subclause (3)(c)(i) where the Crown seeks to weaken and further make the M\u0101ori position in the seabed and foreshore more marginal, unknown to the member from Waiariki, Te Ururoa. On that point, I must say that the term \u201Cmuru\u201D means to plunder and thieve. \u201CMuru roa\u201D will be a name that will always\u2014not Ururoa\u2014be associated with this bill. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000821\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002257de1cc97fbb43858bbdd1c2097a3f9a\u0022\u003ETe Ururoa Flavell\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. Kei te whakah\u0113 au i t\u0113r\u0101 momo k\u014Drero e whakaiti nei te \u0101huatanga o taku ingoa. Ko m\u0101ua kei te m\u014Dhio ki a m\u0101ua. K\u0101re au i p\u0113r\u0101 rawa ki a ia. K\u0101re au i hiahia kia p\u0113r\u0101 rawa a ia ki t\u014Dku ingoa, t\u014Dku whakapapa. Me tuku whakap\u0101ha tonu a ia ki a au, otir\u0101, ki \u014Dku t\u016Bpuna.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000822\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022ec266512-9fe8-47da-883e-48f046ee5059\u0022\u003E[I object to that kind of talk, which belittles my name. We know each other really well. I do not behave like that towards him. I do not want him to belittle my name and my genealogy. He must apologise to me and my ancestors forthwith.] \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000823\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00223c9ffff8462346099dfc532c52f730d6\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The member makes a fair point. We should use each other\u2019s names in this House respectfully. I invite the member to withdraw the comment he has made and continue.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000824\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c129a8160abf40cea94bb83afad6ae9a\u0022\u003EHon SHANE JONES\u003C/span\u003E: Whakap\u0101ha ana au. I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. There is an equally well-known M\u0101ori saying\u2014and indeed it is repeated in the Bible\u2014\u201CDo unto others as you would have them do unto you\u201D. That rhythm and pattern of behaviour started with that member in his description of one of my new-found colleagues, Mr Harawira. However, let me come back\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000825\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00224196ebb9e90d4f98b1f12f0f81766466\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: I entertained the member\u2019s point of order not for him to make a further one. If the member who was offended at the time took offence, then it was for that member to raise the point of order and seek a withdrawal. The fact that the member did not raise it does not leave it open to the Hon Shane Jones then to make the point on his behalf. The fact is that Te Ururoa Flavell has taken offence at the misuse of his name. It is a fair point, and I have asked the member to withdraw the comment.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000826\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u002299d625cc78d24c05813addbcc3484cc7\u0022\u003EHon SHANE JONES\u003C/span\u003E: I withdraw and apologise. I direct our attention, and the attention of the member from the M\u0101ori Party, back to the contribution that I am making, which whether or not he likes it he will be voting for. It involves the change of the word \u201Cof\u201D for the word \u201Cby\u201D. Mr Quinn has called out \u201CWhereabouts?\u201D. It is on page 18 of Supplementary Order Paper 207, which he has not read, in new clause 50(3)(c)(i): \u201Cto inform iwi, hap\u016B\u201D\u2014[Interruption] I want the House to note when we move from the word \u201Cof\u201D, which is probably a possessive particle\u2014unlike Tau Henare, not possessed by Beelzebub\u2014to the word \u201Cby\u201D, the introduction of the word \u201Cby\u201D enables the readers, and the leaders of the hap\u016B, to understand that the obligations of the Crown will impact them. It will potentially have an inimical impact on them, or it could be irrelevant.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000827\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EI am inviting Tau Henare, Paul Quinn, and Te Ururoa Flavell to support this simple, modest, very helpful, and pro-democratic contribution this evening to bring lucidity to what, in many respects, is very dense and largely incomprehensible legislation, which is not unlike the contributions blurted out from that member who lives in Te Atat\u016B but who will never represent Te Atat\u016B.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000828\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EI should go on. I do not want to overplay the importance of this amendment, but I will bring it to the attention of the Attorney-General in the spirit of reasonableness. Not unlike a number of members on this side of the Chamber, he is no stranger to the finer points of the English language. So not for us these coarse contributions, not for us these banal outbursts; we leave that to that portion of the rump of National, which is soon to disappear when the party vote declines. It will be rather sad but rough justice that the member who fled from Winston Peters will watch that portion of the vote for the National Party bring Winston Peters back in and him out. He will go like the takutai moana\u2014the ebbing of the tide.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000829\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f44431ef-b505-4e94-9f57-a60b0a569bf7\u0022\u003EI need to come back and be relevant. A tremendous level of importance is attached to ensuring that when notice is given to our Treaty partners the M\u0101ori Party ensures that it does not look as if the M\u0101ori Treaty partner is being possessed by the Crown in the way in which the M\u0101ori Party is now possessed by National. No, this has to do with a likely impact.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022 data-id=\u0022495d70b0fbab435f8756c8d389af30fa\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000830\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022495d70b0fbab435f8756c8d389af30fa\u0022\u003EHon TAU HENARE (National):\u003C/span\u003E I move, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000831\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002251dfea20-2244-4fc7-bd7d-ebf7a98580e1\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question that the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u00220ce853d7055c4e06a37697a183bca65d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000832\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00220ce853d7055c4e06a37697a183bca65d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: While the Clerk is doing the count, let us start as we intend to continue. The kawa of this place is that votes are heard in silence. There are to be no interjections, oohs, ahs, or grumbles. It is difficult enough for the Clerk; it is getting late at night and we do not want to have any mistakes. When the voting is being called, members will be silent and give the Clerk a fair go.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022da71f26054214ea9a2bf27cd6a4df2d4\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the question be now put.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EMotion agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000833\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 215 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit the heading above clause 48 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022165e506fd279473d9f804c81af341c06\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000834\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 48 and clause 48 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002243ff5e1ef8784df5a6994ce6ef8e1395\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u00222c53f04e49d84418ad32d295d8c2a7fe\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000835\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222c53f04e49d84418ad32d295d8c2a7fe\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next is an amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 48, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. It is ruled out of order as it is inconsistent with the previous decision. The next amendments are in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 49. They are set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217, and they are also ruled out of order by the Chair as not being serious amendments. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000836\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment in the name of the Hon Shane Jones to the proposed amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clauses 49 to 51 and substitute new clauses 49 to 51 be agreed to: \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000837\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003Eto omit from new clause 50(3)(c)(i) \u201Cof\u201D and substitute \u201Cby\u201D.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000838\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EAmendment to the amendment agreed to. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000839\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendments in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 52 be agreed to: \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000840\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003Eto insert the following new subclause before subclause (1):\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000841\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E(1AA)\tIn this section, marine mammal has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Marine Mammals Protection Act 1978.; and\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000842\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003Eto omit from subclause (2)(b) \u201Ciwi or hap\u016B\u201D and substitute \u201Ciwi, hap\u016B, or wh\u0101nau\u201D.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e186e1abe0b844808adcdbf2768983e5\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u0022093be4759130430fae8dcee1c43b354a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000843\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022093be4759130430fae8dcee1c43b354a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments are in the name of Hilary Calvert. They are amendments to clause 52 to insert new subclause (1A) and to amend clause 52(2)(b), and they are set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. These are ruled out of order as they are inconsistent with the previous decision. The next amendment is Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 52(3)(a). This is set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. The Chair is also ruling this out as not being a serious amendment.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000844\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 206 in the name of Metiria Turei to omit clause 53 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fa0f912f69ba4d8ea8bd51b1e9e128dd\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000845\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 53(1)(a) to omit \u201C1840\u201D and substitute \u201C4 February 1840\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000846\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000847\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 53(1)(a) to omit \u201C; and\u201D and substitute \u201C, without any interruption of longer than 366 consecutive days; and\u201D and to clause 53(1)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002232d87c94d19d45089f6a17856b9f0293\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u00224910975e91f24e1dbf9ebaf5640a448a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000848\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224910975e91f24e1dbf9ebaf5640a448a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment is in the name of Hilary Calvert. It is an amendment to clause 53(2)(b)(i). This is set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. The Chair is ruling this one out of order as it is not a serious amendment.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000849\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 53(2)(d) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000850\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u00220c6c016eb4af41ee9097c97154ec7306\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000851\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00220c6c016eb4af41ee9097c97154ec7306\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next question is in the name of Hilary Calvert. It is an amendment to clause 53(3). This is set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. This is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with the principles and objectives of the bill.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000852\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 206 in the name of Metiria Turei to omit clause 54 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222b54fcd6c13f4184ae2e39ae0aec269d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000853\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 54(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c90bb79478464bae9908d76b5f1a6d9a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000854\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 54(2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d8f4661fe62f474a848f99f33d6b4e67\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u002291a1a818d3ed4706be4d1e50b05e23f8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000855\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002291a1a818d3ed4706be4d1e50b05e23f8\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment is the name of Hilary Calvert. It is an amendment to omit clause 54(2). It is on Supplementary Order Paper 217. It is ruled out of order as being inconsistent with the previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000856\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 54(3) and (4) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222753196f78cf485e85959b62e5e4e5c1\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000857\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 55(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c21b0b58e889488eaf1823c8b5cbbb1b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000858\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 55(2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220c386c85dc0d4aa1a17fef45a0e450ed\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000859\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 55(3) and substitute new clause 55(3) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022911f9415771b4c129ca952dc7376e487\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022 data-id=\u0022b1ec646b51ef4cb787d11fb97f62bb85\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000860\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b1ec646b51ef4cb787d11fb97f62bb85\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Hon Rick Barker)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment is in the name of Hilary Calvert. It is an amendment to omit clause 55(3). This is on Supplementary Order Paper 217. It is ruled is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000861\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002203bc0052-6dd8-4807-998a-4768a4732e0b\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 56 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f9b4030398874a799e3b9b48a84dc6fe\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000862\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 57 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227108613fc0c04dda866d4fd4caa62620\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022e55a9c4b2fba4379964c727a01f4cc98\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000863\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e55a9c4b2fba4379964c727a01f4cc98\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 57, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217, is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000864\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 58(1) to omit \u201Cimpose controls, including any terms, conditions, or restrictions that the Minister thinks fit, on the exercise of the rights.\u201D and substitute \u201Crevoke the protected customary right\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002243c1f069f1e74a75a709b95ea101ba77\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002249a0797368514bd2b9df86a5e5977c31\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000865\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002249a0797368514bd2b9df86a5e5977c31\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 58(1) to omit \u201Cthe Minister\u201D and substitute \u201Cthe Minister of Conservation\u201D. This is out of order. The following amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 58(2), to omit \u201Cperson\u201D and substitute \u201Cperson or group\u201D. This is also out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000866\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 58(2) to omit \u201Cright\u201D and substitute \u201Cright, or have a protected customary right revoked\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022735919b4f4aa4c789c32129834931334\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002214c61219ff5847748cc46d9e505873ab\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000867\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002214c61219ff5847748cc46d9e505873ab\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 58(3). These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. The amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 58(4) to omit \u201CMinister\u201D and substitute \u201CMinister of Conservation\u201D and to omit \u201Capplicant\u201D and substitute \u201Capplicant and protected customary rights group\u201D are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000868\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 58(4) to omit \u201Caccordingly\u201D and substitute \u201Cwithin five days of making a decision\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222622ec0a473e42219e3c817648b75925\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00224fa23f1292f54ee08b020342561d40c1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000869\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224fa23f1292f54ee08b020342561d40c1\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 59(1), (2)(c), and (2)(e). These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000870\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 59(3)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022194e87e8553e4afdbf344c9150bdbb54\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000871\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to add new clause 59(3)(e) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227e88073898d745d6ba30545c6aedf61d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00223773c6b6bf3c495ca188acbc2d8718a3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000872\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00223773c6b6bf3c495ca188acbc2d8718a3\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 59(5), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000873\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 60 and substitute new clause 60 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d1df06db27074136be243a0537aaa864\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00225c83a65e548045b4811a534cf82207ed\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000874\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225c83a65e548045b4811a534cf82207ed\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment is in the name of Metiria Turei to omit clause 60, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 206. This is now out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. We have an amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 60(1)(b). This is out of order as also being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000875\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 206 in the name of Metiria Turei to omit clause 61 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e0d800c1cbda49f9bef9078cd32eb735\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 54\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00229a41b8c4b6674d58971ddc0cbb7e4e88\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000876\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229a41b8c4b6674d58971ddc0cbb7e4e88\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 61(1), to omit \u201Cwhether customary title exists\u201D and substitute \u201Cdetermine existence of customary marine title\u201D, is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000877\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 61(1) to omit \u201Cmay\u201D and substitute \u201Cmust\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b90e7c35fa304f09a8fb709ca3b2b3cf\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000878\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 4, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022b868f44283fe45e0b2ab648c704ad261\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000879\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b868f44283fe45e0b2ab648c704ad261\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 61(1)(a)(i) to omit \u201Csubstantial interruption\u201D and substitute \u201Cinterruption of 366 consecutive days or longer\u201D, as set out Supplementary Order Paper 217. This is now out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000880\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 61(1)(a)(i) to omit \u201C1840\u201D and substitute \u201C6 February 1840\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227c252dd8c9d5402b8ad7685a0dc751d3\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000881\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 4, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000882\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment in the name of Metiria Turei to the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 61 be agreed to:\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000883\u0022\u003Eto omit new subclause (2A) and substitute the following subclauses:\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000884\u0022\u003E(2A)\tThe use at any time, by persons who are not members of an applicant group, of a specified area of the common marine and coastal area for access and recreation as described in section 27, navigation as described in section 28, and fishing as described in section 29 does not, of itself, preclude the applicant group from establishing the existence of customary marine title.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000885\u0022\u003E(2B)\tThe placement of any structure or other thing by any persons who are not members of the applicant group in connection with the use of the rights described in subsection (2A) does not, of itself, preclude the applicant group from establishing the existence of customary marine title.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000886\u0022\u003E(2C)\tThe unlawful or unauthorised use or occupation at any time, or placement of any structure or thing in relation to that unlawful or unauthorised use or occupation at any time by persons who are not members of an applicant group, of a specified area of the common marine and coastal area does not, of itself, preclude the applicant group from establishing the existence of customary marine title.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000887\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 62 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022cb200ffba9b54fb09e369dc413aa0db5\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000888\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 62, Noes 58.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00221c525d6d75b742d0bf8110304bf2a55a\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000889\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00221c525d6d75b742d0bf8110304bf2a55a\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: We have amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 61(1)(a)(i) and (ii) to omit \u201C1840\u201D and substitute other dates. These are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee. A further amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to omit clause 62. This is also out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000890\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 63(2)(a) and (b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229cccdbc8b96640119b12e8dd7b8f20f6\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000891\u0022\u003EThe result corrected after originally being announced as Ayes 4, Noes 116.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000892\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 63(2)(c) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022cb967379e0194828a21f3b48ccd89836\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00223d23070959014add9ea6ffe00635d8bd\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000893\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00223d23070959014add9ea6ffe00635d8bd\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 63(2)(c). This is out of order because it is inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000894\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to insert new clause 63A be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00221d633df91c8e4dd5995632b77b1c924e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u0022373d24e8cbcb49bcbceda1520b7cba87\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000895\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022373d24e8cbcb49bcbceda1520b7cba87\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I seek leave to amend the ACT Party vote from 4 votes to 5 votes for the last four votes that were taken, the four different votes that were before the Committee of the whole House. I ask for them to be amended from 4 to 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002271b6d1b12c16418283140bc7ee370a01\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000896\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002271b6d1b12c16418283140bc7ee370a01\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: Leave is sought for that purpose. Is there any objection? There is no objection. The record will be corrected. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000897\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe next amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert is to omit new clause 63A. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000898\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 64(1)(a) to (e) and (2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228a7ed33683344185a775d455f722d2b9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 116\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000899\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 64(3) and (4) and substitute new clause 64(3) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00225a19fa8e32df46d6bfe3bd2babf46e79\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022a58489855baa49ce83732a8b630fe088\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000900\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a58489855baa49ce83732a8b630fe088\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 64(3). This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000901\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 213 in the name of Metiria Turei to omit new clause 64C set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fe4caae7fe8e4a7a9ee84aee22bd4042\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment to the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment to the amendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000902\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 65(1) and (2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022a76b49350c7d46ca94afe8502eef8977\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000903\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 65 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227c6b559aaf6b4ef1b8aebfe9607b3717\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter, C Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022e3998897efc44e5a869173c4a9496e78\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000904\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e3998897efc44e5a869173c4a9496e78\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 65, to omit subclauses (3) and (4), as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000905\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 65(5) and (6) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b7fd69e043f0464f88aefc778d9d2890\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000906\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment in the name of the Hon David Parker to clause 65 be agreed to: \u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000907\u0022\u003Eto insert the following new subclause after subclause (6):\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000908\u0022\u003E(6A)\tAn RMA permission right does not apply to the grant or exercise of a resource consent for aquaculture activities as defined in section 2(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00226a5c37934d7e49b7bf15cd63b074da78\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 59\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 9; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000909\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 65(8) to omit \u201CConservation\u201D and substitute \u201CJustice\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00225428a2b7d4c5422faa9a409359c54b88\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 6\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000910\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 65(8) to omit \u201Cthe Environment\u201D and substitute \u201CLand Information\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222bf4a6dc97c54968a5e4cff9f2338137\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000911\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 66(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b884eade22594a9287ec758c4d7e42a4\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000912\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 66(2) and substitute new clause 66(2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00221033f5b97c2a4e66bfbeb51dcf45de14\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote  was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 58\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022c22d2549869e4479b14b38ac51554fd2\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000913\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c22d2549869e4479b14b38ac51554fd2\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 66(2) is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000914\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 66(3) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C7\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002208fe69e1bb9948b9839ffe6ca29943b2\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000915\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 66(3) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C20\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022278348ea54684e14ab5283cd322ccb84\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000916\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 66(5) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002270391c6ceb9a4e8e8b7739dac1647790\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000917\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 67 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022160d54b319f74627a6b8d02fc9fc2727\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022306b82029e764fa7877167dc427dff6d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000918\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022306b82029e764fa7877167dc427dff6d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 68(1), to omit \u201Cis\u201D and substitute \u201Cis not\u201D. This is out of order as being inconsistent with the principles and objects of the bill.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000919\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(1) to omit \u201Cunless the relevant customary marine title group has given permission under section 65(2)\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022155d30e92bdd43d79c08f8b1e9a9f1df\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000920\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(2)(a) to omit \u201Cyears\u201D and substitute \u201Cdays\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220265f5a35e4c4c1fb8f928582145f075\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 115\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 8; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000921\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(2)(a) to omit \u201C2\u201D and substitute \u201C1\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00224f44a13cd94b49cb8cd3d2a56931b9ff\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000922\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to 68(2)(a) to omit \u201C$300,000\u201D and substitute \u201C50 cents\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022969f7b0b27dc4b5f9c7d81fff69c9967\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022ef8c168e667e444a8dbcb99aeae63599\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000923\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022ef8c168e667e444a8dbcb99aeae63599\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 68(2)(a) to omit $300,000\u201D and substitute \u201C$50,000\u201D. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000924\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(2)(b) to omit \u201C$600,000\u201D and substitute \u201C$3.50\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e7c2b3d3ad1b48f5ac591245e1f22148\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00224f404441f75d47fdba187298f11b4031\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000925\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224f404441f75d47fdba187298f11b4031\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name is to clause 68(2)(b) to omit \u201C$600,000\u201D and substitute \u201C$60,000\u201D. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000926\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(3) and (3)(a), (b), and (c) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d7b465ef6a8749c0b359bafd3b72578f\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000927\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(4)(a) to omit \u201C10%\u201D and substitute \u201C90%\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229e44d58e9f05468689558d09e2c65bc7\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000928\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022a620dfd657424b8dbdca6d306cae6d82\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in the name of Hilary Calvert are to clause 68(4)(a) to omit \u201C10%\u201D and substitute \u201C25%\u201D and to omit \u201Cfrom the\u201D and substitute \u201Cfrom half the\u201D are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000929\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 68(4)(b)(ii) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f82bbbae7afb40eb87c0ca727e89879e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000930\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 69 and substitute new clause 69 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022be2aafc25c034a88a4c2d09a7a60f07a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C; Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00226429794109fb464a95416baffd0e6958\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000931\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226429794109fb464a95416baffd0e6958\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name to omit clause 69 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000932\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 70(1) and substitute new clause 70(1) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022dd63370e962a4a21b93212c5b6fca3e1\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 57\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C; Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022959754b3274b46e4a1d22cbcfe0d9c09\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000933\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022959754b3274b46e4a1d22cbcfe0d9c09\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendments in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name to clause 70(1) as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000934\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 70(2) to (6) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f230aa0a8fdf46c999ea632ebaffc00a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C; Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u002275f912357f3a4b6d93c8f684560065a3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000935\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002275f912357f3a4b6d93c8f684560065a3\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 71 as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. The question is that the amendment be agreed to. Those of that opinion will say Aye\u2014\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000936\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u00220b8df5888a2d48e1a37c4b89a8e6f30c\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. You said \u201Cthe amendment to clause 71\u201D. There are a number of amendments to clause 71. Are you referring to all of the amendments proposed? Are you referring to just the first one? I could not understand from your call which amendment or amendments you were referring to. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000937\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c14ad550f00849f3b0c26c62235a735b\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: I am advised that there is only one amendment to clause 71, so that is what I am putting. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000938\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022e3d703980c7745709366020914e23db6\u0022\u003EHon John Boscawen\u003C/span\u003E: I am looking at page 14 of Supplementary Order Paper 217. I can see under clause 71 \u201CSubclause (1): to omit \u2018of Conservation\u2019 \u201D, \u201CSubclause (1)(a): to omit \u2018, unless the person \u2026\u2019 \u201D, \u201CSubclause (1)(b): to omit \u2018not\u2019 \u201D, \u201CSubclause (1)(b): to omit \u2018until the\u2019 \u2026\u201D. There are a number of amendments at the bottom of page 14 of Supplementary Order Paper 217. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000939\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c793aae8fccd43be8ace7bbfdf0990ff\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: As I have advised previously with other clauses, there is only one question on clause 71, which covers all those subclauses that you have mentioned. That is how we have previously done it during the course of the votes. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000940\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 71 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220bd2c86ba9b54d84ab231f3557f0de7b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000941\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 72(1) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C5\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022beb5f28140bf4b8d922085f788f1d284\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 114\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 7; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u00222a58bffe8c1d4788bf5c6fc66a457d30\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000942\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222a58bffe8c1d4788bf5c6fc66a457d30\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The following amendment in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name is to clause 72(1) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C30\u201D as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. This is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000943\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 72(1) to omit \u201Cworking days\u201D and substitute \u201Chours\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222d4192fe4cb0405db523fb7cb6e5bf27\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022 data-id=\u0022c12d0a38ea46457d8e4772b1a3056eff\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000944\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c12d0a38ea46457d8e4772b1a3056eff\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch)\u003C/span\u003E: The next amendment in the name of Hilary Calvert is to clause 72(1), to omit \u201Cworking days\u201D and substitute \u201Cminutes\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. It is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. The next amendments in Hilary Calvert\u2019s name to clause 72(1)(a) and (b) are out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000945\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022893adc11-ce4e-419c-a079-08f04b3d75f5\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 72(3)(a) and (b) and substitute new clause 72(3)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002288010036fe5849888b6a441a1703460c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u00221e039f7f6c3f4ba49b5ab5d4a7331d05\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000946\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00221e039f7f6c3f4ba49b5ab5d4a7331d05\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I realise that voting has to continue until we finish this part, but the ACT Party would have no objection if the Committee wanted to rise early and come back and consider voting tomorrow afternoon.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000947\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsBy\u0022 id=\u0022c180f0b9fd7b4052a75522e8eb041da7\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: That is not anything that the member has said except an expression. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000948\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 73 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022386f79df487943aa8aba9f98ded18c1e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000949\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to the heading to clause 74 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c36de8a6df6f430091a0fe1cfeeb95a2\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00226aed6104a0ed4c8099bdeaa7928e5d64\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000950\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226aed6104a0ed4c8099bdeaa7928e5d64\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 74 to omit \u201Cof Conservation\u201D and substitute \u201Cfor Land Information\u201D is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000951\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 74 to omit \u201Chave regard to\u201D and substitute \u201Cbe advised of\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222301a31a3fc74cef86e008a63b9d9ed3\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000952\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 74(a) to omit \u201Con\u201D and substitute \u201Cand wider iwi, wh\u0101nau or hap\u016B on\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022ce2f63ad12c9499cb1c686e3ac1def31\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022346d4759650d40b783062637ca7c8d90\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000953\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022346d4759650d40b783062637ca7c8d90\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 74(a) and (b) to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Ccustomary marine title group and wider iwi, wh\u0101nau or hap\u016B\u201D are out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000954\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 74(c) and (d) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022074a8697292041b89011a6e1917bb926\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000955\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 75(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00222399d242177e46e89a1b22811182482c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 55\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00228b18e5c4fcfd4e678d228cd4a674622d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000956\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228b18e5c4fcfd4e678d228cd4a674622d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert has an amendment to clause 75(1) to omit \u201Cgrants\u201D and substitute \u201Cor Minister for the Environment grants\u201D. That is on Supplementary Order Paper 217. That is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000957\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 75(1)(a)(ii) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C5\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00226849d20726c1439f9b88f4117e06b34c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00223bbfe44791b54f20b08e720c6b89e8fe\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000958\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00223bbfe44791b54f20b08e720c6b89e8fe\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert has an amendment to clause 75(1)(a)(ii) to omit \u201C40\u201D and substitute \u201C30\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217. That is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000959\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the following amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 75(1)(a)(ii) to omit \u201Cworking days\u201D and substitute \u201Chours\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b7ca1b916bd04ebe91f1024de9698a0c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022998db3f0c8e44f848b41578004a89ffb\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000960\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022998db3f0c8e44f848b41578004a89ffb\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 75(1)(a)(ii) to omit \u201Cworking days\u201D and substitute \u201Cminutes\u201D is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000961\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the remaining amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 75 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022bef61aee74904544a8e25dda32962c5b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000962\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 217 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 76 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002263db099329ac4dea9e233125b14b633c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000963\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 77(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022118c3b2ae0494cfeb30ef4060b449886\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000964\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to insert new clause 77(1A) and (1B) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000965\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000966\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 77(2) and (3) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fb15f0daeee0482396ee06510ed22578\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00222c4aaed91015400d9ad4ff8fcdf502a0\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000967\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222c4aaed91015400d9ad4ff8fcdf502a0\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 77(4) to omit \u201Cresponsible Minister\u201D and substitute \u201CMinister for Land Information\u201D as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000968\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the remaining amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 77(4) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228911609a85d44612939309ded35ef96c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000969\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to 78(1) to omit \u201Cor an agreement\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022a7bf41ceffb349e598c1c141ce10157d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000970\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 78(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002245e0b4222e3046338d84f875a44feb56\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000971\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 78(1)(a) to omit \u201Cboundaries\u201D and substitute \u201Cboundaries and any significant features\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002259ed8fdd436e4edaaa6917f4a4b65f4f\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00229c9060a622834be083952f1852113867\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000972\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229c9060a622834be083952f1852113867\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 78(1)(a) to omit \u201Cboundaries\u201D and substitute \u201Cboundaries and any significant features\u201D is a duplicate and out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000973\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 78(1)(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e6b875cdc41f4971a87cd75021a201c0\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022af37988fb20e412fb413166cc1a3ae79\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000974\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022af37988fb20e412fb413166cc1a3ae79\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 78(1)(c) to omit \u201Cindividuals\u201D and substitute \u201Cindividuals and groups\u201D, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000975\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 78(1)(c) to omit \u201Cin relation to\u201D and substitute \u201Cwithin the boundaries of\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fa7cbadf579e4dc6a4d63fb0168c1a4b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000976\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 78(1)(c) to omit \u201Cexemption\u201D and substitute \u201Cexemption for customary right holders, w\u0101hi tapu groups, and other iwi, wh\u0101nau and hap\u016B\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002279f17c2f58b74c85ba0e290fb282d1e7\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000977\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 78(1)(c) to omit \u201Cexemption\u201D and substitute \u201Cexemption for customary right holders and members of the public\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002268148b830e624bc19c4d5d1a5c61c504\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000978\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to insert new clause 78(1A) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022fce2ff3f65a549aa8b7e4d6e9517e70c\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000979\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 78(2) and substitute new clause 78(2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022bcabe2fa3e094357bda102c5199aca09\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 55\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u002239d06b977526428181dc2df53a0ec1a6\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000980\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002239d06b977526428181dc2df53a0ec1a6\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 78(2), as set out in Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now inconsistent and out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000981\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 78(3) and (4) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022da88b759f66b46179b4e86546fc43e63\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 5; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000982\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 79 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022ae3f1cb174b14085bca4e5788d154b3f\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000983\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 80(1) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022ea8844d4b42b4977805ea11a7604ecc9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000984\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 80(2) to omit \u201C$5,000\u201D and substitute \u201C$5.00\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022364c3b678cf74cfdb8f793f88979f9a9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u002204806d61e06c45d5bb450ccb000a9b63\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000985\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002204806d61e06c45d5bb450ccb000a9b63\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s next amendment to clause 80(2) to omit \u201C$5,000\u201D and substitute \u201C$2,500\u201D is inconsistent and is now out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000986\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 80(2) and (3) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022ef01f2d42a2d4ac6847752d67334019e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00227b3e7acd804642a0ad7956b0eafab710\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000987\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00227b3e7acd804642a0ad7956b0eafab710\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit clauses 80(3)(a) and (b) is ruled out of order as being inconsistent and the amendment to clause 80(4) to omit \u201Cif\u2014\u201D, was not presented in a proper form and is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000988\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 80(4)(a) and (b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228fdf2989e62c41fa924afe4bc300cfc1\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000989\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit the heading to clause 81 and clause 81(1) and (2) be agreed to. \u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00225a6adbeb3ff048d09359c290dbcdf790\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00226724a419d82a4cc3ac56dfdba4830004\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000990\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00226724a419d82a4cc3ac56dfdba4830004\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert has an amendment to clause 81(3) to omit \u201Cperson\u201D and substitute \u201Cperson or group\u201D. This is now inconsistent with a previous decision and is out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000991\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(3) to omit \u201Carea\u201D and substitute \u201Carea or w\u0101hi tapu area\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e65208cbeb094fda808df6686383269f\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000992\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(3) to omit \u201C28\u201D and substitute \u201C10\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022266655ee286d4373a0a9017de8a72e48\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00228e2aa8b39a5c4f2f98347d51c83da34c\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000993\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228e2aa8b39a5c4f2f98347d51c83da34c\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert has an amendment to clause 81(3) to omit \u201C28\u201D and substitute \u201C20\u201D. That is now ruled out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000994\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(3) to omit \u201Cdays\u201D and substitute \u201Cweeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220555b4aee25b40b1a23c93cff4e5b933\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022030bb3930b3a484e8c37691e73278838\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000995\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022030bb3930b3a484e8c37691e73278838\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s next amendment to clause 81(3) to omit \u201Cdays\u201D and substitute \u201Cmonths\u201D is now out of order as it is inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000996\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 81(4) and (4)(a) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002293b8f3a62c0b4d94aafaf2107930a868\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000997\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(4)(b) to omit \u201C6\u201D and substitute \u201C7\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022eb46f6ac877b4e8e9a3577f84258c980\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022c9cdb65ced7c44c89598a50101aaf1c0\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000998\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022c9cdb65ced7c44c89598a50101aaf1c0\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 81(4)(b) to omit \u201C6\u201D and substitute \u201C10\u201D is now out of order as it is inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1000999\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(4)(b) to omit \u201Cmonths\u201D and substitute \u201Cweeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00226d1cc435061f47658b1a311a17d88a13\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022a20a8f27d26748f197fd67fba106ec90\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001000\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a20a8f27d26748f197fd67fba106ec90\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 81(4)(b) to omit \u201Cmonths\u201D and substitute \u201Cyears\u201D is now out of order as it is inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001001\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(4)(b) to omit \u201Cnotice\u201D and substitute \u201Cdiscovery\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228fa21c4d0fc3441c9ee722280ff6d181\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001002\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to clause 81 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002227e45c3fbedf4c68930b310e7f79949d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00222fd14bcb159644faa9cc4fa2b1c2a7b1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001003\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222fd14bcb159644faa9cc4fa2b1c2a7b1\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit clause 81(5), set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001004\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(6) to omit \u201C6\u201D and substitute \u201C7\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022a97f6244e9eb436fb49c6e66dfbfc6ab\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00225397ab0108784471a1f9376924d53899\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001005\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00225397ab0108784471a1f9376924d53899\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 81(6) to omit \u201C6\u201D and substitute \u201C10\u201D is now out of order because it is inconsistent with the previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001006\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(6) to omit \u201Cmonths\u201D and substitute \u201Cweeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228bf28bd38c1e4eaa9137cae44bdfc0f1\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00222c06c086fc264eeb95f0ea368dc0e9b1\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001007\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222c06c086fc264eeb95f0ea368dc0e9b1\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 81(6) to omit \u201Cmonths\u201D and substitute \u201Cyears\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now inconsistent with the previous decision and out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001008\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(7) to omit \u201Cthe specified time\u201D and substitute \u201C6 months\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002201a461c36661488e8dc3b96015a76712\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022833f9f2bc860465f90572f74f8cf9683\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001009\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022833f9f2bc860465f90572f74f8cf9683\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 81(7) to omit \u201Cthe specified time\u201D and substitute \u201C12 months\u201D is inconsistent with the previous decision and out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001010\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 81(7)(a) and (b) and clause 81(8) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022b421fb9fe4f04b229db29af4ef3dde32\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001011\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 81(9) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002287f9c8fd99a24814823d43477eef2ad0\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001012\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit the heading to clause 82 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c2974f9db67348a0930b35d82721a5f9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001013\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 82(1) to omit \u201Cthe effective date\u201D and substitute \u201C1 January 2015\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d6fb11687280470bb9af637b93b61ae2\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022cb063259f7d04322aa685fe6ea8bef4d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001014\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022cb063259f7d04322aa685fe6ea8bef4d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 82(1) to omit \u201Cthe effective date\u201D and substitute \u201C31 December 2020\u201D is now out of order as being inconsistent with the previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001015\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 82(2) to (4) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022aea52e0166d247cfb82a66d050c7cb8d\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001016\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clauses 83 and 84 and substitute new clauses 83 and 84 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002216d100a19a2c443f99500f11eee8e090\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022b243a03800f54e05ba705e915910d11d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001017\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b243a03800f54e05ba705e915910d11d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to omit clauses 83 and 84, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, are now out of order as being inconsistent with the previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001018\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 85 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229ab4579548d543ce8e1c496f94094376\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00224fa32069751348a28afdb099193b391f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001019\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00224fa32069751348a28afdb099193b391f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit the heading to clause 85, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order as being inconsistent.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001020\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 85(1) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00223548b50038014379a87d1b87f2f8efd4\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001021\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 85(2) to omit \u201Con the day\u201D and substitute \u201Cone week\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022aab62a31c09245e9be2098c73d273935\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00228d9484ab0bdd452ca3b5d499984b059f\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001022\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228d9484ab0bdd452ca3b5d499984b059f\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 85(2) to omit \u201Con the day\u201D and substitute \u201C48 hours\u201D is now out of order as being inconsistent with the previous decision. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001023\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 86 and substitute new clause 86 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002286a690a9abf647008a4ff67289c63ff6\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00228aa8308ac08846c789824b5838913cbc\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001024\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00228aa8308ac08846c789824b5838913cbc\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit clause 86, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001025\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 87 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022d8f26c448b234bc3ac735f4f949725f5\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u002202f52d5b2398439eb9db6eb9c2b25c86\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001026\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002202f52d5b2398439eb9db6eb9c2b25c86\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit the heading to clause 87 set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 is now out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001027\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 87(1) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002245b5341601f2423fbb1042f9ba1705ef\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001028\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 87(2) and substitute new clause 87(2) be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00227d7339953f33476aa5e0cadb1e98f2c7\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00222ed48a5399ac4be6b778420b2720490b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001029\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00222ed48a5399ac4be6b778420b2720490b\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 87(2), set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, are now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001030\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 88 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00225864c76ce4344bcdab1d7cd523652c85\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022b7c2891cc00e4474bd52bc6af1a5ffb9\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001031\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022b7c2891cc00e4474bd52bc6af1a5ffb9\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit the heading to clause 88, as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001032\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 88 to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022f739e62ff0884f8cb47266ec1e19f992\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001033\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 88(a) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo weeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e6bda7ed24a64e7da88dca39b48ee2ef\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00229d01605507524e76b114824e2155e43d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001034\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229d01605507524e76b114824e2155e43d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 88(a) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo months\u201D is now out of order. \u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001035\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 88(a) to omit \u201Cregistered\u201D and substitute \u201Creceived\u201D and to omit \u201Cmust\u201D and substitute \u201Cmay\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229f248908058d4cebb80dee1b76a3d36b\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00227b0259a8d11446e9a79b9d95d33971e3\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001036\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00227b0259a8d11446e9a79b9d95d33971e3\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 88(a) to omit \u201Chave particular regard to\u201D and substitute \u201Cconsider\u201D as set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 is now out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 88(a) to omit \u201Carea\u201D and substitute \u201Carea or w\u0101hi tapu area\u201D, and to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 are now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001037\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit clause 88(b) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002203ba9a20336d4b549cf3b2acc1ededb9\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001038\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 89 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022e080dc5e072941959525f55604e92535\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 62\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 4; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022f13a8b4bde41470aa9739cd5ca52a723\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001039\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022f13a8b4bde41470aa9739cd5ca52a723\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit the heading to clause 89, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Cgroup and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D is now out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001040\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Cmust\u201D and substitute \u201Cmay\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00229a83219f943f4288999832e8e6576d29\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 113\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 4; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001041\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to 89(1) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo weeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220ca0757bb93549f18f3fa6e12af494c4\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022a7666002b7344786bbe8ca1ed39d5df8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001042\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022a7666002b7344786bbe8ca1ed39d5df8\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo months\u201D is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001043\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Cregistered\u201D and substitute \u201Creceived\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c07248ab84c34cf18aca9e02fd0d495e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u002226839a4662aa47188ed8007507f72e48\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001044\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u002226839a4662aa47188ed8007507f72e48\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Ctake into account\u201D and substitute \u201Cconsider\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Carea\u201D and substitute \u201Carea or w\u0101hi tapu area\u201D is now inconsistent and out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 89(1) to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001045\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to omit subclause 89(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00226fe502521b16483c81007253aecdca54\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001046\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the heading to clause 90 be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022312f8c1876614b36b7193869166daf3e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00223a17e2ac6f3344a59c86477b69498462\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001047\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00223a17e2ac6f3344a59c86477b69498462\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to the heading to clause 90, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order as being inconsistent. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D is now out of order for the same reason. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Cof Fisheries\u201D and substitute \u201Cof Conservation\u201D is also out of order for the same reason.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001048\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Cmust\u201D and substitute \u201Cmay\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022c840fc90a5fe401a9122e28f522186cd\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001049\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo weeks\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u002292d511625bb842039167c9b92758b082\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 111\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022ba422149146543cd9f09b5061f15cfa8\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001050\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022ba422149146543cd9f09b5061f15cfa8\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Con and\u201D and substitute \u201Ctwo months\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001051\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218 in the name of Hilary Calvert to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Cregistered\u201D and substitute \u201Creceived\u201D be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u0022cc741d77ad584b659529dae17c0d21ec\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 5\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EACT New Zealand 5.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 112\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; New Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; M\u0101ori Party 3; Progressive 1; United Future 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment not agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022987387049e1941c7a62898d7fd43624b\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001052\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022987387049e1941c7a62898d7fd43624b\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Chave regard to\u201D and substitute \u201Cconsider\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Carea\u201D and substitute \u201Carea or w\u0101hi tapu area\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order. Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to clause 90(1) to omit \u201Cgroup\u201D and substitute \u201Cgroup or w\u0101hi tapu group\u201D, set out on Supplementary Order Paper 218, is now out of order as being inconsistent.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001053\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 90(2) and substitute new clause 90(2) be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00228f223c3720284652968688d6fdbf4c51\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022e0107598c71148dbb65ebbd602ea4b5d\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001054\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022e0107598c71148dbb65ebbd602ea4b5d\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit and substitute clause 90(2) is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001055\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to omit clause 91 and substitute new clauses 91AA and 91 be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00223d128ed0d3b64d83946baa19235ffeb4\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendment be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendment agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u0022bbe779a075f544b88d6173630b408eec\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001056\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u0022bbe779a075f544b88d6173630b408eec\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendment to omit clause 91 is out of order as being inconsistent with a previous decision. The Hon David Parker\u2019s typescript amendment to omit clauses 48 to 91 is out of order as a direct negative.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001057\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper 211 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson to the proposed amendments to clauses 84 and 91(8) set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in his name be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00223321159ae2be492eb75b87ef90fd1091\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments to the amendments be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments to the amendments agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001058\u0022\u003EThe question was put that the remaining amendments as amended set out on Supplementary Order Paper 207 in the name of the Hon Christopher Finlayson be agreed to.\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00221cca24fd5ed44d2ab4914455eed6198a\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That the amendments as amended be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAmendments as amended agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022 data-id=\u00229f311e64088e4521a31fcdebac54bce0\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001059\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u002277ec6495-df45-43ac-aaa1-a03b5dd4c128\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00229f311e64088e4521a31fcdebac54bce0\u0022\u003EHon JOHN BOSCAWEN (Whip\u2014ACT):\u003C/span\u003E I raise a point of order, Mr Chairperson. I had been waiting until the voting on the amendments had finished. I have a query relating to the first page of Supplementary Order Paper 218. You moved pretty quickly through the amendments, but if I am not mistaken you put all four of Hilary Calvert\u2019s amendments to clause 77(4) together. The second and third amendments are contradictory. The second amendment calls for the omission of \u201Cas soon as practicable after\u201D and substituting \u201Cwithin 40 working days of\u201D. The next amendment calls for it to be substituted with \u201Cwithin 20 working days of\u201D. Those two amendments are totally contradictory to each other, and I just wondered how we could vote on those amendments together. Surely they would have to be put separately, because they are totally different concepts.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca name=\u0022member\u0022 data-type=\u0022article\u0022 data-memberid=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022 data-id=\u00220a2060e8c6604174933822993d524733\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001060\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsNormal\u0022 id=\u0022f4112fc5-c53f-4aa9-bf6d-5a05ce6252cf\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsByToc\u0022 id=\u00220a2060e8c6604174933822993d524733\u0022\u003EThe CHAIRPERSON (Eric Roy)\u003C/span\u003E: I am not sure I was in the Chair at the time. Advice had been sought in regard to these matters. I say to the member that at the start of each vote quite clearly what was happening has been called. It might have been mentioned quite rapidly, but each amendment was quite clearly set out as to what was being voted on. The exact typescript of every single amendment or amendments was read out, and it was at that time that the member should have objected.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\u003Ca id=\u00220d5abadf304047a796483cb9bfd0ce1e\u0022 name=\u0022division\u0022\u003E\u003C/a\u003E\u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EA party vote was called for on the question, That Part 3 as amended be agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EAyes 61\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand National 57; M\u0101ori Party 3; United Future 1.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENoes 56\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003ENew Zealand Labour 42; Green Party 6; ACT New Zealand 5; Progressive 1; Independents: Carter C, Harawira.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp class=\u0022HpsDivision\u0022\u003E\u003Cspan class=\u0022HpsItem\u0022\u003EPart 3 as amended agreed to.\u003C/span\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001061\u0022\u003EProgress reported.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001062\u0022\u003EReport adopted.\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001063\u0022\u003EThe House adjourned at 12.16 a.m. (Thursday)\u003C/p\u003E\n      \u003Cp id=\u0022id20110316776d1ae5909146358c4993c20b5284f1001064\u0022\u003E\u003Cbr\u003E\u003C/p\u003E\n    \u003C/div\u003E\n  \u003C/body\u003E\n\u003C/html\u003E"